previous next

DEFENSOR CIVITA´TIS

DEFENSOR CIVITA´TIS The oppression of the lower orders of the people by the more powerful, which was prevalent throughout the Roman empire in the fourth century, owing to the general weakness and corruption of local government, led to the institution of a new municipal officer, called defensor civitatis, plebis, loci, in Greek ἔκδικος, whose function it was to defend the rights of the inhabitants of a civitas; the regio or district of a civitas including all the vici within a certain radius as well as the principal town.

An edict of the Emperor Valentinian I. issued in 364 A.D. to Probus, praefectus praetorio, first established this office, but only for the province of Illyricum. By this edict the governor of the province was directed to choose a trustworthy person, not being a curialis, qualified by high official rank or by practice as an advocate, for each city of the dioceses subject to him, in order that the plebs of all Illyricum might be protected by means of public guardians (patroni) from injuries at the hands of the powerful (Cod. Theod. 1.29, 1).

In the next year, 365 A.D., Valentinian extended the office of defensor to all parts of his empire, including Italy, but with some changes in its constitution. Each civitas acquired the right of choosing a defensor from its most eminent and independent citizens, who were bound to serve the office in a prescribed order. Curiales or decuriones, the class from which magistrates were taken, could not hold this office.

The election of a defensor was made by the whole civitas, and not, as in the case of magistrates, by the curia alone, the choice of the township had to be confirmed by the emperor or his deputy, the praefectus praetorio. At first a defensor held office for five years, but the term was reduced by Justinian to two years. The protection of the inhabitants of his district from oppression of all kinds, and especially from that of the imperial governor and local authorities, was always considered to be the main object of a defensor civitatis ( “ut imprimis parentis vicem plebi exhibeas,” Cod. Just. 1.55, 5). Moreover it was his business to prevent the taxes being made too burdensome. For the purpose of prosecuting oppressors, he had free access to the court of the governor, and, if necessary, he could bring his complaints against the governor or other officials before the emperor or ministers of the imperial government. The defensor acted as judge in civil cases of minor importance; his jurisdiction was first limited by Justinian to fifty solidi, and afterwards extended by that emperor to three hundred solidi. He had the right of appointing guardians and of registering many formal proceedings: as, e.g., the declaration of gifts above a certain amount (donatio) and the making of wills. Justinian gave him an exceptor or clerk and executive officials (officiales).

Not being a magistrate, he had originally no power of inflicting any punishment ( “nullas infligant multas, nullas exerceant quaestiones,” Cod. Theod. 1.29, 7), but subsequently a petty jurisdiction was conferred on him. In course of time, as new duties were attached to the office, the position of a defensor came to resemble that of a magistrate; in rank, however, he had precedence of magistrates.

The institution of defensor civitatis failed to effect the object for which it was established and fell into contempt. The Emperor Majorian in 458 A.D., and the Emperor Justinian in 535 A.D., tried to revive its importance by legislation, but unsuccessfully. (Cod. Theod. 1.29 (11); Cod. Just. 1.55; Nov. Majoriani, 3; Nov. Just. 15; Bethmann-Hollweg, Römische Civilprocess, 3.107; Savigny, Geschichte des röm. Rechts, 1.23; Schmid, de Civit. defensore; Desjardins, de Civit. defensore.

[E.A.W]

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: