hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 60 0 Browse Search
Florence, S. C. (South Carolina, United States) 30 0 Browse Search
Fort Donelson (Tennessee, United States) 26 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 20 0 Browse Search
Bowling Green (Indiana, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
Port Royal (South Carolina, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Wednesday Lincoln 14 0 Browse Search
France (France) 14 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 17, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 26 total hits in 8 results.

Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): article 5
e States has been held since the withdrawal of the Southern States from the old Union, there has consequently, as yet, been no change in this law — and until the assembly of some such body having authority to make laws for that portion of the church residing in the Confederate States, the canons of the general church are deemed to be binding upon her clergy — if not in conflict with the allegiance they owe their Government. The Rev. Dr. Stevens having been elected assistant Bishop of Pennsylvania, Bishops Atkinson and Otey were politely notified of the fact, and their consent to his consecration asked. The political condition of the two countries had nothing whatever to do with the question, which was purely a canonical one. As gentlemen who had been politely addressed upon a subject entirely unconnected with politics, and as those too, having respect for the existing laws of their church, these bishops deemed it their duty to reply. Their having done so, seems to have made
United States (United States) (search for this): article 5
, as the son of one of them, to take some notice of it. The facts, I presume, to be simply these: By the canons of the "Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States," each Bishop is required to consent to the consecration of every newly elected Bishop before the same can be lawfully done. As no general convention of the Church in the Confederate States has been held since the withdrawal of the Southern States from the old Union, there has consequently, as yet, been no change in this law — and until the assembly of some such body having authority to make laws for that portion of the church residing in the Confederate States, the canons of the generConfederate States, the canons of the general church are deemed to be binding upon her clergy — if not in conflict with the allegiance they owe their Government. The Rev. Dr. Stevens having been elected assistant Bishop of Pennsylvania, Bishops Atkinson and Otey were politely notified of the fact, and their consent to his consecration asked. The political condition o
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 5
Southern Bishops. Editor of the Dispatch: My attention has been recently called to an article which appeared some ten days ago in your paper, in relation to the sanction given by Bishops Atkinson of North Carolina and Otey of Tennessee, to the usual circular notice sent to all the States on the ordination of Bishop Stevens; and as it seems designed to call in question the loyalty of the gentlemen to whom it refers, I deem it my duty, as the son of one of them, to take some notice of it. The facts, I presume, to be simply these: By the canons of the "Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States," each Bishop is required to consent to the consecration of every newly elected Bishop before the same can be lawfully done. As no general convention of the Church in the Confederate States has been held since the withdrawal of the Southern States from the old Union, there has consequently, as yet, been no change in this law — and until the assembly of some such body having author
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): article 5
Southern Bishops. Editor of the Dispatch: My attention has been recently called to an article which appeared some ten days ago in your paper, in relation to the sanction given by Bishops Atkinson of North Carolina and Otey of Tennessee, to the usual circular notice sent to all the States on the ordination of Bishop Stevens; and as it seems designed to call in question the loyalty of the gentlemen to whom it refers, I deem it my duty, as the son of one of them, to take some notice of it. The facts, I presume, to be simply these: By the canons of the "Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States," each Bishop is required to consent to the consecration of every newly elected Bishop before the same can be lawfully done. As no general convention of the Church in the Confederate States has been held since the withdrawal of the Southern States from the old Union, there has consequently, as yet, been no change in this law — and until the assembly of some such body having autho
Otey (search for this): article 5
Southern Bishops. Editor of the Dispatch: My attention has been recently called to an article which appeared some ten days ago in your paper, in relation to the sanction given by Bishops Atkinson of North Carolina and Otey of Tennessee, to the usual circular notice sent to all the States on the ordination of Bishop Stevens; and as it seems designed to call in question the loyalty of the gentlemen to whom it refers, I deem it my duty, as the son of one of them, to take some notice of it. themselves nor the facts of the case as above stated. The influence which seems to have been drawn by such is most unwarranted from the facts and is utterly unjust as the friends of these bishops are well aware. Both Bishop Atkinson and Bishop Otey have spent their whole lives in the South, being both Virginians by birth, and each has furnished from his own family, soldiers, who are now in the field, fighting the battles of our beloved country, against the insolent and barbarous Northern
John Wilder Atkinson (search for this): article 5
of the Dispatch: My attention has been recently called to an article which appeared some ten days ago in your paper, in relation to the sanction given by Bishops Atkinson of North Carolina and Otey of Tennessee, to the usual circular notice sent to all the States on the ordination of Bishop Stevens; and as it seems designed to calence which seems to have been drawn by such is most unwarranted from the facts and is utterly unjust as the friends of these bishops are well aware. Both Bishop Atkinson and Bishop Otey have spent their whole lives in the South, being both Virginians by birth, and each has furnished from his own family, soldiers, who are now iand Bishop Otey have spent their whole lives in the South, being both Virginians by birth, and each has furnished from his own family, soldiers, who are now in the field, fighting the battles of our beloved country, against the insolent and barbarous Northern foe. John Wilder Atkinson, Capt. Co. A, 15th Regt. Va. Vols.
Thaddeus Stevens (search for this): article 5
ently called to an article which appeared some ten days ago in your paper, in relation to the sanction given by Bishops Atkinson of North Carolina and Otey of Tennessee, to the usual circular notice sent to all the States on the ordination of Bishop Stevens; and as it seems designed to call in question the loyalty of the gentlemen to whom it refers, I deem it my duty, as the son of one of them, to take some notice of it. The facts, I presume, to be simply these: By the canons of the "Protesng authority to make laws for that portion of the church residing in the Confederate States, the canons of the general church are deemed to be binding upon her clergy — if not in conflict with the allegiance they owe their Government. The Rev. Dr. Stevens having been elected assistant Bishop of Pennsylvania, Bishops Atkinson and Otey were politely notified of the fact, and their consent to his consecration asked. The political condition of the two countries had nothing whatever to do with
Virginians (search for this): article 5
ies had nothing whatever to do with the question, which was purely a canonical one. As gentlemen who had been politely addressed upon a subject entirely unconnected with politics, and as those too, having respect for the existing laws of their church, these bishops deemed it their duty to reply. Their having done so, seems to have made them liable to misconstruction on the part of those who neither know these gentlemen themselves nor the facts of the case as above stated. The influence which seems to have been drawn by such is most unwarranted from the facts and is utterly unjust as the friends of these bishops are well aware. Both Bishop Atkinson and Bishop Otey have spent their whole lives in the South, being both Virginians by birth, and each has furnished from his own family, soldiers, who are now in the field, fighting the battles of our beloved country, against the insolent and barbarous Northern foe. John Wilder Atkinson, Capt. Co. A, 15th Regt. Va. Vols.