Your search returned 83 results in 16 document sections:

1 2
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 1., Chapter 4: seditious movements in Congress.--Secession in South Carolina, and its effects. (search)
ger.Anthony W. Dozier. Henry McIver.D. P. Robinson.John H. Kinsler.Gabriel Manigault.John G. Pressley. Stephen Jackson.H. E. Young.Ephraim M. Clark.John Julius Pringle Smith.R. C. Logan. W. Pinckney Shingler.H. W. Garlington.Alex. H. Brown.Isaac W. Hayne.Francis S. Parker. Peter P. Bonneau.John D. Williams.E. S. P. Bellinger.Jn. H. Honour.Benj. Faneuil Duncan. John P. Richardson.W. D. Watts.Merrick E. Carn.Richard De Treville.Samuel Taylor Atkinson. John L. Manning.Thos. Wier.E. R. Henderl to the ground instantly. There is now, he said, no law on the subject of the collection of duties in South Carolina, now that we have accomplished the work of forty years. --The Congress of the United States is no longer our Government, said Mr. Hayne. The Legislature, he contended, was competent to declare what laws of the United States should be continued, and what not. --All the revenue and postal laws, repeated Mr. Gregg, fell to the ground on the passage of the Ordinance of Secession.
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 1., Chapter 11: the Montgomery Convention.--treason of General Twiggs.--Lincoln and Buchanan at the Capital. (search)
r to the President; whereupon Pickens sent Isaac W. Hayne, the Attorney-General of the State, in come unavailing to secure that possession. Commissioner Hayne was authorized to give the pledge of theto President Buchanan, January 11, 1861. Mr. Hayne arrived in Washington City on the 13th of Jah power to make the arrangement you suggest, Mr. Hayne replied, in writing; but, provided you can g toward South Carolina, I will refer Isaac W Hayne. your communication to the authorities of Souct of said correspondence. In their letter to Hayne, signed by the ten Senators, they assure him tnth. Our people, said these conspirators to Mr. Hayne, feel that they have a common destiny with ye reached Charleston, Governor Pickens ordered Hayne to present the demand for the surrender of Sumth of September, 1865. Before Commissioner Hayne was dismissed, Commissioner Thomas J. Judge apnt placed Mr. Judge on the same footing with Mr. Hayne, as only a distinguished private gentleman, [1 more...]
for which it was founded, those very objections which in the beginning had been answered, abandoned, and thrown aside, were brought to light again, and presented to the country as expositions of the true meaning of the Constitution. Webster, one of the first to revive some of those early misconceptions so long ago refuted as to be almost forgotten, and to breathe into them such renewed vitality as his commanding genius could impart, in the course of his well-known debate in the Senate with Hayne in 1830, said: It can not be shown that the Constitution is a compact between State governments. The Constitution itself, in its very front, refutes that proposition: it declares that it is ordained and established by the people of the United States. So far from saying that it is established by the governments of the several States, it does not even say that it is established by the people of the several States; but it pronounces that it is established by the people of the United State
acceded to it evidence of the Constitution itself and of contemporary records. I have habitually spoken of the federal Constitution as a compact, and of the parties to it as sovereign states. These terms should not, and in earlier times would not, have required explanation or vindication. But they have been called in question by the modern school of consolidation. These gentlemen admit that the government under the Articles of Confederation was a compact. Webster, in his rejoinder to Hayne on January 27, 1830, said: When the gentleman says the Constitution is a compact between the States, he uses language exactly applicable to the old Confederation. He speaks as if he were in Congress before 1789. He describes fully that old state of things then existing. The Confederation was, in strictness, a compact; the States, as States, were parties to it. We had no other General Government. But that was found insufficient and inadequate to the public exigencies. The people were
e history of Fort Sumter during the remaining period, until the organization of the Confederate government, may be found in the correspondence given in the Appendix. Ibid. From this it will be seen that the authorities of South Carolina still continued to refrain from any act of aggression or retaliation, under the provocation of the secret attempt to reenforce the garrison, as they had previously under that of its nocturnal transfer from one fort to another. Another commissioner (the Hon. I. W. Hayne) was sent to Washington by the governor of South Carolina to effect, if possible, an amicable and peaceful transfer of the fort, and settlement of all questions relating to property. This commissioner remained for nearly a month, endeavoring to accomplish the objects of his mission, but was met only by evasive and unsatisfactory answers, and eventually returned without having effected anything. There is one passage in the last letter of Colonel Hayne to the President which present
f the United States within Fort Sumter, the Hon. I. W. Hayne, who will hand you this communication, the State Department of South Carolina to Hon. I. W. Hayne State of South Carolina, Executive Offiletters of Senators of seceding States to Hon. I. W. Hayne Washington City, January 15, 1861. Hon.Hon. Isaac W. Hayne. sir: We are apprised that you visit Washington, as an envoy from the State of Shn Slidell, J. P. Benjamin. letter of Hon. I. W. Hayne in reply to Senators from seceding Statesrofound esteem, Your obedient servant, Isaac W. Hayne, Envoy from the Governor and Council of SW. Hayne Washington, January 23, 1861. Hon. Isaac W. Hayne. Sir: In answer to your letter of th to their respective States. Letter of Hon. I. W. Hayne to Senators of seceding States To the Hon Governor and Council of South Carolina. Mr. Hayne to the President of the United States Washegotiation were terminated by the retirement from Washington of Colonel Hayne on February 8, 1861. [6 more...]
armed force against states, 151. Hamlin, —, 42, 44. Handy, Judge, 287. Hardee, General, 351. Harney, Gen. William S., 356, 357, 361. Agreement with Gen. Price, 358-60. Harpers Ferry, Va. Evacuation, 284-85, 296. Harris, Dr., 327. Gov. of Tennessee, 350. Reply to U. S. call for troops, 354. Harrison, William Henry (governor of Indiana territory). Letters to Congress, 5, 6. Pres. U. S., 52. Hartford Convention, 63-64. Hartstein, Captain, 234. Hayne, Isaac W., 110, 115, 187. Extract of letter to Buchanan, 187-88. Correspondence concerning Fort Sumter, 540-51. Henry, Patrick, 147, 380. Opposition to Constitution, 94, 104, 105, 106, 109. Hicks, Gov. of Maryland, 287, 289. Extract from address stating position of Maryland, 287-88. Proclamation to preserve peace, 288. Final message to state legislature, 292. Higginson, —, 61. Hill, Col. A. P., 298. Col. D. H., 297. Hinks, Charles D., 291. Holmes, General, 319, 3
uthorized the firing on a transport bearing the United States flag, was answered in the affirmative. Soon afterwards Governor Pickens formally summoned Major Anderson to surrender Fort Sumter to the State authorities. This Major Anderson refused to do, but offered to refer the matter to his government, at Washington. As a proof of the conciliatory spirit still animating both the people and the authorities of South Carolina, Governor Pickens acceded to this request, and the Honorable Isaac W. Hayne was accordingly sent to Washington, with power to act in the premises. Protracted negotiations ensued, but brought about no satisfactory result, the answer of Mr. Holt, the new Secretary of War, leaving but little hope of an amicable settlement. Thus, under these perplexing circumstances, with an earnest desire for peace, but with insufficient courage to avow and promote it, Mr. Buchanan's administration came to a close. Congress had been as irresolute as the President himself, and
Brigadier-General Ellison Capers, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 5, South Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Chapter 3: (search)
rive its heroic defenders from the field. Gregg lost 829 (estimated) killed and wounded. The severest losses in the brigade fell on the Rifles, the Fourteenth and the Twelfth. The Rifles lost 319, the Fourteenth, 291, and the Twelfth, 155. At one time every one of the color-guards of the First volunteers was shot down around Colonel Hamilton, who took the colors. The color-bearer, Sergeant Taylor, fell with the colors in his grasp, as he was planting them forward of the line, and Corporal Hayne, seeing Colonel Hamilton take the flag, seized it, and gallantly going forward, fell mortally wounded. Private Spillman, of Company K, then took the flag and carried it to the final charge in triumph to victory. He was promoted color-bearer on the field for gallant conduct. Among the lamented dead of the First was the gallant and accomplished Lieut.-Col. A. M. Smith, who left a sick bed to take his place in his country's service. In the Twelfth, Colonel Barnes was wounded, but did no
Brigadier-General Ellison Capers, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 5, South Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Chapter 17: (search)
es. These troops were detachments from the First and Second artillery, Company B, siege train; First cavalry, First infantry (regulars), Kirk's and Peeples' squadrons of cavalry and Harrison's and Bonaud's Georgians, the South Carolina officers commanding being Major Manigault, Major Blanding, Capts. R. P. Smith, Dickson, Warley, Rivers, Witherspoon, Burnet, Humbert, Stallings, Kennedy, Porcher Smith and Trezevant. The Stono batteries, under Majors Lucas and Blanding, were commanded by Captains Hayne, Richardson, Rhett, King, Lieutenants Ogier (specially distinguished), Martin, Reveley, Lucas, Ford and Stuart. Lieutenant-Colonel Brown at Fort Lamar, and the light batteries under Captain Wheaton, did good service, and Colonels Black, Frederick and Rhett were faithful and efficient in their duties commanding on the east and west and in reserve. On the 8th Colonel Harrison, with his brigade, was sent to the assistance of Gen. B. H. Robertson, commanding on John's island. The latte
1 2