hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 74 0 Browse Search
G. T. Beauregard 25 1 Browse Search
James D. Johnston 22 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 22 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Thomas J. Armstrong 14 0 Browse Search
Zeno Farrington 13 1 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
France (France) 12 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: August 16, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 21 total hits in 13 results.

1 2
o endure? Should not every man, woman and child of the South regard it as their duty to avenge these atrocities at every opportunity? Who knows the present condition or future fate of that bold, chivalrous Marylander, Thomas? How fares our noble Pegram, and a host of others, bold, self sacrificing and noble spirits? Their future is all shrouded in darkness and uncertainty! Reflect for a moment, if you please, upon these homes rendered hopelessly desolate by the premature end of a Dreux, Bartow, Garnett, Bee, Johnson, and many others. We should look well to it that we keep securely, and under the most rigid discipline, those upon whom we expect to retaliate the base injuries of these men, a part of them new prisoners of the enemy. We must, further, reflect that nothing has ever been gained by leniency to these depraved miscreants. What return has South Carolina received for the courteous treatment lavished with a bounteous hand upon the garrison of Fort Sumter? Nothing but the
d not every man, woman and child of the South regard it as their duty to avenge these atrocities at every opportunity? Who knows the present condition or future fate of that bold, chivalrous Marylander, Thomas? How fares our noble Pegram, and a host of others, bold, self sacrificing and noble spirits? Their future is all shrouded in darkness and uncertainty! Reflect for a moment, if you please, upon these homes rendered hopelessly desolate by the premature end of a Dreux, Bartow, Garnett, Bee, Johnson, and many others. We should look well to it that we keep securely, and under the most rigid discipline, those upon whom we expect to retaliate the base injuries of these men, a part of them new prisoners of the enemy. We must, further, reflect that nothing has ever been gained by leniency to these depraved miscreants. What return has South Carolina received for the courteous treatment lavished with a bounteous hand upon the garrison of Fort Sumter? Nothing but the blackest ingrat
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): article 3
is reported to exist in Richmond, may undergo a very decided change, We are, gentlemen, yours respectfully, Several Ladies. The suggestions of our correspondent accord with what we have often said on the subject. The treatment of Lincoln prisoners ought to be regulated entirely by that which the Confederates in his hands receive. The recent atrocious act of the Federal Congress, giving to every military commandant of a district which he may choose to declare in a state of insurommandant of a district which he may choose to declare in a state of insurrection, the power to put any man accused of treason against Lincoln to death, without judge or jury, renders it more than ever desirable that we should hold in strict confinement all the hostages we possess for his good conduct. Many considerations concur in sustaining the policy of removing the large number of prisoners now in the city, and distributing them among the jails and fortresses of the Confederate States.
1 2