hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 32 0 Browse Search
Timothy Webster 14 0 Browse Search
Hector Davis 12 0 Browse Search
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
California (California, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
H. Powell 10 0 Browse Search
Liberia (Liberia) 10 0 Browse Search
Charles Baker 10 0 Browse Search
Paraje (New Mexico, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 30, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 3 total hits in 3 results.

Colonel Wm. C Scotts. We have read the defence of this gentleman, addressed to a Court of Enquiry, which was summoned with regard to his conduct in the Rich Mountain affair. He appears to us to have acted throughout with the strictest regard to military rule, and in obedience to all orders which it was possible to executes. The censure to which he was subjected in the public mind we believe to have arisen from ignorance of the circumstances, and was highly unjust. Col. Scott sustains all his statements by indisputable evidence. In our judgment his defence is complete.
Colonel Wm. C Scotts. We have read the defence of this gentleman, addressed to a Court of Enquiry, which was summoned with regard to his conduct in the Rich Mountain affair. He appears to us to have acted throughout with the strictest regard to military rule, and in obedience to all orders which it was possible to executes. The censure to which he was subjected in the public mind we believe to have arisen from ignorance of the circumstances, and was highly unjust. Col. Scott sustains all his statements by indisputable evidence. In our judgment his defence is complete.
Colonel Wm. C Scotts. We have read the defence of this gentleman, addressed to a Court of Enquiry, which was summoned with regard to his conduct in the Rich Mountain affair. He appears to us to have acted throughout with the strictest regard to military rule, and in obedience to all orders which it was possible to executes. The censure to which he was subjected in the public mind we believe to have arisen from ignorance of the circumstances, and was highly unjust. Col. Scott sustains all his statements by indisputable evidence. In our judgment his defence is complete.