Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition.. You can also browse the collection for South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) or search for South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 47 results in 16 document sections:

1 2
ith his success; and Chap. XLIV.} 1770. March reserved to himself liberty to accede to the repeal on some agreement with the East India Company; Garth to South Carolina Committee, 6 March, 1770. with fatal weakness of purpose, delaying the measure which his good sense and humanity approved. The decision came from the King supported by Beckford and Lord Beauchamp, by Dowdeswell, Conway, Dunning the late Solicitor General, and Sir George Saville, proposed Garth to Committee of South Carolina, 11 April, 1770. W. S. Johnson to Gov. Trnmbull of Connecticut, 14 April, 1770. the repeal of the duty on tea. The King who watched Parliament closely, was iner by the hands of the hangman. Boston tore it into pieces and threw it to the winds. Votes at a full Meeting of the Trade at Faneuil Hall, 24 July, 1770. South Carolina, whose patriots had just raised the statue to Chatham, read it with disdainful anger. But there was no help; Lord North had reasoned so far correctly; the no
70. and he was sure that the unreasonableness of Great Britain would precipitate the epoch of American Independence. South Carolina received his letters, still urging union, directing attention to the Chap. XLVI.} 1770. Dec. necessity, of finding loquence; and even shed tears for the expiring liberty of his country. He was seconded by Gadsden and Mackenzie; but South Carolina could neither continue non-importation alone; nor by itself devise a new system. Its association was dissolved, liken having five thousand and thirty white inhabitants, with five thousand eight hundred and thirtythree blacks, State of South Carolina, by Lieut. Gov. Bull, 30 Nov. 1770. commerce resumed its wonted activity in every thing but tea. Lieut. Gov. ators to submission. President Hazel of North Carolina Council to Hillsborough, 4 July, 1771. The Governors of South Carolina and of Virginia, were requested not to harbor the fugitives. But the Chap. XLVI.} 1771. June. far wilderness offe
tion the right of such negative. Hillsborough to Habersham, 4 Dec. 1771, and 7 August, 1772. The affections of South Carolina were still more 1772. Jan. thoroughly alienated. Its public men were ruled by their sense of honor, and felt a stairrespondence of Lieut. Gov. Bull. The members of the Assembly disdained to take any pay for their attendance. State of South Carolina, 1770. Since March 1771, no legislative Act had been perfected, Statutes at large, IV. 331. because the Govert of Courts of Justice into the interior, the Province, at an expense of five thousand pounds, Ramsey's History of South Carolina, II. 126. bought out the monopoly of Richard Cumberland as Provost by patent for the whole; and had offered to establishman, a Scotchman, and a Welshman were sent over by Hillsborough to take their places. Compare List of Judges in South Carolina Statutes at large, i. 439; Ramsey, i. 214, II. 126. We, none of us, said the planters, can expect the honors of the S
ions from compacts, said the men of Princetown, lessen the connection between the Mother Country and the Colonies. South Carolina, too remote for immediate concert, was engaged in the same cause. They marked their affection for Rawlins Lowndes, oosing a new House; Lord Charles Montagu to the Secretary of State, 21 January, 1773; Charles Garth to Committee of South Carolina, 25 Feb. 1773. thus carrying the subject home to the thoughts of every voter in the Province. This controversy wasut of this measure. T. Gushing to A. Lee, 22 April, 1773. In Massachusetts they gladdened every heart. Virginia and South Carolina by their steady perseverance, inspired the hope, that the fire of Liberty would spread through the Continent. Samuan Nation, and that men will always go to the cheapest market. Charles Garth to the Committee of Correspondence of South Carolina, London, 4 May, 1773. The Ministry was still in its halcyon days; no opposition was made even by the Whigs; and t
er, 1773, incloses the documents Gordon's Hist. of Pennsylvania, 481,482. Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania, II. 368. Within a few days not one remained. South Carolina, by her spirit and perseverance, gave now, as she had ever done, evidence that her patriotism would be the support of Union. The Province was at that time in a state of just excitement at the arbitrary act of its Council in imprisoning Thomas Powell, the Publisher of the South Carolina Gazette, for an alleged contempt. The Council was a body m which the distinguished men of that Province scorned to accept a seat; its members were chiefly the Crown officers; and they held their places Haldimand to Dartmouth, 28 Dec. 1773. all impatient at the winds which had driven its tea-ship off the coast, was resolved on following the example. In South Carolina the ship with two hundred and fifty-seven chests of tea, arrived on the second of December; the spirit of opposition ran very high; but the consignees were pe
ces, il pourra produire un jour dans son pays des effets pareils à ceux qui yont a jamais illustre la carriere politique de Milord Chatham. Written in 1773 by the French Ambassador De Guines. Memoire sur l'angleterre; In the French Archives, Angleterre, Tom. 502. The cause of liberty obtained in him a friend who was independent of party allegiance and traditions, just at the time when the passion for ruling America by the central authority was producing anarchy in the Colonies. In South Carolina, whose sons esteemed themselves disfranchised on their own soil by the appointment of strangers to every office, the Governor had for four years negatived every taxbill in the hope of controlling the appropriations. In North Carolina, the law establishing courts of justice had expired; in the conflict of claims of power between the Governor and the Legislature, every new law on the subject was negatived, and there were no courts of any kind in the Province. Martin to Dartmouth, 25 De
1 2