hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 21 1 Browse Search
Delaware (Delaware, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Alabama (Alabama, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Jacksonville (Florida, United States) 11 1 Browse Search
Doolittle 9 5 Browse Search
J. Bankhead Magruder 9 1 Browse Search
John House 9 1 Browse Search
William M. Evans 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 1, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 5 total hits in 5 results.

ate bloody battle near Winchester, by letter writers, yet it is somewhat mortifying to my mind to see special distinctions made, when all fought so gallantly, and so nobly sustained the reputation and cause of the South. It is not only injustice to the chivalrous and gallant, but an result to modest merit that a "special" few should be the recipients of printed applause and gilded praise. The gallant Capt. S. T. Walth, of Co. K, 23d Reg't Va. Vols., whose conduct on that occasion, with his Spartan band of 43, was in every sense commendatory and gallant, has been passed over unnoticed. He now lies in the Hospital at Stanton with his left arm shattered and bruised. Our army claims not an officer of the same rank more chivalrous and competent than Captain Walto., while his men, who, within the past twelve months, have shown themselves worthy foemen of the proudestensmy's steel conducted themselves in a man or that would have done honor to the martyrs of Thermocouples. A. Jay. E.
S. T. Walth (search for this): article 8
I seen the honorable mention of the names of many of those who participated in the late bloody battle near Winchester, by letter writers, yet it is somewhat mortifying to my mind to see special distinctions made, when all fought so gallantly, and so nobly sustained the reputation and cause of the South. It is not only injustice to the chivalrous and gallant, but an result to modest merit that a "special" few should be the recipients of printed applause and gilded praise. The gallant Capt. S. T. Walth, of Co. K, 23d Reg't Va. Vols., whose conduct on that occasion, with his Spartan band of 43, was in every sense commendatory and gallant, has been passed over unnoticed. He now lies in the Hospital at Stanton with his left arm shattered and bruised. Our army claims not an officer of the same rank more chivalrous and competent than Captain Walto., while his men, who, within the past twelve months, have shown themselves worthy foemen of the proudestensmy's steel conducted themselves in
"Hener to whom honor is Due." Richmond Va., March 31st, 1862. To the Editors of the Dispatch: With much pleasure and pride have I seen the honorable mention of the names of many of those who participated in the late bloody battle near Winchester, by letter writers, yet it is somewhat mortifying to my mind to see special distinctions made, when all fought so gallantly, and so nobly sustained the reputation and cause of the South. It is not only injustice to the chivalrous and gallant, but an result to modest merit that a "special" few should be the recipients of printed applause and gilded praise. The gallant Capt. S. T. Walth, of Co. K, 23d Reg't Va. Vols., whose conduct on that occasion, with his Spartan band of 43, was in every sense commendatory and gallant, has been passed over unnoticed. He now lies in the Hospital at Stanton with his left arm shattered and bruised. Our army claims not an officer of the same rank more chivalrous and competent than Captain Walto., wh
ate bloody battle near Winchester, by letter writers, yet it is somewhat mortifying to my mind to see special distinctions made, when all fought so gallantly, and so nobly sustained the reputation and cause of the South. It is not only injustice to the chivalrous and gallant, but an result to modest merit that a "special" few should be the recipients of printed applause and gilded praise. The gallant Capt. S. T. Walth, of Co. K, 23d Reg't Va. Vols., whose conduct on that occasion, with his Spartan band of 43, was in every sense commendatory and gallant, has been passed over unnoticed. He now lies in the Hospital at Stanton with his left arm shattered and bruised. Our army claims not an officer of the same rank more chivalrous and competent than Captain Walto., while his men, who, within the past twelve months, have shown themselves worthy foemen of the proudestensmy's steel conducted themselves in a man or that would have done honor to the martyrs of Thermocouples. A. Jay. E.
March 31st, 1862 AD (search for this): article 8
"Hener to whom honor is Due." Richmond Va., March 31st, 1862. To the Editors of the Dispatch: With much pleasure and pride have I seen the honorable mention of the names of many of those who participated in the late bloody battle near Winchester, by letter writers, yet it is somewhat mortifying to my mind to see special distinctions made, when all fought so gallantly, and so nobly sustained the reputation and cause of the South. It is not only injustice to the chivalrous and gallant, but an result to modest merit that a "special" few should be the recipients of printed applause and gilded praise. The gallant Capt. S. T. Walth, of Co. K, 23d Reg't Va. Vols., whose conduct on that occasion, with his Spartan band of 43, was in every sense commendatory and gallant, has been passed over unnoticed. He now lies in the Hospital at Stanton with his left arm shattered and bruised. Our army claims not an officer of the same rank more chivalrous and competent than Captain Walto., wh