hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Grandison 10 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Grant 9 3 Browse Search
Forrest 8 0 Browse Search
Michigan (Michigan, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
John Hanes 6 0 Browse Search
Mary Smith 6 0 Browse Search
C. A. Cuthbert 6 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 6, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 65 total hits in 26 results.

1 2 3
Coles (Illinois, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury. The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections. He said: The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this. He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy. Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake u
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) (search for this): article 9
e for Congress and now a Judge of the Supreme Court of the District. He wished to let the country know that we had a Secretary of War who sent out blank commissions on the eve of election, and allowed partisan candidates to fill them. After this talk not of the purity of elections! This was partisanship of the basest kind, and would be scorned by all patriotic and honest men. He commented upon the President's instructions to Gen. Steele in reference to the qualifications of voters in Arkansas. They were to be permitted to vote under their State Constitution as modified by the President; provided, too, they would support his proclamation!--Mighty man! Oh! what meat is this on which our modern Casar feeds that he has grown so great! He quoted at length from Plutarch's "Life of Pompey," and drew a parallel between Casar and Lincoln. It would be seen that our President was not the first man in the world who had sent soldiers to control elections. He did not know whether the Pre
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury. The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections. He said: The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this. He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy. Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake u
Gulf of Mexico (search for this): article 9
made by the fathers, and under which they still desired to live. Their only disloyalty arose from the fact of their following in the precepts of their fathers. Was he asked to support a new Union under the oath he took? Was he asked to enter the new house built to Butler on the ruins of the old fabric built by Washington, Adams, Jefferson and Madison? His people did not desire to enter the beauteous palace of Archbishop Butler, in spite of the adornments which he picked up in the Gulf of Mexico. They did not desire to look into the costly mirrors, nor to hear the strains of the music from stolen instruments. They preferred the good old strains which came up from the past, which they have heard in infancy and manhood — the music of the Union and the Constitution; and for a declaration of this kind alone have the people of what was once his State, but now a military province, had the tyrannical hand laid upon them for presuming to vote for the representatives of their choice.
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 9
mself in power and have greater opportunity for the purposes of ambition. He said the Senator from Michigan lays down the broad proposition that the military orders concerning elections are law, and therefore the proclamation of the Governor of Maryland was a usurpation of power; yet, strangely, he compliments the man who never was Governor of the State of Delaware by the voice of the people, but who was act over them by the force of the bayonet, because he issued a proclamation for the people to be obsequiously obedient to the orders of their master, General Schenck. If the soil of Maryland had been reddened with blood, as the Senator indicated it might have been, against whom would the dead account stand? Not against Governor Bradford or the citizens; but against him who sat enthroned at the other end of the avenue, and Major General Schenck and those associated with him. In regard to military interference in his own State, he quoted from a volume of three hundred pages of sworn t
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury. The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interferays down the broad proposition that the military orders concerning elections are law, and therefore the proclamation of the Governor of Maryland was a usurpation of power; yet, strangely, he compliments the man who never was Governor of the State of Delaware by the voice of the people, but who was act over them by the force of the bayonet, because he issued a proclamation for the people to be obsequiously obedient to the orders of their master, General Schenck. If the soil of Maryland had been
United States (United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury. The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interfeUnited States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections. He said: The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this. He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy. Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake
Michigan (Michigan, United States) (search for this): article 9
. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections. He said: The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this. He would commend to him he tyrannical hand laid upon them for presuming to vote for the representatives of their choice. Yet the gentleman from Michigan said if these things were true they deserved it; besides they should consider the state of the times. Such a response as to him. Suppose that after the exercise of this power he finds that the army approves of his acts, as the Senator from Michigan does, what is to hinder him from perpetuating his power, after eight years, and thus be coming one of the greatest monarrder to strengthen himself in power and have greater opportunity for the purposes of ambition. He said the Senator from Michigan lays down the broad proposition that the military orders concerning elections are law, and therefore the proclamation of
Salisbury (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury. The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom. The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections. He said: The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this. He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy. Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake
George F. Fisher (search for this): article 9
had commissions signed by Edwin M. Stanton, and sent in blank, accompanied by orders, and yet the Secretary of Wardenies that any orders had been sent direct from his department. He could not show these orders, but the testimony would prove this crime on the Secretary to the satisfaction of a jury of twelve honest men. The blank commissions, it is testified by several of the Provost-Marshals, who are of course Republicans, were filled up on the Sunday preceding the Tuesday election, by George F. Fisher, the Republican candidate for Congress and now a Judge of the Supreme Court of the District. He wished to let the country know that we had a Secretary of War who sent out blank commissions on the eve of election, and allowed partisan candidates to fill them. After this talk not of the purity of elections! This was partisanship of the basest kind, and would be scorned by all patriotic and honest men. He commented upon the President's instructions to Gen. Steele in reference to the
1 2 3