hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3 309 19 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 2 309 19 Browse Search
General Horace Porter, Campaigning with Grant 170 20 Browse Search
J. B. Jones, A Rebel War Clerk's Diary 117 33 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 65 11 Browse Search
Edward Porter Alexander, Military memoirs of a Confederate: a critical narrative 62 2 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 36 2 Browse Search
William Tecumseh Sherman, Memoirs of General William T. Sherman . 34 12 Browse Search
Fitzhugh Lee, General Lee 29 3 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 29 3 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: November 8, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Butler or search for Butler in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 1 document section:

nt of the United States. A letter from New Orleans to the New York Herald says: These three gentlemen having persistently refused to read the prayer for the President of the United States, as set forth in the liturgy of the church, and General Butler regarding their presence in New Orleans as highly prejudicial to the development of the Union sentiment, he has sent them, in charge of Captain Puffer, of his staff, to Fort Lafayette. Captain Puffer is also special bearer of dispatches from General Butler to the departments at Washington. Your readers may remember that it was at Dr. Leacock's church where there was a disgraceful ebullition of secessionism on the occasion of the funeral of Lt. DeKay. I do not wish to imply that Dr. Leacock was responsible for the conduct of the people in his church that day, for his offence lay only in his irresolution and vacillation, he having first agreed to read the service over the body, and afterwards, at the remonstrance of his church m