hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition. 283 3 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 94 2 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 4, 15th edition. 46 0 Browse Search
Benjamin Cutter, William R. Cutter, History of the town of Arlington, Massachusetts, ormerly the second precinct in Cambridge, or District of Menotomy, afterward the town of West Cambridge. 1635-1879 with a genealogical register of the inhabitants of the precinct. 28 0 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 1, Colonial and Revolutionary Literature: Early National Literature: Part I (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 28 0 Browse Search
Edward H. Savage, author of Police Recollections; Or Boston by Daylight and Gas-Light ., Boston events: a brief mention and the date of more than 5,000 events that transpired in Boston from 1630 to 1880, covering a period of 250 years, together with other occurrences of interest, arranged in alphabetical order 15 1 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 2 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 8 0 Browse Search
Historic leaves, volume 5, April, 1906 - January, 1907 6 0 Browse Search
Historic leaves, volume 7, April, 1908 - January, 1909 5 1 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 3 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 4 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition.. You can also browse the collection for Thomas Hutchinson or search for Thomas Hutchinson in all documents.

Your search returned 143 results in 19 document sections:

eedingly valuable ones, of Garth a Member of Parliament and Agent for South Carolina; and specimens of the Correspondence of Knox and Franklin, as Agents of Georgia. Analogous to these are the confidential communications which passed between Hutchinson and Israel Mauduit and Thomas Whately; between one of the Proprietaries of Pennsylvania and Deputy Governor Hamilton; between Cecil Calvert and Hugh Hammersley, successive Secretaries of Maryland, and Lieutenant Governor Sharpe; between Ex-Gove Pownall and Dr. Cooper of Boston; between Hollis and Mayhew and Andrew Eliot of Boston. Of all these I have copies. Of the letter-books and drafts of letters of men in office, I had access to those of Bernard for a single year; to those of Hutchinson for many years; to that of Dr. Johnson, the patriarch of the American Episcopal Church, with Archbishop Secker; to those of Colden; to those of Lieutenant Governor Sharpe. Many letters of their correspondents also fell within my reach. For
Henceforth its watchword was union, which the rash conduct of the dismayed Hutchinson to Richard Jackson, 11 June, 1766. officers of the crown contributed to estab, at the choice of the Council, the four Judges of the Supreme Court, of whom Hutchinson was the Chief, the King's Attorney, and Oliver, the Secretary and late Stamp-wn officers, and from the whole number of twenty-eight he rejected six Thomas Hutchinson to his son, then in England, 29 May, 1766. of the ablest friends of the peen conciliatory—sought to constrain Chap. XXV.} 1766. May. the election of Hutchinson, Oliver, and two others, Bernard to the Lords of Trade, 7 July, 1766. and them again Bernard to Lords of Trade, 7 July, 1766. to choose among others Hutchinson, whom, after thirty years uninterrupted concern in public affairs, the thoughpation of Chief Justice and Judge of Probate, had plunged into melancholy, Hutchinson to Bollan, 2 June, 1766. he added, The fate of the Province is put in a scale
nisters, who had designed to adopt a system of lenity. They proposed to remove Bernard from Massachusetts, in favor of Hutchinson, Thos. Hutchinson, jr., to Thos. Hutchinson, July, 1766. whom Conway had been duped into believing a friend to colonThos. Hutchinson, jr., to Thos. Hutchinson, July, 1766. whom Conway had been duped into believing a friend to colonial liberty. Reviving against Spain the claim for the ransom of the Manillas, they suggested in lieu of it a cession of the island of New Orleans; though the Spanish ambassador took fire at the thought, saying, New Orleans is the key to Mexico. Thos. Hutchinson, July, 1766. whom Conway had been duped into believing a friend to colonial liberty. Reviving against Spain the claim for the ransom of the Manillas, they suggested in lieu of it a cession of the island of New Orleans; though the Spanish ambassador took fire at the thought, saying, New Orleans is the key to Mexico. Durand to Choiseul, 27 June, 1766. With equally vain endeavors, they were forming new and milder instructions for the government of Canada, Hardwicke's Memorial. in the hope to combine respect for the municipal customs and religion of its old inhaeft their body for an Earldom. He would have humbled the aristocracy; and the nobility not only hated him Bollan to Hutchinson, 25 Sept. 1766. with vindictive arrogance, but retained strength to overwhelm him, whenever he should lose the favor of
mpare Oliver to Whately, 7 May, 1767. and of Hutchinson. Hutchinson to R. Jackson, introducing PaHutchinson to R. Jackson, introducing Paxton; date not given, but evidently of Oct. 1766. We are drawing near the measures which compell as one day or other he will make appear. Hutchinson to J. Williams, of Hatfield, 7 Dec. 1766; and J. Williams in reply, 5 Jan. 1767. Hutchinson to Charles Paxton, then in London, Dec. 1766. The Ro cry, No Representation, no Legislation. Hutchinson's History of Massachusetts, III. 164. Havinge exercised the prerogative of clemency; and Hutchinson, saying beggars must not be choosers, gave tsome ex planatory publication by Hawley, Hutchinson to Bollan, 31 Oct. 1767; same to another, 10 1766. The debates unmasked the hypocrisy of Hutchinson; and roused the public to a sense of danger icular Agent. This is the time from which Hutchinson dated the revolt of the Colonies; and his coence and advice conformed to the opinion. Hutchinson's History, III. 173. The revolt of the Colon[1 more...]
The day after Townshend braved his colleagues Chap. Xxviii} 1767. Jan. the Legislature of Massachusetts convened. Hutchinson, having received his compensation as a sufferer by the riots, restrained his ambition no longer, and took a seat in thee Attorney General in England, cited in a Minute relative to Massachusetts Bay, 1767. yet Bernard, as the accomplice of Hutchinson, urged the interposition of the central Government. Men feared more and more the system which Feb Paxton had gone tforeign relations, and impressed with the necessity of giving up trifles that created uneasiness, Richard Jackson to Hutchinson, Jan. 1767. Shelburne proceeded diligently to make himself master of each American Paper indorsed, Things to be consColony against another, he directed that it should be definitively settled; and Massachusetts did not scruple to place Hutchinson at the head of its boundary Com- Chap. Xxviii} 1767. Feb. mission. Shelburne to Bernard, 11 Dec. 1766; Bernard to S
a state of delinquency; Israel Mauduit to Hutchinson, 11 April, 1767. and receding from his old on connection with Israel Mauduit's Letter to Hutchinson of 11 April, 1767. On the tenth of Aprilheir disjunction must produce. Mauduit to Hutchinson, 11 April, 1767; Note to Hutchinson's Hist. Hutchinson's Hist. III. 171. All that he said carried conviction to the House of Lords, Extract of a letter frornard, Bernard to Shelburne, 6 May, 1767. Hutchinson, Chap XXIX.} 1767. April. and Oliver, Oe of a small standing army. The opinions of Hutchinson were of peculiar importance, for while he ass veto, he would always keep places open for Hutchinson and Oliver. Bernard's Letters on the Rejection of Hutchinson and Oliver; but particularly, Bernard to Shelburne, 6 June, 1767. The menace wasy of the Writs of Assistance first issued by Hutchinson; and while it was even suggested by one persS. Johnson to Jared Ingersoll, 16 May, 1767. Hutchinson, Oliver, Howard, and others, he moved an Add[1 more...]
othing imported from Great Britain. Compare Letter of Hutchinson, 18 July, 1767. The Fourteenth of August was commemorateo slavery be named rebellion, Israel Manduit to Lieut. Gov. Hutchinson, London, 10 Dec. 1767. That treasonable letter to a regiment, said Paxton in England, Compare Bollan to Hutchinson, 11 August, 1767. are needed to ensure tranquillity. Gazette of 5 Oct. 1767. 653, 2, 2, Compare N. Rogers to Hutchinson, London, 30 Dec. 1767. is the law of God, irreversible its of Boston, ever sensitive to the sound of Liberty, Hutchinson to [T. Pownall, probably,] 10 Nov. 1767. assembled on thXX.} 1767. Oct. vince and also to the other Colonies. Hutchinson to [T. Pownall,] 10 Nov. 1767. Bernard to Shelburne, 30 The prospect of having their avarice gratified, blinded Hutchinson and Bernard. The latter reported that the faction daredn for loyalty. Our incendiaries seem discouraged, wrote Hutchinson; and as he travelled the Circuit, he spread it through t
Dec. 1767, in Works, VII. 369. N. Rogers to Hutchinson, 30 Dec. 1767. Miscellaneous letters ascribfton also had accepted. Israel Mauduit to Hutchinson, 15 Dec. 1767. Nor be it left unnoticed,oard. In him, boasted Mauduit to his client, Hutchinson, we have gained a fresh accession in strength. I. Mauduit to Hutchinson, 10 Dec. 1767. He is my fast friend, and has never yet failed me in ah Great Britain as possible; N. Rogers to Hutchinson, London, 30 Dec. 1766. and the moment they cting Massachusetts was marked by duplicity. Hutchinson, through Mauduit, his agent, and Jenkinson, e Commissioners of the Customs at Boston. Hutchinson to Hillsborough, 18 April, 1768. I have goodrch, 1768. and volcanic flashes Letter of Hutchinson, of 17 Feb. 1768. of eloquence, than framed o the contemporary letters of Bernard and of Hutchinson, and the History of Hutchinson, and the biogHutchinson, and the biography of Eliot, attribute generally many Massachusetts State Papers to the pen of Samuel Adams, but
n of their fisheries. Nathaniel Rogers to Hutchinson, 27 Feb. 1768. Some of the Ministry went far bad qualities. I told the Grand Jury, said Hutchinson, almost in plain words, that they might depeOaths and the laws have lost their force, Hutchinson to the Duke of Grafton, 27 March, 1768. HutHutchinson to Richard Jackson, 23 March, 1768. wrote Hutchinson; while the people were overjoyed, CoHutchinson; while the people were overjoyed, Compare A. Eliot to T. Hollis, 18 April, 1768. Hutchinson's Hist. of Massachusetts, III. 184. and thHutchinson's Hist. of Massachusetts, III. 184. and the honest and independent Grand Jurors became the favorite toast of the Sons of Liberty. On the dahe people. To keep the balance even, argued Hutchinson, there is need of aid from the other side of the water. Hutchinson to Thos. Pownall, 23 Feb. 1768. How to induce the British Government tnd in the evening, these are Hutchinson's Hutchinson to Richard Jackson, 23 March, 1768. words, wh no man as yet has that in his thoughts. Hutchinson to the Duke of Grafton, 27 March, 1768. [2 more...]
fuse to comply, it is the King's pleasure that you should immediately dissolve them. Hillsborough to Bernard, 22 April, 1768. In America, the best informed of the Crown Officers attributed the instruction to the express order of the King. Hutchinson to Bernard, 4 August, 1770. The Agent of the Assembly of Massachusetts interceded for the Colony. Its Petition was received by Hillsborough for the King's perusal, but was never officially presented. It has been resolved in Council, said ement from its sister Colonies, its Crown officers continued and extended their solicitations in England for large and fixed salaries, as the only way to keep the Americans in their dependence. Grenville's influence was the special resource of Hutchinson and Oliver, Oliver to Thomas Whately, 11 May, 1768. who had supported his Stamp Act and suffered as its martyrs; and they relied on Whately to secure for them his attention and favor; which they valued the more, as it seemed to them probable