hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
L. Polk 14 0 Browse Search
J. H. Toombs 12 0 Browse Search
William T. Glassell 11 1 Browse Search
J. W. Cannon 10 0 Browse Search
Lincoln 10 0 Browse Search
Juan J. Williams 10 0 Browse Search
Leonidas Polk 9 1 Browse Search
Benjamin Bragg 9 1 Browse Search
Hindman 8 6 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 12, 1863., [Electronic resource].

Found 397 total hits in 225 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ...
L. Polk (search for this): article 10
nges we get the two following explanations of the charges against Gens. Polk and Hindman. About Gen. Polk, it is stated: On the 18th of Gen. Polk, it is stated: On the 18th of September Gen. Polk was ordered to instruct Gen. Hill to commence the attack on the morning of the 19th by daylight, in order to flank the enGen. Polk was ordered to instruct Gen. Hill to commence the attack on the morning of the 19th by daylight, in order to flank the enemy and cut him off from Chattanooga. Gen. Polk accordingly sent the order to Gen. Hill, who could not be found, after diligent search, untiGen. Polk accordingly sent the order to Gen. Hill, who could not be found, after diligent search, until next morning. It seems that at the time Gen. Hill, with a part of his division, was at Tedford's Ford, on the Chickamauga, and did not comn. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, mes says: During, or immediately preceding, the late battle, Gen. Polk sent an order to General Hindman by the hands of a courier, whichier, Gen. Hindman refusing, or neglecting to carry out the order, Gen. Polk dispatched a member of his staff on the same mission, and that on
Hill (search for this): article 10
Gens. Polk and Hindman. About Gen. Polk, it is stated: On the 18th of September Gen. Polk was ordered to instruct Gen. Hill to commence the attack on the morning of the 19th by daylight, in order to flank the enemy and cut him off from Chattanooga. Gen. Polk accordingly sent the order to Gen. Hill, who could not be found, after diligent search, until next morning. It seems that at the time Gen. Hill, with a part of his division, was at Tedford's Ford, on the Chickamauga, and did not coGen. Hill, with a part of his division, was at Tedford's Ford, on the Chickamauga, and did not come up until the night of the day the order was to be executed. Gen. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, the Columbus (Ga.) Times says: DuringGen. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, the Columbus (Ga.) Times says: During, or immediately preceding, the late battle, Gen. Polk sent an order to General Hindman by the hands of a courier, which was not executed. In explanation of his non-action Gen. Hindman avers that he never received the order; the courier affirms tha
Gen (search for this): article 10
ntil the night of the day the order was to be executed. Gen. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, the Columbus (Ga.) Times says: During, or immediately preceding, the late battle, Gen. Polk sent an order to General Hindman by the hands of a courier, which was not executed. In explanation of his non-action Gen. Hindman avers that he never received the order; the courier affirms that he did, and that he is able to prove it, and it is to try the issue thus joined that the parties have repaired to Atlanta. We hear from another source that after the return of the courier, Gen. Hindman refusing, or neglecting to carry out the order, Gen. Polk dispatched a member of his staff on the same mission, and that on receiving the order, Gen. Hindman cursed Gen, Pok and his whole staff, and refused to obey it, and that in consequence of this conduct Gen. Hindman has been placed under arrest.
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 10
ntil the night of the day the order was to be executed. Gen. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, the Columbus (Ga.) Times says: During, or immediately preceding, the late battle, Gen. Polk sent an order to General Hindman by the hands of a courier, which was not executed. In explanation of his non-action Gen. Hindman avers that he never received the order; the courier affirms that he did, and that he is able to prove it, and it is to try the issue thus joined that the parties have repaired to Atlanta. We hear from another source that after the return of the courier, Gen. Hindman refusing, or neglecting to carry out the order, Gen. Polk dispatched a member of his staff on the same mission, and that on receiving the order, Gen. Hindman cursed Gen, Pok and his whole staff, and refused to obey it, and that in consequence of this conduct Gen. Hindman has been placed under arrest.
Columbus (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 10
nemy and cut him off from Chattanooga. Gen. Polk accordingly sent the order to Gen. Hill, who could not be found, after diligent search, until next morning. It seems that at the time Gen. Hill, with a part of his division, was at Tedford's Ford, on the Chickamauga, and did not come up until the night of the day the order was to be executed. Gen. Hill, we also learn from the same authority, wholly exonerates Gen. Polk from all blame in the matter. Of Gen. Hindman's difficulty, the Columbus (Ga.) Times says: During, or immediately preceding, the late battle, Gen. Polk sent an order to General Hindman by the hands of a courier, which was not executed. In explanation of his non-action Gen. Hindman avers that he never received the order; the courier affirms that he did, and that he is able to prove it, and it is to try the issue thus joined that the parties have repaired to Atlanta. We hear from another source that after the return of the courier, Gen. Hindman refusing, or ne
Elzey (search for this): article 10
The Military Review by Gen. Elzey, of the local forces, on Saturday last, drew together an immense assemblage of persons of all ages, and proved to be highly creditable to the officers and privates. The men were well dressed and well armed, and the various manœuvres through which they passed showed that they were also well drilled, and would prove equal to any emergency that might occur. Gen. E. must have felt proud of his command, as it passed in review, every man and officer appearing to the best advantage.
1807 AD (search for this): article 11
A French Waterloo General. --The Paris papers announce the death of Gen. Rulteire, at the age of seventy-six. The deceased General entered the army in 1807, and was severely wounded at Waterloo. In 1837 he was made a General of division. He was also created a Peer of France, and was Minister of War when Louis Napoleon was President of the Republic.
1837 AD (search for this): article 11
A French Waterloo General. --The Paris papers announce the death of Gen. Rulteire, at the age of seventy-six. The deceased General entered the army in 1807, and was severely wounded at Waterloo. In 1837 he was made a General of division. He was also created a Peer of France, and was Minister of War when Louis Napoleon was President of the Republic.
Louis Napoleon (search for this): article 11
A French Waterloo General. --The Paris papers announce the death of Gen. Rulteire, at the age of seventy-six. The deceased General entered the army in 1807, and was severely wounded at Waterloo. In 1837 he was made a General of division. He was also created a Peer of France, and was Minister of War when Louis Napoleon was President of the Republic.
Rulteire (search for this): article 11
A French Waterloo General. --The Paris papers announce the death of Gen. Rulteire, at the age of seventy-six. The deceased General entered the army in 1807, and was severely wounded at Waterloo. In 1837 he was made a General of division. He was also created a Peer of France, and was Minister of War when Louis Napoleon was President of the Republic.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ...