hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in descending order. Sort in ascending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
B. F. Butler 43 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Armstrong 14 2 Browse Search
Lincoln 14 10 Browse Search
Jones H. French 13 1 Browse Search
Dorn 11 3 Browse Search
Forrest 10 0 Browse Search
A. S. King 10 0 Browse Search
Gen Banks 10 0 Browse Search
Anderson 9 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 21, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 65 total hits in 37 results.

1 2 3 4
E. J. P. Thompson (search for this): article 7
en and many clergymen, but, independently of the gentlemen whose names we have mentioned, the emancipators may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity,
Bradford, Vt. (Vermont, United States) (search for this): article 7
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
Exeter, N. H. (New Hampshire, United States) (search for this): article 7
ventured upon, it becomes expedient to ask what manner of men the trumpeters may be who have so very fiercely attempted to blast down the walls of Jericho. Let us glance at some of the most conspicuous of the tribunes who, by hook or by crook, were got together under the auspices of the Emancipation Society. The chairman was Mr. William Evans, doubtless a most worthy and estimable member of society, but who, as a politician, orater, or public man, is utterly unknown beyond the confines of Exeter. Hall. Mr. P. A. Taylor, M. P., is a rampant kind of Republican, who very speedily found his level in the Commons House of Parliament. Mr. Thomas Hughes is a crochety clever man, who gained some literary reputation by an amusing boys" book called "Tom Brown's School Days," and lost it by an inconceivably stupid novel called " Tom Brown at Oxford." The Rev. Newman Hall and Baptist Noel are fluent preachers, sufficiently popular in some Dissenting circles. Mr. Edmond Beales is, we believe, a
Galveston (Texas, United States) (search for this): article 7
has not been attained we think is pretty clear, and the other, which is by far the most important, has been equally missed. Whatever may be the merits or faints of Mr. Lincoln's policy, his proclamation has had but one effect, and that is to make the Confederates more fierce and resolute than ever. When the last news left more than a fortnight had elapsed since the proclamation, and no sign of wavering had appeared at the South. The Confederates had opened the new year with a victory at Galveston, and at Vicksburg had inflicted on the Federal a defeat hardly less bloody and quite as important as that of Fredericksburg. Two military disasters and a rise of — gold to 50 premium are the first fruits of the masterly document of the 2d of January and a still more important matter is the widespread anger of all but the Republican zealots. New York has spoken through Mr. Seymour, and now the Governor of Kentucky, a firm Unionist, and a man to whom the North is mainly indebted for keepin
United States (United States) (search for this): article 7
Union and the cause of negro emancipation is in their view, one and the came. And in their eagerness to see it proper they seem in great danger of sinking the distinctions between right and wrong.--This is not the proper position for Englishmen. Our policy is that of strick centrality, and it is inconsistent, with that policy to take violently either one side or the other. England had no desire to see fulfilled what she could not help forecasting — the break up of the Union. Had the United States continued united. Englishmen would not have grudged them their peace, nor any of the prosperity which might have come of it.--Should the disunited States by any happy fortune become reunited, England's attitude towards them would be the same still. It is their affair, not curn. We are glad to see them prosper, and so long as they maintain friendly relations with us they are free to regulate their own affairs as they please. Our attitude is now what it was before the war broke out. Pr
P. A. Taylor (search for this): article 7
ecomes expedient to ask what manner of men the trumpeters may be who have so very fiercely attempted to blast down the walls of Jericho. Let us glance at some of the most conspicuous of the tribunes who, by hook or by crook, were got together under the auspices of the Emancipation Society. The chairman was Mr. William Evans, doubtless a most worthy and estimable member of society, but who, as a politician, orater, or public man, is utterly unknown beyond the confines of Exeter. Hall. Mr. P. A. Taylor, M. P., is a rampant kind of Republican, who very speedily found his level in the Commons House of Parliament. Mr. Thomas Hughes is a crochety clever man, who gained some literary reputation by an amusing boys" book called "Tom Brown's School Days," and lost it by an inconceivably stupid novel called " Tom Brown at Oxford." The Rev. Newman Hall and Baptist Noel are fluent preachers, sufficiently popular in some Dissenting circles. Mr. Edmond Beales is, we believe, a respectable auction
Stanton (search for this): article 7
ravely and endured so much. This absurd confusion of the cause of emancipation with that of re-union has led men usually accounted good into making compromises with most execrable evil. All the worst doings of the Federal Government, its false telegrams, its abominable violations of civil liberty, its recognition and reward of the acts of that infamous wretch Batler, its indifference to the butcheries of M Nell, its avowed hatred of England, the insolence of Seward, and the tyranny of Stanton — all are endured and held up to admiration by dissenting preachers and second- rate litterateurs. who either cannot or will not see that Mr. Lincoln cares no more for the three million slaves in the Southern States, whom his proclamation liberates, than he does for that million and a half in the Border States whom he confirms in their fetters more strongly than ever. Apologists may put it how they will, no one who is not blinded by partisanship can help seeing that that proclamation was n
Seymour (search for this): article 7
and no sign of wavering had appeared at the South. The Confederates had opened the new year with a victory at Galveston, and at Vicksburg had inflicted on the Federal a defeat hardly less bloody and quite as important as that of Fredericksburg. Two military disasters and a rise of — gold to 50 premium are the first fruits of the masterly document of the 2d of January and a still more important matter is the widespread anger of all but the Republican zealots. New York has spoken through Mr. Seymour, and now the Governor of Kentucky, a firm Unionist, and a man to whom the North is mainly indebted for keeping the State from secession, denounces the President and his schemes in a State paper which is certainly one of the most remarkable we have ever read. There are at last sign abroad that the bankruptcy of the North, the desolation of the South, and the ruin of both white man and the negro, will provoke some political reaction in the Federal States. At such a conjuncture it behooves
Seward (search for this): article 7
which they have fought so bravely and endured so much. This absurd confusion of the cause of emancipation with that of re-union has led men usually accounted good into making compromises with most execrable evil. All the worst doings of the Federal Government, its false telegrams, its abominable violations of civil liberty, its recognition and reward of the acts of that infamous wretch Batler, its indifference to the butcheries of M Nell, its avowed hatred of England, the insolence of Seward, and the tyranny of Stanton — all are endured and held up to admiration by dissenting preachers and second- rate litterateurs. who either cannot or will not see that Mr. Lincoln cares no more for the three million slaves in the Southern States, whom his proclamation liberates, than he does for that million and a half in the Border States whom he confirms in their fetters more strongly than ever. Apologists may put it how they will, no one who is not blinded by partisanship can help seeing t
Salwey (search for this): article 7
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
1 2 3 4