hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Troy (Turkey) | 256 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Rome (Italy) | 90 | 0 | Browse | Search |
1859 AD | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
1844 AD | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
1858 AD | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
700 BC | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
1470 AD | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
212 BC | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
July 25th, 1844 AD | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in John Conington, Commentary on Vergil's Aeneid, Volume 1.
Found 527 total hits in 168 results.
Rome (Italy) (search for this): book 1, commline 1
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 4, commline 102
Communem is a predicate, and
so is coupled with paribus auspiciis, expressing
how Juno and Venus are to govern
Carthage. In paribus auspiciis the reference
is to the phrase auspicia habere,
which signifies that Roman magistrates
alone during their time of office had authority
to take the auspices, so that the
words here mean no more than with joint
authority. The words are repeated 7. 256,
paribusque in regna vocari Auspiciis,
where they are to be constructed with
regna rather than with vocariāto
be called by fate to an equal share of empire.
Lersch (Antiqq. Vergg. pp. 4, 5)
rightly calls attention to the parallel between
the proposed union of Carthage and
Troy here and that nearly consummated
between Latium and Troy in Book 12,
suggesting that Virg. took the hint from
the legendary union of the Sabines and the
Romans. Serv. seems quite wrong in supposing
the reference here to be magistrates
appointed by equal auspices such as the
consuls
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 3, commline 105
The existence of a mount Ida is
adduced to prove that Troy was colonized
from Crete. Cunabula of a birthplace,
Prop. 4. 1. 27, Idaeum Simoenta, Iovis
cunabula parvi.
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 2, commline 11
Supremum laborem, its destruction,
as dies supremus is the day of
death, and sors suprema (5. 190) the
final doom. Claud. Eutrop. 2. 289, Phrygiae
casus venisse supremos. Labor by
itself means no more than po/nos or mo/xqos
in Greek, sorrow or suffering, 1. 597.,
2. 362., 4. 78., 9. 202. To hear the brief
tale of Troy's last agony.
1859 AD (search for this): book 4, commline 11
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 1, commline 113
Oronten: Med. and Gud. here,
and in 6. 334 (in the latter passage Rom.
also), have Orontem. But the analogy
of other words of the sort formed from the
Greek, as written in the best MSS. of
Virg., is in favour of Oronten; which is
supported too by Charisius (see on v. 220),
and defended by Wagn. (Q. V. 3); who
however does not appear altogether consistent
in adopting im as the accus. of
names in is, though the best MSS. support
him. Fidus is a natural epithet of
an ally who had followed the fortunes of
Troy, not only during the siege, but in
exile.
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 3, commline 119
Neptune and Apollo are the tutelary
deities of Troy; and there is a further
reason for invoking them here, the one as
the god of the sea, the other as having
given the oracle. A bull is sacrificed to
Neptune 2. 202, promised to the sea-gods
5. 235 foll. Pulcher Apollo E. 4. 57.
Comp. Il. 11. 727, tau=ron d' *)alfeiw=|, tau=ron
de\ *poseida/wni.
700 BC (search for this): book 5, commline 119
Urbis opus is a singular expression
for urbis instar. Stat. Theb. 6. 86
imitates it, calling a funeral pile montis
opus, if the reading is certain, and again
Silv. 2. 2. 31, Inde per obliquas erepit
porticus arces, Urbis opus, which however
the commentators explain opus urbe dignum.
Gossrau comp. Cic. Verr. 5. 34,
Quae (navis) si in praedonum pugna
versaretur, urbis instar habere inter illos
piraticos myoparones videretur. Cerda
comp. 8. 691, of the battle of Actium,
pelago credas innare revolsas Cycladas,
aut montis concurrere montibus altos,
where however see note. Versus of a tier
of oars, Livy 23. 30. Virg. has been
guilty of an anachronism, as triremes
were not invented till the historic period
(Thuc. 1. 13), about B.C. 700, at the same
time that he must have failed to impress a
notion of vastness upon his readers, who
had known ships of ten tiers at the battle
of Actium, and had heard of others of sixteen,
thirty, and even forty. See Dict. A.
Ships.
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 1, commline 12
Urbs antiqua, said with reference
to Virg.'s own age. For the parenthetical
construction Tyrii tenuere coloni,
comp. v. 530 below, Est locus, Hesperiam
Graii cognomine dicunt. Tyrii coloni,
settlers from Tyre, as Dardaniis colonis,
7. 422, are settlers from Troy.
Troy (Turkey) (search for this): book 2, commline 13
Incipiam appears rightly understood
by Henry, I will essay, rather than
I will begin. E. 5. 10, G. 1. 5, Lucr. 1.
55. So the ordinary sense of inceptum.
Fracti, nearly the same as fessi, v. 109,
but stronger. Repulsi, beaten back from
the attack on Troy.