When a man is proud because he can understand and
explain the writings of Chrysippus, say to yourself, If
Chrysippus had not written obscurely, this man would
have had nothing to be proud of. But what is it that I
wish? To understand Nature and to follow it. I inquire
therefore who is the interpreter: and when I have heard
that it is Chrysippus, I come to him (the interpreter).
But I do not understand what is written, and therefore I
seek the interpreter. And so far there is yet nothing to
be proud of. But when I shall have found the interpreter,
the thing that remains is to use the precepts (the lessons).
This itself is the only thing to be proud of. But if I shall
admire the exposition, what else have I been made unless
a grammarian instead of a philosopher? except in one
thing, that I am explaining Chrysippus instead of Homer.
When then any man says to me, Read Chrysippus to me,
I rather blush, when I cannot show my acts like to and
consistent with his words.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
The Discourses of Epictetus, with the Encheridion and Fragments. Epictetus. George Long. translator. London. George Bell and Sons. 1890.
This text was converted to electronic form by optical character recognition and has been proofread to a high level of accuracy.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.