hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 6,437 1 Browse Search
Richard Hakluyt, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques, and Discoveries of the English Nation 1,858 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 766 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 310 0 Browse Search
Admiral David D. Porter, The Naval History of the Civil War. 302 0 Browse Search
Raphael Semmes, Memoirs of Service Afloat During the War Between the States 300 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 266 0 Browse Search
Henry Morton Stanley, Dorothy Stanley, The Autobiography of Sir Henry Morton Stanley 224 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 5, 13th edition. 222 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 214 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: December 17, 1860., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for England (United Kingdom) or search for England (United Kingdom) in all documents.

Your search returned 10 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: December 17, 1860., [Electronic resource], Secession movement at the South. (search)
e of South Carolina as an independent Power. We extract as follows: "The Mercury commits some obvious, though not unnatural errors. Vessels sailing from Charleston for Liverpool or Havre, after as before the 18th December, will be required before they can discharge cargo in either of those ports to present a proper clearance, signed by a United States officer. If they have no such clearance they will probably be seized and detained as suspicious craft. Neither the Government of Great Britain nor that of France will recognize any South Carolina collectors. South Carolina is not and will not for some time be known in Europe as an independent nation. And any vessel which goes to sea under her flag, and with papers signed only by her officials, will be a lawful prize by any cruiser, and will not be suffered to enter any commercial port. Until the Government of the United States shall recognize the independence of South Carolina, she can not carry on any foreign trade with any
The Daily Dispatch: December 17, 1860., [Electronic resource], Secession movement at the South. (search)
The Colonies of Great Britain. The Colonial Constitutions and Defences of Great Britain form the subject Great Britain form the subject of a very instructive article in a late number of the North British Review. We condense some of the prominent facts: The Colonies of Great Britain are fifty in number, and cost the Imperial Government more than three ounded on the commerce of the United States with Great Britain, that the trade would exist independently of thean the United States. The exports received from Great Britain by Australia are, as compared with its populatioved by the United States are less than one. Great Britain alone among modern States has retained a large pvern." Her vast colonial dominion is now held to Great Britain by the ties of gratitude and affection, and, whi a direct trade through the Canadian waters with Great Britain. A scheme said to be founded on the soundest dafrican will not labor." It is quite natural that Great Britain should desire to reduce the Southern States of A