hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 48 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 30 0 Browse Search
Rosecrans 21 11 Browse Search
Braxton Bragg 20 0 Browse Search
Gen Crittenden 14 0 Browse Search
John B. Davis 12 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Canada (Canada) 10 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
McCook 10 2 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: January 7, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 12 total hits in 5 results.

United States (United States) (search for this): article 4
sive that the incoming year may demonstrate but too clearly to the world how slender is the authority which he exercises in those States which he professes to rule; and he is anxious, while there is yet time, to avoid being placed in an undignified position." The Times says: "that towards the South Mr. Lincoln's Message to Congress is less a threat than a bid for peace; that the scheme of emancipation enounced is such as we might fancy Mr. Davis and his Cabinet recommending to the Confederate States. If they were hard pressed by the enemy, and desired to gain the active good will of the European Powers; but that the Union should be restored by such a simple progress as this, and should emerge out of this great strife steadied by a debt of some three thousand millions of dollars, and purged from its curse of slavery, is we are afraid, the dream of a very weak man." It concludes its article by saying that the whole scheme is a labored substitute for the object of September last.
John B. Davis (search for this): article 4
ary, and that "the President is evidently apprehensive that the incoming year may demonstrate but too clearly to the world how slender is the authority which he exercises in those States which he professes to rule; and he is anxious, while there is yet time, to avoid being placed in an undignified position." The Times says: "that towards the South Mr. Lincoln's Message to Congress is less a threat than a bid for peace; that the scheme of emancipation enounced is such as we might fancy Mr. Davis and his Cabinet recommending to the Confederate States. If they were hard pressed by the enemy, and desired to gain the active good will of the European Powers; but that the Union should be restored by such a simple progress as this, and should emerge out of this great strife steadied by a debt of some three thousand millions of dollars, and purged from its curse of slavery, is we are afraid, the dream of a very weak man." It concludes its article by saying that the whole scheme is a labo
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 4
Lincoln's message in Europe. The comments of the English press on the annual message of President-Lincoln, are chiefly confined to the portion of that document in which is proposed the system oLincoln, are chiefly confined to the portion of that document in which is proposed the system of compensated emancipation. The London Post (Government organ) says that the message is as unsatisfactory as might have been anticipated, and that it is particularly valueless as an index of the avoid being placed in an undignified position." The Times says: "that towards the South Mr. Lincoln's Message to Congress is less a threat than a bid for peace; that the scheme of emancipation he Exeter Hall or Abolition party, says that, "in making his present proposition to Congress, Mr. Lincoln, far from revoking any of his former policy, and nullifying the proclamation of September lasst in it, though they do not bear on either the duration or issue of the war. It adds that President Lincoln nor his Congress have any power to legislate for slavery in the Southern Confederacy and i
January 1st (search for this): article 4
ent organ) says that the message is as unsatisfactory as might have been anticipated, and that it is particularly valueless as an index of the political course to be pursued by the Government. In referring to the emancipation scheme, this mourns remarks that it "clearly proves that the President has lost faith — if, indeed, he ever possessed any — in the preposterous proclamation which some months since he issued for the emancipation of all the slaves in the Southern Confederacy on the first of January, and that "the President is evidently apprehensive that the incoming year may demonstrate but too clearly to the world how slender is the authority which he exercises in those States which he professes to rule; and he is anxious, while there is yet time, to avoid being placed in an undignified position." The Times says: "that towards the South Mr. Lincoln's Message to Congress is less a threat than a bid for peace; that the scheme of emancipation enounced is such as we might fancy
September (search for this): article 4
died by a debt of some three thousand millions of dollars, and purged from its curse of slavery, is we are afraid, the dream of a very weak man." It concludes its article by saying that the whole scheme is a labored substitute for the object of September last. The London News, the organ of the Exeter Hall or Abolition party, says that, "in making his present proposition to Congress, Mr. Lincoln, far from revoking any of his former policy, and nullifying the proclamation of September last, September last, simply fulfills a pledge which he gave their that, in the next session of Congress, he would recommend a measure offering compensation to the loyal owners of slaves," and adds that "the freemen of the North have it in their power, if they are worthy of their cause, to destroy, root and branch, the monstrous growth which has cursed their country." The Manchester Guardian in its comments upon the message, remarks that there are some points of interest in it, though they do not bear on either