hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 2, 17th edition. 12 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore) 11 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 12. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 7 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 4 0 Browse Search
A Roster of General Officers , Heads of Departments, Senators, Representatives , Military Organizations, &c., &c., in Confederate Service during the War between the States. (ed. Charles C. Jones, Jr. Late Lieut. Colonel of Artillery, C. S. A.) 3 1 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Harvard Memorial Biographies 2 0 Browse Search
Wendell Phillips, Theodore C. Pease, Speeches, Lectures and Letters of Wendell Phillips: Volume 1 2 0 Browse Search
Col. O. M. Roberts, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 12.1, Alabama (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 2 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 2 2 Browse Search
Colonel William Preston Johnston, The Life of General Albert Sidney Johnston : His Service in the Armies of the United States, the Republic of Texas, and the Confederate States. 2 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: September 3, 1863., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Jeffries or search for Jeffries in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

e that he could not be instructed; none so ignorant that he might not instruct. Let it be known that neither the powers of reason nor the voice of admonition from counsel could ever be heard in this Court except as a matter of favor, graciously allowed by the Court, and where, then, would be the guarantee, to the most innocent and virtuous, against the villainy, conspiracy and craftiness, of the vile and the depraved? History preserved for the execration of mankind the memory of a Jeffries and Williams, who had disgraced humanity and fixed an indelible stain on English jurisprudence by their tyranny on the bench and their exclusion of all proper defence. Where the difference between denying the right to be heard and the resulting consequences? There must be the right on the part of the accused, and the consequent absence of the power to deny on the part of the Court, or all conservatism was at an end. To deny this right and claim this power here would equal the high-ha