hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) | 32 | 0 | Browse | Search |
G. T. Beauregard | 24 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Washington Morgan | 21 | 1 | Browse | Search |
McClellan | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
William B. Mumford | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Abraham Lincoln | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Halleck | 10 | 4 | Browse | Search |
Chickahominy (Virginia, United States) | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
W. B. Bates | 9 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 24, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 29 total hits in 12 results.
Twentymile Creek (Mississippi, United States) (search for this): article 23
Farmington (Mississippi, United States) (search for this): article 23
Haileck (search for this): article 23
Halleck's misrepresentations — Beauregard's Reply.
We copy from the Mobile Evening News the communication of Gen. Beauregard.
to which brief allusion has been made through the medium of the telegraph.
It will be seen that the opinion heretofore expressed with regard to the falsity of Gen. Haileck's dispatches, is fully sustained by this straight-forward statement:
Headq'rs Western Department, June 17th, 1862. Gentlemen:
My attention has just been called to the following dispatch (published in your issue of yesterday) of Major-General Halleck, commanding enemy's forces, which, coming from such a source, is most remarkable in one respect — that it contains as many misrepresentations as lines:
Washington, June 4. 1862.--The following dispatch was received this afternoon at the War Department:
Halleck's Headquarters, June 4, 1862. Hon. E. M. Stanton, Secretary of War:
Gen. Pope, with 40,000 men, is thirty miles south of Corinth, pushing the enemy ha
E. M. Stanton (search for this): article 23
G. T. Beauregard (search for this): article 23
Halleck's misrepresentations — Beauregard's Reply.
We copy from the Mobile Evening News the communication of Gen. Beauregard.
to which brief allusion has been made through the medium of the telGen. Beauregard.
to which brief allusion has been made through the medium of the telegraph.
It will be seen that the opinion heretofore expressed with regard to the falsity of Gen. Haileck's dispatches, is fully sustained by this straight-forward statement:
Headq'rs Western s captured.
Thousands of the enemy are throwing away their arms.
A farmer says that when Beauregard learned that Col. Elliott bad cut the railroad on his line of retreat he became frantic, and t He ought to know that the burning of two or more cars on a railroad is not sufficient to make "Beauregard frantic" and ridiculous!
especially when I expected every moment to hear of the capture of hi of the like opinion.
I attest that all we lost at Corinth and during the retreat would not amount to one day's expenses of his army.
Respectfully, your ob't serv't,
G. T. Beauregard.
Pope (search for this): article 23
W. M. Elliott (search for this): article 23
Halleck (search for this): article 23
Halleck's misrepresentations — Beauregard's Reply.
We copy from the Mobile Evening News the communication of Gen. Beauregard.
to which brief allusion has been made through the medium of the telegraph.
It will be seen that the opinion heretof lemen:
My attention has just been called to the following dispatch (published in your issue of yesterday) of Major-General Halleck, commanding enemy's forces, which, coming from such a source, is most remarkable in one respect — that it contain he actual number of prisoners taken during the retreat was about equal on both sides, and they were but few.
Major General Halleck must be a very credulous man indeed to believe the absurd story of "that farmer," He ought to know that the burni sly consumed in the station-house!
Let Col. Elliott's name descend to infamy as the author of such a revolting deed.
Gen. Halleck did not capture nins locomotives.
It was only by the accidental destruction of a bridge before some trains had passed
4th (search for this): article 23
June 4th, 1862 AD (search for this): article 23