[
259]
In 1866
Hon. A. M. Keiley, (then of
Petersburg, but for some years past the scholarly and popular
Mayor of
Richmond), published a volume on his prison life at
Point Lookout and
Elmira, which we would be glad to see read by all who really wish to know the truth concerning those prisons.
We make the following extracts concerning
Point Lookout:
The routine of prison-life at Point Lookout was as follows: Between dawn and sunrise a “reveille” horn summoned us into line by companies, ten of which constituted each division — of which I have before spoken — and here the roll was called.
This performance was hurried over with much as haste as is ascribed to certain marital ceremonies in a poem that it would be obviously improper to make a more particular allusion to; and those whose love of a nap predominates over fear of the Yankees, usually tumble in for another snooze.
About eight o'clock the breakfasting began.
This operation consisted in the forming of the companies again into line, and introducing them under lead of their sergeants into the mess-rooms, where a slice of bread and a piece of pork or beef — lean in the former and fat in the latter being contraband of war — were placed at intervals of about twenty inches apart.
The meat was usually about four or five ounces in weight.
These we seized upon, no one being allowed to touch a piece, however, until the whole company entered, and each man was in position opposite his ration (universally pronounced raytion, among our enemies, as it is almost as generally called with the “a” short among ourselves, symbolical, you observe, of the shortness of provant in Dixie). This over, a detail of four or five men from each company — made at morning roll-call — formed themselves into squads for the cleansing of the camp; an operation which the Yankees everywhere attend to with more diligence than ourselves.
The men then busied themselves with the numberless occupations which the fertility of American genius suggests, of which I will have something to say hereafter, until dinner-time, when they were again carried to the mess-houses, where another slice of bread, and rather oven, half-pint of watery slop, by courtesy called “soup,” greeted the eyes of such ostrich-stomached animals as could find comfort in that substitute for nourishment.
About sunset, at the winding of another horn, the roll was again called, to be sure that no one had “flanked out,” and, about an hour after, came “taps;” after which all were required to remain in their quarters and keep silent.
The Sanitary Commission, a benevolent association of exempts in aid of the Hospital Department of the Yankee army, published in July, 1865, a “Narrative of Sufferings of United States Officers and Soldiers, Prisoners of War,” in which a parallel is drawn between
[260]
the treatment of prisoners on both sides, greatly to the disadvantage, of course, of “Dixie.”
An air of truthfulness is given to this production by a number of affidavits of Confederate prisoners, which made many a Confederate stare and laugh to read.
They were generally the statements of “galvanized” rebels, “so called;” that is, prisoners who had applied for permission to take the oath, or of prisoners who had little offices in the various pens, which they would lose on the whisper of any thing disagreeable, and their testimony is entitled to the general credit of depositions taken “under duress.”
But among these documentary statements, in glorification of the humanity of the Great Republic, is one on page 89, from Miss Dix, the grand female dry-nurse of Yankee Doodle (who, by the by, gave, I understand, unpardonable offence to the pulchritude of Yankeedom, by persistently refusing to employ any but ugly women as nurses--the vampire)--which affirms that the prisoners at Point Lookout “were supplied with vegetables, with the best of wheat bread, and fresh and salt meat three times daily in abundant measure.”
Common gallantry forbids the characterization of this remarkable extract in harsher terms than to say that it is untrue in every particular.
It is quite likely that some Yankee official at Point Lookout made this statement to the benevolent itinerant, and her only fault may be in suppressing the fact that she “was informed,” etc., etc. But it is altogether inexcusable in the Sanitary Commission to attempt to palm such a falsehood upon the world, knowing its falsity, as they must have done.
For my part, I never saw any one get enough of any thing to eat at Point Lookout, except the soup, and a teaspoonful of that was too much for ordinary digestion.
These digestive discomforts were greatly enhanced by the villainous character of the water, which is so impregnated with some mineral as to offend every nose, and induce diarrhea in almost every alimentary canal.
It colors every thing black in which it is allowed to rest, and a scum rises on the top of a vessel if it is left standing during the night, which reflects the prismatic colors as distinctly as the surface of a stagnant pool.
Several examinations of this water have been made by chemical analysis, as I was told by a Federal surgeon in the prison, and they have uniformly resulted in its condemnation by scientific men; but the advantages of the position to the Yankees, as a prison pen, so greatly counter-balanced any claim of humanity, that Point Lookout I felt sure would remain a prison camp until the end of the war, especially as there are wells outside of “the Pen,” which are not liable to these charges, the water of which is indeed perfectly pure and wholesome, so that the Yanks suffer no damage therefrom.
The ground was inclosed at Point Lookout for a prison in July, 1863, and the first instalment of prisoners arrived there on the 25th of that
[261]
month from the Old Capitol, Fort Delaware and Fort McHenry, some of the Gettysburg captures.
One hundred and thirty-six arrived on the 31st of the same month from Washington, and on the 10th of August another batch came from Baltimore, having been captured at Falling Waters.
Every few weeks the number was increased, until they began to count by thousands.
During the scorching summer, whose severity during the day is as great on that sand-barren as anywhere in the Union north of the Gulf, and through the hard winter, which is more severe at that point than anywhere in the country south of Boston, these poor fellows were confined here in open tents, on the naked ground, without a plank or a handful of straw between them and the heat or frost of the earth.
And when, in the winter, a high tide and an easterly gale would flood the whole surface of the pen, and freeze as it flooded, the sufferings of the half-clad wretches, many accustomed to the almost vernal warmth of the Gulf, may easily be imagined.
Many died outright, and many more will go to their graves crippled and racked with rheumatisms, which they date from the winter of 1863-4.
Even the well-clad sentinels, although relieved every thirty minutes (instead of every two hours, as is the army rule), perished in some instances, and in others lost their feet and hands, through the terrible cold of that season.
During all this season the ration of wood allowed to each man was an arm-full for five days, and this had to cook for him as well as warm him, for at that time there were no public cook-houses and mess-rooms.
An additional refinement of cruelty was the regulation which always obtained at Point Lookout, and which I believe was peculiar to the prison, under which the Yanks stole from us any bed-clothing we might possess, beyond one blanket! This petty larceny was effected through an instrumentality they called inspections. Once in every ten days an inspection was ordered, when all the prisoners turned out in their respective divisions and companies in marching order. They ranged themselves in long lines between the rows of tents, with their blankets and haversacks — those being the only articles considered orthodox possessions of a rebel.
A Yankee inspected each man, taking away his extra blanket, if he had one, and appropriating any other superfluity he might chance to possess; and this accomplished, he visited the tents and seized every thing therein that under the convenient nomenclature of the Federals was catalogued as “contraband” --blankets, boots, hats, any thing.
The only way to avoid this was by a judicious use of greenbacks — and a trifle would suffice — it being true, with honorable exceptions, of course, that Yankee soldiers are very much like ships: to move them, you must “slush the ways.”
In the matter of clothing, the management at Point Lookout was simply infamous.
You could receive nothing in the way of clothing without giving up the corresponding article which you might
[262]
chance to possess; and so rigid was this regulation, that men who came there barefooted have been compelled to beg or buy a pair of worn-out shoes to carry to the office in lieu of a pair sent them by their friends, before they could receive the latter.
To what end this plundering was committed I could never ascertain, nor was I ever able to hear any better, or indeed any other reason advanced for it, than that the possession of extra clothing would enable the prisoners to bribe their guards!
Heaven help the virtue that a pair of second-hand Confederate breeches could seduce!
As I have mentioned the guards, and as this is a mosaic chapter, I may as well speak here as elsewhere of the method by which order was kept in camp.
During the day, the platform around the pen was constantly paced by sentinels, chiefly of the Invalid (or, as it is now called, the Veteran Reserve) Corps, whose duty it was to see that the prisoners were orderly, and particularly, that no one crossed “the dead-line.”
This is a shallow ditch traced around within the inclosure, about fifteen feet from the fence.
The penalty for stepping over this is death, and although the sentinels are probably instructed to warn any one who may be violating the rule, the order does not seem to be imperative, and the negroes, when on duty, rarely troubled themselves with this superfluous formality.
Their warning was the click of the lock, sometimes the discharge of their muskets.
These were on duty during my stay at the Point every third day, and their insolence and brutality were intolerable.
Besides this detail of day-guard, which of course was preserved during the night, a patrol made the rounds constantly from “taps,” the last horn at night, to “reveille.”
These were usually armed with pistols for greater convenience, and as they are shielded from scrutiny by the darkness, the indignities and cruelties they often-times inflicted on prisoners, who for any cause might be out of their tents between those hours, especially when the patrol were black, were outrageous.
Many of these were of a character which could not by any periphrase be decently expressed — they were, however, precisely the acts which a set of vulgar brutes, suddenly invested with irresponsible authority, might be expected to take delight in; and, as it was of course impossible to recognize the perpetrators, redress was unattainable, even if one could brook the sneer and insult which would inevitably follow complaint.
Indeed, most of the Yankees did not disguise their delight at the insolence of these Congoes.
Under date of Thursday, June 16th, he writes:
Saw to-day, for the first time, the chief provost-marshal, Major H. G. O. Weymouth.
He is a handsome official, with ruddy face, a rather frank countenance, and a cork-leg.
He conducts this establishment on the “laissez faire” principle — in short, he lets it alone severely.
Whatever the abuses or complaints, or reforms, the only way to reach him is by communications through official channels, said channels being usually the authors of the abuses!
[263]
It may be easily computed how many documents of this description would be likely to meet his eye.
Two or three times a week he rides into camp with a sturdy knave behind him, at a respectful distance — makes the run of one or two streets, and is gone, and I presume sits down over a glass of brandy and water, and indites a most satisfactory report of the condition of the “rebs,” for the perusal of his superior officer, or plies some credulous spinster with specious fictions about the comfort, abundance, and general desirableness of Yankee prisons.
The Major bears a bad reputation here, in the matter of money; all of which, I presume, arises from the unreasonableness of the “rebs,” who are not aware that they have no rights which Yankees are bound to respect.
Friday, June 17th.--A salute of thirteen guns heralded this morning the arrival of General Augur, who commands the department of Washington.
About twelve M., the general, with a few other officials, made the tour of camp, performing, in the prevailing perfunctory manner, the official duty of inspection.
Nothing on earth can possibly be more ridiculous and absurd than the great majority of official inspections of all sorts; but this “banged Bannagher.”
General Augur did not speak to a prisoner, enter a tent, peep into a mess-room, or, so far as I saw, take a single step to inform himself how the pen was managed.
Weymouth probably fixed up a satisfactory report, however, when the general's brief exhibition of his new uniform to the appalled “rebs” was over.
Visited all my comrades to-day, and, with one exception, found them all suffering like myself from exhausting diarrhea, induced by the poisonous water.
In his narrative of prison life at
Elmira, after speaking in. high terms of the kindly feeling towards the prisoners shown by
Major Colt, the commandant of the prison,
Mr. Keiley writes as follows:
In the executive duties of his office, Major Colt was assisted by fifteen or twenty officers, and as many non-commissioned officers, chiefly of the militia or the veteran reserves.
Among them were some characters which are worth a paragraph.
There was a long-nosed, long-faced, long-jawed, long-bearded, long-bodied, long-legged, endless-footed, and long-skirted curiosity, yclept Captain Peck, ostensibly engaged in taking charge of certain companies of “rebs,” but really employed in turning a penny by huckstering the various products of prisoners' skill — an occupation very profitable to Peck, but generally unsatisfactory, in a pecuniary way, to the “rebs.”
Many of them have told me of the impossibility of getting their just dues from the prying, round-shouldered captain, who had a snarl and an oath for every one out of whom he was not, at that instant, making money.
Another rarity of the pen was Lieutenant John McC., a braw
[264]
chiel frae the land oa cakes, who was a queer compound of good-nature and brutality.
To some of us he was uniformly polite, but he had his pistol out on any occasion when dealing with the majority of the “Johnnies,” and would fly into a passion over the merest nothing, that would have been exceedingly amusing, but for a wicked habit he had of laying about him with a stick, a tent pole — any thing that fell into his hands.
He was opening a trench one day, through the camp, when, for the crime of stepping across it, he forced a poor, sick boy, who was on his way to the dispensary for medicine, to leap backwards and forwards over it till he fell from exhaustion amid the voluble oaths of the valiant lieutenant.
One Lieutenant R. kept McC. in countenance by following closely his example.
He is a little compound of fice and weasel, and having charge of the cleaning up of the camp, has abundant opportunities to bully and insult, but being, fortunately, very far short of grenadier size, he does not use his boot or fist as freely as his great exemplar.
No one, however, was safe from either of them, who, however accidentally and innocently, fell in their way, physically or metaphorically.
Of the same block Captain Bowden was a chip: a fair-haired, light-moustached, Saxon-faced “Yank” --far the worst type of man, let me tell you, yet discovered — whose whole intercourse with the prisoners was the essence of brutality.
An illustration will paint him more thoroughly than a philippic.
A prisoner named Hale, belonging to the old Stonewall brigade, was discovered one day rather less sober than was allowable to any but the loyal, and Bowden being officer of the guard, arrested him and demanded where he got his liquor.
This he refused to tell, as it would compromise others, and any one but a Yankee would have put him in the guard-house, compelled him to wear a barrel shirt, or inflicted some punishment proportionate to his offence. All this would have been very natural, but not Bowdenish, so this valorous Parolles determined to apply the torture to force a confession!
Hale was accordingly tied up by the thumbs — that is, his thumbs were fastened securely together behind his back, and a rope being attached to the cord uniting them, it was passed over a cross bar over his head and hauled down, until it raised the sufferer so nearly off the ground that the entire weight of his body was sustained by his thumbs, strained in an unnatural position, his toes merely tonching the ground.
The torture of this at the wrists and shoulder joints is exquisite, but Hale persisted in refusing to peach, and called on his fellow-prisoners, many of whom were witnesses of this refined villainy, to remember this when they got home.
Bowden grew exasperated at his victim's fortitude, and determined to gag him. This he essayed to accomplish by fastening a heavy oak tent-pin in his mouth; and when he would not open his mouth sufficiently — not an easy operation — he struck him in the face with the oaken billet, a blow which broke several of his teeth and covered his mouth with blood!
[265]
On the other hand, some of the officers were as humane and merciful as these wretches were brutal and cowardly, and all who were my fellow-prisoners will recall, with grateful remembrance, Captain Benjamin Munger, Lieutenant Dalgleish, Sergeant-Major Rudd, Lieutenant McKee, Lieutenant Haverty, commissary of one of the regiments guarding us, a whole-souled Fenian, formerly in the book-business in New York, and still there probably, and one or two others.
These officers were assigned in the proportion of one to every company at first, but to every three hundred or four hundred men afterwards, and were charged with the duty of superintending roll-calls, inspecting quarters, and seeing that the men under their charge got their rations; and the system was excellent.
During the month of July, four thousand three hundred and twenty-three prisoners were entered on the records of Elmira prison, and by the 29th of August, the date of the last arrivals, nine thousand six hundred and seven.
The barrack accommodations did not suffice for quite half of them, and the remainder were provided with “A” tents, in which they continued to be housed when I left the prison in the middle of the following October, although the weather was piercingly cold.
Thinly clad as they came from a summer's campaign, many of them without blankets, and without even a handful of straw between them and the frozen earth, it will surprise no one that the suffering, even at that early day, was considerable.
As I left, however, the contributions of the Confederate Government, which, despairing of procuring an exchange, was taxing its exhausted energies to aid the prisoners, began to come in.
An agent was in New York selling cotton for the purpose, and many boxes of blankets and coarse clothing were furnished from the proceeds of the sale.
This tender regard was a happy contrast to the barbarity of Washington management, which seemed to feel the utmost indifference to the sufferings of its soldiers, and embarrassed their exchange by every device of delay and every suggestion of stubbornness.
As I have spoken of the military government of Elmira prison, it may not be inappropriate to pursue the statistical view, now that I am in it, by a brief chapter on the Medical and Commissary Departments, before I resume the thread of the more personal portion of my narrative.
The chief of the former department was a club-footed little gentleman, with an abnormal head and a snaky look in his eyes,. named Major E. L. Sanger.
On our arrival in Elmira, another surgeon, remarkable chiefly for his unaffected simplicity and virgin ignorance of everything appertaining to medicine, played doctor there.
But as the prisoners increased in numbers, a more formal and formidable staff was organized, with Sanger at the head.
Sanger was simply a brute, as we found when we learned the
[266]
whole truth about him from his own people. If he had not avoided a court-martial by resigning his position, it is likely that even a military commission would have found it impossible to screen his brutality to the sick, although the fact that the United States hanged no one for the massacre of Indian women and sucking infants during the year 1865, inspires the fear that this systematic * * * * of Confederate prisoners would have been commended for his patriotism.
He was assisted by Dr. Rider, of Rochester, one of the few “copperheads” whom I met in any office, great or small, at the North.
My association was rather more intimate with him than with any one of the others, and I believe him to have been a competent and faithful officer.
Personally, I acknowledge his many kindnesses with gratitude.
The rest of the “meds” were, in truth, a motley crew in the main, most of them being selected from the impossibility, it would seem,.of doing any thing else with them.
I remember one of the worthies, whose miraculous length of leg and neck suggested “crane” to all observers, whose innocence of medicine was quite refreshing.
On being sent for to prescribe for a prisoner, who was said to have bilious fever, he asked the druggist, a “reb,” in the most naive manner, what was the usual treatment for that disease!
Fortunately, during his stay at Elmira, which was not long, there were no drugs in the dispensary, or I shudder to picture the consequences.
This department was constantly undergoing changes, and I suspect that the whole system was intended as part of the education of the young doctors assigned to us, for as soon as they learned to distinguish between quinine and magnesia they were removed to another field of labor.
The whole camp was divided into wards, to which physicians were assigned, among whom were three “rebel” prisoners, Dr. Lynch, of Baltimore, Dr. Martin, of South Carolina, and Dr. Graham, formerly of Stonewall Jackson's staff, and a fellow-townsman of the lamented hero.
These ward physicians treated the simplest cases in their patients' barrack, and transferred the more dangerous ones to the hospitals, of which there were ten or twelve, capable of accommodating about eighty patients each.
Here every arrangement was made that carpenters could make to insure the patients against unnecessary mortality, and, indeed, a system was professed which would have delighted the heart of a Sister of Charity; but, alas!
the practice was quite another thing.
The most scandalous neglect prevailed even in so simple a matter as providing food for the sick, and I do not doubt that many of those who died perished from actual starvation.
One of the Petersburg prisoners having become so sick as to be sent to the hospital, he complained to his friends who visited him that he could get nothing to eat, and was dying in consequence, when they made application for leave to buy him some potatoes and roast them for him. Dr. S. not being consulted, the request was granted, and when, a few hours afterwards, the roasted potatoes
[267]
were brought in, the poor invalids on the neighboring cots crawled from their beds and begged the peelings to satisfy the hunger that was gnawing them.
When complaint was made of this brutality to the sick, there was always a convenient official excuse.
Sometimes the fault would be that a lazy doctor would not make out his provision return in time, in which case his whole ward must go without food, or with an inadequate supply, till the next day. Another time there would be a difficulty between the chief surgeon and the commissary, whose general relations were of the stripe characterized by S. P. Andrews as “cat-and-dogamy,” which would result in the latter refusing to furnish the former with bread for the sick!
In almost all cases the “spiritus frumenti” failed to get to the patients, or in so small a quantity after the various tolls that it would not quicken the circulation of a canary.
But the great fault, next to the scant supply of nourishment, was the inexcusable deficiency of medicine.
During several weeks, in which dysentery and inflammation of the bowels were the prevalent diseases in prison, there was not a grain of any preparation of opium in the dispensary, and many a poor fellow died for the want of a common medicine, which no family is ordinarily without — that is, if men ever die for want of drugs.
There would be and is much excuse .for such deficiencies in the South--and this is a matter which the Yankees studiously ignore — inasmuch as the blockade renders it impossible to procure any luxuries even for our own sick, and curtails and renders enormously expensive the supply of drugs of the simplest kind, providing they are exotics; but in a nation whose boast it is that they do not feel the war, with the world open to them and supplies of all sorts wonderfully abundant, it is simply infamous to starve the sick as they did there, and equally discreditable to deny them medicines — indispensable according to Esculapian traditions.
The result of the ignorance of the doctors, and the sparseness of these supplies, was soon apparent in the shocking mortality of this camp, notwithstanding the healthfulness claimed for the situation.
This exceeded even the reported mortality at Andersonville, great as that was, and disgraceful as it was to our government, if it resulted from causes which were within its control.
I know the reader, if a Northern man, will deny this, and point to the record of the Wirz trial.
I object to the testimony.
There never was, in all time, such a mass of lies as that evidence, for the most part, could have been proved to be if it had been possible to sift the testimony or examine, before a jury, the witnesses.
I take, as the basis of my comparison, the published report made by four returned Andersonville prisoners, who were allowed to come North on their representation that they could induce their humane Government to assent to an exchange.
Vana spes. Edwin M. Stanton would have seen the whole of them die before he would give General Lee one able-bodied soldier.
[268]
These prisoners alleged (I quote from memory). that out of a population of about thirty-six thousand at that pen, six thousand, or one-sixth of the whole, died between the first of February and the first of August, 1864.
Now at Elmira the quota was not made up till the last of August, so that September was the first month during which any fair estimate of the mortality of the camp could be made.
Now, out of less than nine thousand five hundred prisoners on the first of September, three hundred and eighty-six died that month.
At Andersonville the mortality averaged a thousand a month out of thirty-six thousand, or one thirty-sixth. At Elmira it was three hundred and eighty-six, out of nine thousand five hundred, or one twenty-fifth of the whole. At Elmira it was four per cent.; at Andersonville, less than three per cent. If the mortality at Andersonville had been as great as at Elmira, the deaths should have been one thousand four hundred and forty per month, or fifty per cent. more than they were.
I speak by the card respecting these matters, having kept the morning return of deaths for the last month and a half of my life in Elmira, and transferred the figures to my diary, which lies before me; and this, be it remembered, in a country where food was cheap and abundant; where all the appliances of the remedial art were to be had on mere requisition; where there was no military necessity requiring the government to sacrifice almost every consideration to the inaccessibility of the prison, and the securing of the prisoners, and where Nature had furnished every possible requisite for salubrity.
And now that I am speaking of the death-record, I will jot down two rather singular facts in connection therewith.
The first was the unusual mortality among the prisoners from North Carolina.
In my diary I find several entries like the following :
Monday, October 3d.--Deaths yesterday, 16, of whom 11 N. C.
Tuesday, October 4th.--Deaths yesterday, 14, of whom 7 N. C.
Now, the proportion of North Carolinians was nothing, even approximating what might have been expected from this record.
I commit the fact to Mr. Gradgrind.
Can it be explained by the great attachment the people of that State have for their homes?
The second was the absolute absence of any death from intermittent fever or any analogous disease.
Now I knew well that many of the sick died from this and kindred diseases produced by the miasma of the stagnant lake in our camp; but the reports, which I consolidated every morning, contained no reference to them.
I inquired at the dispensary, where the reports were first handed in, the cause of this anomaly, and learned that Dr. Sanger would sign no report which ascribed to any of these diseases the death of the patient! I concluded that he must have committed himself to the harmlessness of the lagoon in question,
[269]
and determined to preserve his consistency at the expense of our lives — very much after the fashion of that illustrious ornament of the profession, Dr. Sangrado, who continued his warm water arid phlebotomy merely because he had written a book in praise of that practice, although “in six weeks he made more widows and orphans than the siege of Troy.”
I could hardly help visiting on Dr. Sanger the reproaches his predecessor received at the hands of the persecuted people of. Valladolid, who “were sometimes very brutal in their grief,” and called the doctor and Gil Blas no more euphonious name than “ignorant assassins.”
Any post in the medical, department in a Yankee prison-camp is quite valuable on account of the opportunities of plunder it affords, and many of the virtuous “meds” made extensive use of their advantages.
Vast quantities of quinine were prescribed that were never taken, the price (eight dollars an ounce) tempting the cupidity of the physicians beyond all resistance; but the grand speculation was in whiskey, which was supplied to the dispensary in large quantities, and could be obtained for a consideration in any reasonable amount from a “steward” who pervaded that establishment.
I ought not to dismiss this portion of my description of matters medical without adding that the better class of officers in the pen were loud and indignant in their reproaches of Sanger's systematic inhumanity to the sick, and that they affirmed that he avowed his determination to stint these poor helpless creatures in retaliation for alleged neglect on the part of our authorities!
And when at last, on the 21st of September, I carried my report up to the major's tent, with the ghastly record of twenty-nine deaths yesterday, the storm gathered, which in a few weeks drove him from the pen, but which never would have had that effect if he had not, by his rudeness, attained the ill — will of nearly every officer about the pen whose good — will was worth having.
I ascend from pills to provender.
The commissary department was under the charge of a cute, active ex-bank officer, Captain G. C. Whiton.
The ration of bread was usually a full pound per diem, forty-five barrels of flour being converted daily into loaves in the bake-shop on the premises.
The meat-ration, on the other hand, was invariably scanty; and I learned, on inquiry, that the fresh beef sent to the prison usually fell short from one thousand to twelve hundred pounds in each consignment.
Of course when this happened many had to lose a large portion of their allowance; and sometimes it happened that the same man got bones only for several successive days.
The expedients resorted to by the men to supply this want of animal food were disgusting.
Many found an acceptable substitute in rats, with which the place abounded; and these Chinese delicacies commanded an average price of about four cents apiece — in greenbacks.
I have seen scores of them in various states of preparation, and have been assured by those who indulged in them that worse things have been eaten — an estimate of their value that I took on trust.
[270]
Others found in the barrels of refuse fat, which were accumulated at the cook-house, and in the pickings of the bones, which were cut out of the meat and thrown out in a dirty heap back of the kitchen, to be removed once a week, the means of satisfying the craving for meat, which rations would not satisfy.
I have seen a mob of hungry “rebs” besiege the bone-cart, and beg from the driver fragments on which an August sun had been burning for several days, until the impenetrable nose of a Congo.
could hardly have endured them.
Twice a day the camp poured its thousands into the mess-rooms, where each man's ration was assigned him; and twice a day the aforesaid rations were characterized by disappointed “rebs” in language not to be found in a prayer-book.
Those whose appetite was stronger than their apprehensions frequently contrived to supply their wants by “flanking” --a performance which consisted in joining two or more companies as they successively went to the mess-rooms, or in quietly sweeping up a ration as the company filed down the table.
As every ration so flanked was, however, obtained at the expense of some helpless fellow-prisoner, who must lose that meal, the practice was almost universally frowned upon; and the criminal, when discovered, as was frequently the case, was subjected to instant punishment.
This was either confinement in the guard-house, solitary confinement on bread and water, the “sweat-box” or the barrel-shirt.
The war has made all these terms familiar, except the third, perhaps; by it I mean a wooden box, about seven feet high, twenty inches wide and twelve deep, which was placed on end in front of the major's tent.
Few could stand in this without elevating the shoulders considerably; and when the door was fastened all motion was out of the question.
The prisoner had to stand with his limbs rigid and immovable until the jailer opened the door, and it was far the most dreaded of the peines fortes et dures of the pen. In midsummer, I can fancy that a couple of hours in such a coffin would inspire Tartuffe himself with virtuous thoughts, especially if his avoirdupois was at all respectable.
Rev. Dr. I. W. K. Handy, of the Presbyterian Church of
Virginia, who was arrested on an utterly frivilous charge and made a prisoner at
Fort Delaware, and whose evangelical labors among the prisoners were so greatly blessed, has published a volume of 670 pages, entitled “
United States Bonds,” in which he gives a vivid account of the indignities, cruelties and sufferings to which the prisoners there were subjected.
We regret that we have only space for a brief extract.
Under date of November the 6th, 1863,
Dr. Handy thus writes in his diary:
A letter is found in the Philadelphia Inquirer of to-day, giving a terrible account of the sufferings of the Yankee prisoners at Richmond.
[271]
The statement is, palpably, exaggerated and highly colored, and bears the impress of prejudice and great effort for effect.
Almost every illustration adduced in the article will apply to Fort Delaware, and to these may be added instances of individual cruelty and oppression, which would put to shame the unscrupulous statements of this writer, who claims to have been a Federal chaplain.
It has not been uncommon here for our half-clothed, half-fed Confederates at the barracks to be ordered about in the coarsest and roughest manner by their inferiors, and to be knocked on the head with sticks, or to be stuck with bayonets, for the slightest offences; and, sometimes (for no crime whatever), men have been shot at or cruelly murdered by sentinels, who bore malice, and justified themselves upon the plea that they were trying to prevent escapes.
Sick men have been.
kept at the barracks until perfectly emaciated from diarrhea, without the necessary sick vessels, and have been obliged to stagger, through the quarters, to the out-house on the bank of the river, with filth streaming upon their legs; and then, unable to help themselves, they have fallen upon the pathway, and have been found dead in the morning — victims of cruel neglect.
Barefooted, bareheaded and ragged men, tottering with disease, have been left to suffer long for the necessary clothing or medicines, which might have been abundantly supplied; men scarcely convalescent have been made to walk from one end of the Island to the other in changing hospitals, thus bringing on a relapse in almost every case, and have died in a few days thereafter.
Physicians, in contract service, have gone daily into the hospitals, saturated with liquor, and without looking at the tongue or feeling the pulse, have tantalized the poor sufferers with the prescription, “Oh, you must eat!
You must eat!”
and without either furnishing them with medicine or meat, have left them to die. Sick men, on entering the hospitals, have been denuded of their clothing, and when getting a little better, have been forced to walk over damp floors in their stocking-feet and drawers to the water closet, at a remote end of the building — thus exposing themselves to cold and the danger of a relapse.
Men have been dismissed from the hospitals to go to Point Lookout without hat, shoes or blanket; hundreds have been exposed to the danger of contracting the small-pox from coffins filled with loath — some bodies, left for hours together on the wharf, whilst prisoners have been embarking for exchange; the dispensary has remained not only for days, but for weeks together, without some of the most important and common medicines; prisoners have been “bucked and gagged” for the most trivial offences; and the very dead have been robbed of their last shirts, placed in rough coffins, perfectly naked, and then hurried into shallow, unmarked graves.
Much of all this cruelty and inhumanity may not have been designed by those highest in authority, and had they known it, might not have received their sanction, but it has occurred under their administration, and they are, to a greater or less extent, accountable for it all. Were full details given in relation to these matters, they
[272]
would be astounding and perhaps incredible.
In this place they are referred to with no disposition to exaggerate, nor to prejudice.
Some of them could not, perhaps, have been well avoided, but are recorded simply as an offset to the “Chaplain's” details.
The murder of
Colonel E. P. Jones by a sentinel is thus described by
Dr. Hardy in his diary, under date of July 3d, 1864:
A lamentable affair occured at “the rear,” about dusk, this evening.
Many persons are now suffering with diarrhea, and crowds are frequenting that neighborhood.
The orders are to go by one path and return by the other.
Two lines of men, going and coming, are in continual movement.
I was returning from the frequented spot and, in much weakness, making my way back, when, suddenly, I heard the sentinel challenge from the top of the waterhouse.
I had no idea he was speaking to me, until some friends called my attention to the order.
I suppose my pace was too slow for him. I passed on; and as frequent inquiries were made in regard to my health, I was obliged to say to friends, “we have no time to talk; the sentinel is evidently restless or alarmed, and we are in danger.”
I had scarcely.
reached my quarters, before a musket fired; and it was, immediately, reported that Colonel E. P. Jones had been shot.
The murder of Colonel Jones is the meanest, and most inexcusable affair that has occurred in the officers' quarters; or that has come under my own observation since my imprisonment at Fort Delaware.
I did not see him fall; but have learned from Captain J. B. Cole, who was an eye-witness to the whole scene, that although he was standing within ten steps of the man that killed him, he heard no challenge, nor any order to move on. The first intimation he had of the sentinel's displeasure was the discharge of the musket, and the simultaneous exclamation of the Colonel--“Oh, God!
Oh, God!
My God, what did you shoot me for?
Why didn't you tell me to go on?
I never heard you say anything to me!” --and with a few such exclamations, he sank upon the ground; and then fell, or rather rolled, down the embankment.
Colonel Jones has been in the barracks so short a time, that I have not had the pleasure of making his acquaintance.
I have only learned that he is an intelligent physician, of considerable property and influence, and that he is from Middlesex county, Virginia.
Since he came to Fort Delaware, he has been, constantly, suffering with some affection of the feet, causing lameness.
At the time he was shot, he was hobbling along, with one shoe, and was carefully stepping down a rough place, near the water-house, buttoning his pants.
He could not have been more than twenty steps from the point of the musket.
It is said that the murderer seemed, all day, to be seeking an opportunity to shoot some one.
It is also reported that Captain Ahl was seen on the top of the shanty, giving some orders, only a few moments before
[273]
the catastrophe.
These are all the facts that I can learn, concerning this melancholy affair, except that Colonel Jones has been taken to the hospital, and that there is no prospect of his recovery.
Friday, 8th.--The boy who shot Colonel Jones is again on guard, this morning; and it is reported that he has been promoted to a corporalcy.
He belongs, I think, to an Ohio regiment, is about eighteen years old, and is known as “Bill Douglas.”
Unusual watchfulness prevailed during the night.
New sentinels were on guard, in every direction.
A noisy fellow tramped under my window until daylight.
Guards have been posted inside of “the pen,” and everything indicates apprehension, on the part of the Yankees, and danger to the prisoners.
General Schoepf visited “the pen,” accompanied by Captain Ahl, and other officers.
They were evidently excited, and moved quickly from place to place.
Some of the officers were anxious to have an interview, and pressed upon them for a word.
I succeeded in halting the General, and spoke to him myself, about the recklessness of the sentinels, and the great danger to which I was personally exposed just before the shooting last night.
He referred to the repeated attempts which had, lately, been made to effect escape; spoke decidedly of his purpose to put a stop to the whole thing; and excused the guards.
“They shoot down any man,” said he, “who tries to get away.”
Captain Ahl averred that Colonel Jones had been challenged; and justified the sentinel.
Several bystanders insisted, that he was quietly returning from “the rear,” and that there was no cause for the murder.
Ahl affirmed that he was near by when the shooting took place, and that he had ordered the sentinel to fire at the first man that stopped on the thoroughfare.
I appealed to General Schoepf, to hear a statement of the case; and told him that I had always supposed him to be a humane officer, and disposed to do what was right.
He was evidently embarrassed by the presence of Ahl; and nervously moved off towards the gate, followed by his attendants.
He was there surrounded by another company of prisoners, who tried to get an audience.
He refused to hear them; and referred them to “Dr. Handy,” urging as he went out--“He knows I want to do right.”
Colonel Jones lingered a few hours, and died in great agony.
Dr. Handy has kindly placed in our hands his private letter-book containing a large number of statements of prison experience by his fellow-prisoners.
We can only extract one of these.
On the morning of the 30th of August our quiet village was thrown into excitement by a report of the approach of Yankees.
From the fact that private citizens had recently been arrested and carried from their homes by raiding parties, nearly every male inhabitant of the village felt it to be unsafe to remain at home;
[
274]
and I have reason to believe that I was the only man left in town upon their arrival.
I relied upon my sacred calling for security from molestation, and as usual awaited in my own house their coming.
Shortly after their arrival, I observed a man coming around my house to the
back door, as though ashamed to approach by the front entrance, and according to my usual custom, I advanced to meet him and learn his business, when the following conversation ensued:
Yankee. Are you the man of this house?
Answer. I am.
Yankee. What's yer name?
Answer. My name is
Harris; what is yours?
Yankee. My name?
Why my name is------.
Then looking around, he espied some of the servants in the kitchen, a detached building, and awkwardly moved off to see them.
I returned to my seat at my secretary and resumed my occupation of reading.
In a few minutes he returned, and leaning against the lintel of the door, said: “Guess you can go with me.”
“Go with you,” said I; “Where shall I go with you?”
“Up to headquarters.”
I arose, took my cane, and walked about a quarter of a mile to the main body of the command.
The first officer with whom I met was a brainless, conceited
Lieutenant, whose name I never learned.
He, without any kind of salutation, accosted me in a manner meant to be extremely scornful, and asked why I had not sent
Mosby word they were coming and wanted to meet him. I said to him, “Sir, if you really wished to see
Mosby, and desired me to notify him of your coming, why did you not inform me of the fact in time?”
“Do you think he would have come?”
he queried.
“It is extremely probable he would,” I replied.
He ordered me then to be conducted to the
Major.
I was taken up to his quarters, and there learned that the Eighth Illinois Cavalry, commanded by
Major Waite, a little dapper newspaper correspondent formerly, as I have learned, were my captors.
I demanded of this man the cause of my arrest.
He replied that he was carrying out his instructions.
I asked if I might know what those instructions were.
He said, to arrest all men between seventeen and fifty.
I reminded him that I was a minister of the gospel, and not subject to military duty.
He replied, that if upon my arrival in
Washington that fact should appear, I would be released.
He ordered me to be taken to
a Captain Townsend, who had charge of the prisoners.
I declared my purpose to return home for a change of underclothing before I would consent to go, and he might use his pleasure either to take my pledge to return, or to send a man with me as a guard.
Yankee-like, he preferred the latter alternative as, having no such regard for his own word as to prefer faithfulness to a pledge to life itself, he could not believe it to be a trait in the character of any other.
I was obliged to make my few preparations in the most hurried manner, and having commended my family to God, I proceeded
[
275]
to report myself to my captors again.
I found on my return that a large number of citizens had been picked up, among the rest,
General Asa Rogers, a gentleman over sixty years of age, and
Rev. O. A. Kinsolving, of the Episcopal church.
We were moved off, I suppose, about 2 P. M., and proceeded to
Aldie, about thirteen miles. Here we halted, and immediately the men scattered to plunder, and every hen-roost in the village was despoiled in a few minutes.
Women and children were running through the streets, some screaming, all looking for officers to protect them.
Of the nature and extent of their depredations we could only judge by the declarations of such as passed us; all were crying that they were being robbed of everything they had. After remaining here long enough to sack the village completely, they hurried us on to Mt. Zion Meeting House, five miles below
Aldie, where we bivouacked on the ground, without blankets, and only a few hard crackers — all any of us had had since morning — for supper.
The following morning they issued to us more of the “hard-tack,” as they termed it, and some salt pork, which we broiled by sticking it upon the ends of twigs and holding in the blaze of the fire.
As soon as breakfast was over we were once more on the road, and at a most rapid pace.
Proceeding nearly to Drainesville, the rear of the column was fired upon, when our gallant
Major, dreading an ambuscade, tacked nearly right about, and at an increased speed proceeded nearly to Fairfax Courthouse, and then turning again toward the
Potomac, carried us on to
Falls Church, halting only about an hour in a very strong position to feed their horses.
Thus these gallant fellows who, about 700 strong, had started out, as they said, expressly to catch
Mosby, succeeded in capturing thirty-two
citizens, in stealing some twenty-five horses, robbing private citizens along the whole line of their march of all kinds of supplies, and through fear of an attack made, on their return, a march of not less than forty-five or fifty miles in one day. On the morning of September 1st,
Major Waite took occasion to insult us by his profane language and vain boasting of what he had done and was yet to do. His pickets being fired on, however, the camp was thrown into the utmost commotion, and we were hurried off again toward
Washington.
Owing to various delays, we were not brought to
Washington until afternoon.
Near the city we were turned over to
Captain Berry and
Lieutenant Trask, who treated us with the utmost politeness, and seemed desirous to do all in their power to oblige us and render us comfortable.
On arriving in the city we were remanded to the
Old Capitol Prison, and paraded through the streets to show to the good and loyal citizens of the capital of “the greatest nation on earth,” that the “good work was going bravely on.”
At the Old Capitol our fare was horrible for several days; the meat given us was putrid, and few of us could eat our bread with the meat before us. A change for the better, however, took place pretty soon after we had an interview with the superintendent, and the fare became
[
276]
pretty palatable.
We were shown many indulgencies, too, until it was ascertained that the most of us would not even take a parole such as they were administering to many citizen prisoners; when suddenly we were informed that we were to be sent off to
Fort Delaware, to be subjected at that abode of horrors to severe treatment, in retaliation for treatment of a similar character alleged to have been extended.to citizens of the
North in Southern prisons.
And here we are, exposed in a degree that threatens seriously our health, if not the lives of some of our party.
But “hitherto hath the
Lord helped us,” and in Him is our trust; we will not fear what man can do unto us.
Mr. Harris, one the most devoted and useful ministers in
Virginia, contracted disease at
Fort Delaware, from which he was a great sufferer until, a few years after the war, death came to “set the prisoner free.”
The following deposition of
Mr. T. D. Henry was originally written at
Oak Grove, Kentucky, in 1866, and was sent to us a few weeks ago:
Seeing that the Congress of the United States has appointed a committee to investigate the treatment of Federal prisoners in Southern prisons, I have determined, in my feeble manner, to give an account of what I saw and know to be true, as happening in Federal prisons.
I was captured with
General Morgan at Salenville, Ohio, July 26th, 1863.
After capture was carried to Camp Chase, Ohio, where I remained about one month.
I was then, together with all the prisoners at that place, carried to
Camp Douglas,
Illinois.
Prison life from September 1863, until the 12th of April 1864, was comparatively such as a man who, according to the fates of war, had been captured might expect, especially when a captive of a boasted Christian nation.
Rations were of very good quality and quantity, the only thing unpleasant was the various and severe punishments which the commandant of the camp (
Colonel C. V. Deland) saw fit to inflict.
If you bribed one of his guards or escaped by any other means, and was afterwards recaptured and brought back, he would have you tied up by the thumbs just so as the toe would reach the ground.
I have known men punished thus, until they would grow so deathly sick that they would vomit all over themselves, their heads fall forward and almost every sign of life become extinct; the ends of their thumbs would burst open; a surgeon standing by would feel their pulse and say he thought they could stand it a little longer.
Sometimes he would say they had better be cut down.
If this failed to cause them to tell who assisted them in escaping, they were then thrown into an iron-clad dungeon ten by ten square, with a single window ten inches by ten.
Think of a man staying in this place forty or fifty days, when it was as full as it could be, their only privy being a little hole in the floor,
[
277]
from which all the odor arose in the room.
When this failed a sixty-four pound ball and chain was placed upon their leg, with chain so short as to compel its wearer to carry the ball in their hand, or get some one to pull it in a little wagon while they walked at the side, the chain about twenty-eight inches in length.
Some of the balls were worn more than six months. A great many escaped by tunneling.
On one occasion a tunnel was discovered under the barrack occupied by (
Cluke's regiment) the eighth Kentucky cavalry.
Without trying to find out who dug the tunnel, the whole regiment was formed in column of eight deep, and a guard placed around them with instructions to shoot the first man who sat down; this was just after sun up; at two o'clock a man who had just returned the day before from the small-pox hospital, unable to stand longer fell; a guard saw him and fired; one man was killed dead, two others were wounded, one of them losing an arm, as it was afterwards cut off. This same fellow, who did the shooting, was promoted to a corporal's position, whether for this act or not, it is impossible to say, for he affirmed that he would not take $100 for his gun, as that was the eleventh prisoner he had shot with it. This shooting was carried to such an extent that if a man in going from his barrack to the privy should stop at night he was shot at. If more than five were seen together in the day, or if two at night, the same thing occurred.
If any one was heard to whisper at night, or the least ray of light was seen, the guard would fire into the barracks at once.
In each barrack there was only two stoves to two hundred men, and for a stove to warm one hundred men, it was frequently red hot. When taps were sounded (
i. e. “lights out” ) the fire in the stoves could not be put out immediately.
The boys were afraid to go to the stove, for some one was nightly killed in the attempt to extinguish the light.
A ball fired from a gun which would ordinarily shoot a thousand yards, would, when fired at a close object, go through three or four barracks, sometimes flattening itself against the barrack, more often burying itself in the vitals of some sleeper, who little thought that that was to be his last sleep on this earth.
On one occasion as the flag which floated in front of the commandant's quarters was being hoisted the rope broke, letting the flag fall, which being seen by the regiment to which I belonged (second Kentucky cavalry), a terrific yell was given.
This so incensed the
Yankees that a certain valiant
Captain, Gaffeny by name, marched his company, some eighty strong, up to our barracks; had the regiment formed and went up and down the line kicking the men, and swearing that his company, about eighty strong, could whip the whole camp of about five thousand.
About this time
Colonel Deland was ordered to the front.
He was succeeded by
Colonel B. J. Sweet as commandant of camp,
Colonel Skinner as commissary of prisoners, and a fiend named
Captain Webb Sponable as inspector of prisoners.
From this time forward the darkest leaf in the legends of all tyranny could not possibly contain a greater number of punishments.
[
278]
Our whole camp was rearranged; the parapet guard were ordered not to fire unless some one tried to escape; a police guard was placed in the prison to do all the devilment which the infernally fertile mind of
Captain Sponable could invent; starvation was carried on quite systematically.
Our rations for breakfast consisted of five ounces of bread and six ounces of fresh beef.
As the rations for two hundred men were boiled in a sixty-gallon kettle, it was necessary in order to cook it done, to boil it to shreds.
In fact there was no more nutritious matter in it than in an old dish cloth, for dinner one pint bean soup and five ounces of bread,
this was our living. This was not regularly issued, for the slightest offence would cause the captain's direful anger to be aroused.
and as he would make most by stopping our rations this was quite a favorite punishment.
His mildest punishment was to get a scantling two inches wide, shave it down until it was only half inch thick on top and put legs about seventeen feet long to it. (This horse, when finished, was called
Morgan). Now, for the slight offence of looking at a guard the boys have been placed on this horse for hours, their feet hanging down.
Sometimes the Yanks would laugh and say, I will give you a pair of spurs, which was a bucket of sand tied to each foot; also to set the boys astraddle the roof of a dog house.
I have seen men who had been left in this condition until the skin and flesh was cut nearly to the bone.
Men in the winter would get so cold that they would fall off. When warmed they were put back.
Another slight punishment was to saw a barrel in two, cut a hole in one end so as to allow a man's head to go through, but leave the barrel around his shoulders, then march him in the sun until the rays reflected from the barrel would swell his head almost twice its natural size.
I have seen men's faces peel all over from this innocent amusement of the guards.
If the least sign of water or spit was seen on the floor the order was, “Come, go to the horse or point for grub,” which was to stand with the legs perfectly straight, reach over, and touch the ground with the fingers.
If the legs were bent in the least, a guard was present with a paddle, which he well knew how to use. When the guards grew weary of this punishment, another was to make the men pull down their pants and sit, with nothing under them, on the snow and frozen ground.
I have known men to be kept sitting until you could see their prints for some days afterwards in the snow and ice. When they got weary of this, they commenced whipping, making the men lay on a barrel, and using their belts, which had a leaden clasp with sharp edge, the belt would often gather wind so as to turn the clasp edgeways; every lick inflicted thus cut entirely through the skin.
If more than five men were seen together, or if anyone was heard to whisper or spit upon the floor, it was certain to be followed by one of these punishments.
Frequently men sick in barracks were delirious; sometimes one or two in a barrack were crazy.
These
[
279]
were the cause of a whole barrack of men being mounted on a horse or punished in other ways.
Sometimes a guard would come in, and swear he heard some one whispering.
He would make four or five men get up, with nothing but their underclothes to protect them against a climate where the thermometer stood twenty degrees below zero.
Shooting about this time was less frequent.
The fiends were satisfied with such punishment as would most likely end in death.
At this period we were reinforced by the prisoners captured in front of
Nashville.
They, after being cooped up in the cars four or five days, were nearly dead for water.
The hydrants were frozen up, and we had eaten all the snow inside the prison.
The poor fellows would lay down at or as close to the dead-line as possible, and reach their arm through and pull the snow to them.
I saw one of the guards standing twenty-five steps from a prisoner thus engaged shoot at him three times.
Fortunately the police guards were armed with pistols; had it been a rifle the poor fellow must have died the first shot.
Think of a man's mind being racked by all of these punishments, for the innocent suffered as well as the guilty, and as frequently, when no one was to blame, were all punished; and it is almost a miracle that anyone should have remained there twenty months without losing his reason.
Sworn to before me this third day of March, 1876.
The following statement of
Major Robert Stiles of
Richmond Virginia, will be received by his large circle of friends and acquaintances as the testimony of a gentleman “without fear and without reproach.”
I was a prisoner of war at
Johnson's Island and Fort Lafayette from April to October, 1865, having been captured at Sailor's creek.
During this time I did not suffer seriously to my own person from bad treatment, but saw and heard no little of the suffering of others.
The Southern field officers were released from
Johnson's Island in May or June, but I was held a prisoner because I declined to take the somewhat remarkable oath propounded to us, and refused to give in addition my word of honor that I would say nothing against the
Government of the
United States.
At
Johnson's Island all the formidable nomenclature and enginery of prison discipline were in vogue.
We had our “
dead line” within and up some distance from the tall fence which formed “the pen,”
[
280]
which line, if a prisoner crossed, the guard, posted on a plank walk near the top of the fence, was under orders to fire upon him. We had our “
lights out” --after which, if, for any cause, a lamp or fire was lit, the guard had orders to fire upon the offending light.
These orders were sometimes executed with fatal result; and it was currently reported that at least one man of the guard had been promoted to a sergeantcy, for killing a wretched prisoner who, unable to endure the frightful cold, had risen to kindle a fire.
We had our “
black-hole” in which “refractory” prisoners were punished, solitary, dark, damp and cramped.
At this, as at all other Federal prisons,
the rations of prisoners were at sundry times reduced below the amount confessedly indispensable to the maintenance of a man in full health — in retaliation as was alleged for the starvation of Federal prisoners in Confederate prisons.
During my stay on the
Island, the war being substantially over, the
discipline and management were more liberal, and the ration, though meagre, larger than it had been; the sutler, too, was open, and the few prisoners fortunate enough to obtain money lived reasonally well, but the majority still suffered from lack of food.
After being an inmate of the pen for a few days and observing the really pitiful hunger and destitution, I organized a system of collection from the messes who had money, and patronized the sutler and distribution among the less favored who starved on the prison ration.
I fed from a hundred to a hundred and fifty men every day, and this moment can well recall the scene at the daily distribution.
I would form them in line, count them off in squads or messes of ten, appointing an orderly for each mess, and then separating my provisions, consisting of scraps more or less fragmentary, into as many piles as there were orderlies, deliver one pile to each orderly for distribution among his mess.
After this was done the poor fellows would break ranks and scuffle on the bare ground under the table for the crumbs.
These men were all officers of the Confederate armies--most of them field officers.
The
clothing issued to our prisoners was quite as scanty as the rations, the
post surgeon's certificate, that it was absolutely necessary in each individual case, being required to entitle a man to an overcoat — and that for Southern men exiled on a bleak island swept by chill tempests, with the thermometer frequently more than twenty degrees below zero.
In order to get one of these certificates, a man was required to stand in line in the open air scantily clad, waiting his time to enter the surgeon's office and submit to an examination to test the condition of his lungs, &c. It can readily be imagined how many were saved from pneumonia and consumption by this humane distribution of overcoats.
It is well known that the supply of blankets was totally inadequate until the offer of our Goverment to trade cotton for clothing for our prisoners was accepted.
Of course I did not personally suffer from exposure to cold, being on the
Island only during the
spring and
summer months, but I not only heard of these scenes and regulations from many men
[
281]
who had wintered on this desert isle, but just before my release, I talked with a gentleman who had resigned or been removed from the place of post surgeon because of his repeated but fruitless protests that it was impossible to maintain men in health while half fed and half clad, and who in particular had attempted to evade the barbarous regulation about overcoats, by giving out certificates, as rapidly as he could write or sign them, that the bearer needed an overcoat on the score of health.
At Fort Lafayette we were well fed; but I have never been able to understand by what rule or principle of civilized warfare, an honorable prisoner of war could be immured for weeks in a stone casemate, among deserters, and prisoners under charges for violating the laws of war.
It gives me pleasure to state that I experienced great kindness from some of the
Federal officers during my imprisonment, and especially from
a Major Lee, who succeeded
Colonel Hill at
Johnson's Island.
He had lost an arm I think in
Gen. Sickle's corps at
Gettysburg.
The surgeon of whose humanity mention was made above, was not the only Federal officer who during my brief prison experience protested to his superiors against the inhumanity of the prison regimen.
The following statement can be vouched for as strictly accurate:
Rock Island prison, 1864-5.
I record here my experience in Rock Island Prison, simply as a contribution to history.
For the truth of what I state, in some cases I refer to official documents, and in others I refer to thousands of witnesses yet living.
The treatment of prisoners in Northern prisons is a subject that has received little attention from the press, and consequently is little understood.
The charges of cruelty to prisoners, made with such confidence against the
South, on a recent occasion, for the purpose of political aggrandizement, and which recalls the old story of “Stop thief,” where the thief bawled the loudest, makes it necessary in common justice to ventilate the
Northern prisons.
This could not have been done within the past eleven years for obvious reasons.
The Federal soldier returning home to a land of plenty, his necessities anticipated by benevolent associations, his spirits cheered by the sympathy of a grateful people, and his services rewarded with bounties and pensions by a generous Government, found leisure and encouragement to recount his sufferings and privations to eager listeners, and the air was filled with cries for vengeance on his jailors.
But the
Confederate soldier returning home from a Northern prison to a land of famine, found his substance wasted and his energies enfeebled; disfranchised and beggared, he forgot
[
282]
his past sufferings in his present wretchedness; he had neither the time to lament, nor the inclination to talk about his treatment in prison; he was thankful if his health permitted him to labor for those dearer to him than himself, and for the cripple and the invalid there was no resource.
There was no lack of sympathy, but his friends were the poor.
Thus it happened that the cruelty practised in Northern prisons never came to light.
The victor monopolized the story of suffering as well as the spoils.
I arrived at Rock Island prison,
Illinois, on the 16th January, 1864, in company with about fifty other prisoners, from
Columbus, Kentucky.
Before entering the prison we were drawn up in a line and searched; the snow was deep, and the operation prolonged a most unreasonable time.
We were then conducted within the prison to
Barrack No. 52, and again searched — this time any small change we had about our persons was taken away and placed to our credit with an officer called the
Commissary of Prisoners.
The first search was probably for arms or other contraband articles.
The prison regulations were then read, and we were dismissed.
Rock Island is in the
Mississippi river, about fifteen hundred miles above New Orleans, connected with the city of
Rock Island, Illinois, on the
East, and the city of
Davenport, Iowa, on the
West, by a bridge.
It is about three miles in length.
The prison was 1,250 feet in length by 878 feet in width, enclosing twenty-five acres. The enclosure was a plank fence, about sixteen feet high, on the outside of which a parapet was built about twelve feet from the ground.
Here sentinels were placed over-looking the prison.
About twenty feet from the fence, on the inside, was what was called the “Dead line” --at first marked with stakes, afterwards by a ditch — over which it was death to pass.
The barracks were sixty feet from the fence, the width between each barrack thirty feet, and streets one hundred feet wide between each row of barracks.
Two avenues, one the length of the prison, and ninety feet wide, the other in length the width of the prison, and one hundred and thirty feet wide, divided the space enclosed into four equal divisions each containing twenty-one barracks, making a total of eighty-four.
These barracks were each one hundred feet long by twenty-two feet wide, and contained three tiers of bunks — platforms of rough plank for sleeping.
About fifteen feet of the rear of the room was partitioned off for a cook-room, and was furnished with a stove and boiler.
The main room had two stoves for burning coal — this article being cheap and abundant.
Each barrack was constructed to receive one hundred and twenty men. The sinks were first erected in the centre of the streets, but afterwards built on the dead line; there being no sewerage, tubs were used, and details of prisoners every morning carried the tubs to the river, a most disgusting duty.
Towards the end of the war a sewer was made in one of the avenues extending to the river, the prisoners being employed in blasting rock for that purpose.
[
283]
The chief executive officers were a commandant of the post and a provost marshal, the latter having the immediate care and government of the prisoners, assisted by a number of deputies.
The parapet was first guarded by a regiment of old men, called Greybeards, afterwards by the 197th Pennsylvania Volunteers, and from July, 1864, by the 108th United States Colored Infantry.
The duty of calling the roll of prisoners was performed by several companies of the Fourth Veteran Reserve Corps.
These men were soldiers who had seen service in various regiments, and on account of wounds or other disabilities were formed into corps for prison duty.
Each barrack was in charge of a prisoner appointed by the
provost marshal, called the orderly of the barrack.
All orders concerning the prisoners were communicated to these orderlies by the
provost marshal.
The roll was called three times a day, and the barracks inspected every morning.
One letter only could be written each week, not to exceed a page, and no subject concerning the prison or its regulations could be referred to. Newspapers were prohibited.
The last two precautions were, however, frequently evaded.
Thrifty Federal soldiers employed in the prison would receive a number of letters collected by a prisoner, and mail them outside the prison for a fee of twenty-five cents on each letter.
Newspapers were brought in by the same parties and sold for twenty-five cents a number.
Occasionally they were searched and discovered, and tied up by the thumbs.
Frequent searches were made of the barracks for clothing.
In these searches the
provost marshal's men would carry off whatever
they considered surplus clothing, leaving scant wardrobes to those unfortunates who had not prepared for the visit by secreting their extra drawers, shirt, &c. The sutler of the post supplied prisoners who had money to their credit with the commissary of prisoners with such articles as they needed.
This was done through orders, the sutler's wagon delivering the goods once a week.
This arrangement, however, ceased as regards any article of food, in August, 1864.
I refer to the order in another place.
The winter of 1863-4 was intensely cold.
During this time some poor fellows were without blankets, and some even without shoes.
They would huddle around the stoves at night and try to sleep.
The feet of those who had no shoes, or were poorly protected, became sore and swollen, and in one case that I saw, mortification no doubt ensued, for the man was taken from my barrack to the hospital and died in a few days.
The severity of the weather caused cleanliness of person and clothing to be disregarded by some, and as a consequence scarcely a man escaped the itch.
Early in 1864 the small-pox broke out in the prison.
The authorities were not prepared for the appearance of this fearful disease — the hospitals not being finished.
The infected and the healthy men were in the same barrack.
The disease spread so rapidly there was no room in the buildings outside the prison, and certain barracks within the enclosure were set apart for
[
284]
small-pox hospitals.
Prisoners who had had the small-pox were detailed for nurses to those who were sick.
The surgeons vaccinated the men at intervals, but apparently with little effect.
The death rate at this time was alarming.
On the 9th March, 1864, twenty-nine men had died in the hospital from my barrack, which did not have its full complement of men. I noted the names of the men to that date.
They are the following:
R. Shed,
T. J. Smith, Allen Screws,
D. W. Sandlin,
Joe Shipp,
D. L. Trundle,
J. H. Wood,
J. J. Webster,
J. J. Akins, Thomas Pace,
William Tatum,
W. H. Dotson,
W. R. Jones,
C. E. Middleton,
R. R. Thompson,
William T. St. John,
Samuel Hendrix,
Jere.
Therman,
E. Stallings,
E. Sapp,
Thomas Burton,
M. E. Smithpeter,
J. M. Ticer,
J. L. Smith,
John Graham,
T. W. Smallwood,
Jonathan Faw,
G. L. Underwood,
C. R. Mangrum.
Now assuming the barrack contained one hundred and twenty men, which was its full complement, the death rate to March 9, 1864, was twenty-five per cent.
The
provost marshal's abstract for May 12, 1865, has the following figures:
Number of prisoners received, | | 12,215 |
Died, | 1,945 | |
Entered United States navy, | 1,077 | |
Entered United States army, (frontier service), | 1,797 | |
Released, | 1,386 | |
Transferred, | 72 | |
Escaped, | 45 | |
Exchanged, | 3,729 | |
| | |
| | 10,051 |
Remaining in prison May 12, 1865, | | 2,164 |
| | |
As all the prisoners were discharged in June, 1865, this date (May 12) is near enough for our purpose.
It shows that nearly sixteen per cent. died during the eighteen months
Rock Island was used as a prison.
This number (1,945) includes those who were killed by the sentinels — the killed not being classified by the
provost marshal.
The number released (1,386) includes those who having offered to join the United States navy or army were rejected by the surgeons as physically disqualified.
More than fifty per cent. of the released were of this class.
The balance were principally Missourians, captured during
Price's last raid.
These claimed to be Union men, and having proved their loyalty to the satisfaction of the
Secretary of War, were released by his order.
The prisoners transferred were officers originally brought to
Rock Island, but afterwards sent to
Johnson's Island or other military prisons.
In April, 1864, the sentinels on the parapet commenced firing at the prisoners and into the barracks, and this practice continued
[
285]
while I remained.
I am ignorant as to the orders the sentinels received, but I know that the firing was indiscriminate, and apparently the mere caprice of the sentinels.
Going to the sinks at night was a most dangerous undertaking, for they were now built on the “dead line,” and lamps with reflectors were fastened to the plank fence — the sentinel above being unseen, while the man approaching the sink was in full view of the sentinel.
Frequently they would halt a prisoner and make him take off his pants in the street, and then order him to come to the sink in his drawers, (if he had any). I have heard the cocking of a gun presented at myself while going to the sink at night, but by jumping into an alley between the barracks I saved myself the exercise of walking to the sink in my drawers or from receiving the contents of the gun. I find this entry in my diary on June 10, 1864: “Attacked with diarrrhoea in the night.
Afraid to go near the sink.”
I cannot say that the sentinels had positive orders to shoot on each occasion, but that they received encouragement to do so, and were relieved of all responsibility for such acts, is certain from the following orders, which were publicly promulgated to the orderlies of barracks by the
provost marshal, to wit:
May 12, 1864.--Ordered, that no prisoner be out of his barracks after “taps.”
May 13, 1864.--Ordered, any prisoner shouting or making a noise will be shot.
It was noticed and discussed among the prisoners, that the shooting was most violent immediately after a Confederate success.
I noted some cases that came under my own observation, but by no means a complete list; in fact, the prisoners became so accustomed to the firing from the parapet, that unless it occurred near his side of the prison, a man would take little notice of it.
1864. | |
April 27-- | Prisoner shot by sentinel. |
May 27-- | One man killed and one wounded in the leg. |
June 9-- | Franks, Fourth Alabama Cavalry, killed last night at barrack No. 12.
He was shot by the sentinel on the parapet as he was about to step into the street.
His body fell into the barrack, and lay there till morning.
The men afraid to go near him during the night. |
22-- | Bannister Cantrell, Co. G., 18th Georgia, and James W. Ricks, Co. F,, 50th Georgia, were shot by the sentinel on the parapet.
They were on detail working in the ditch, and had stopped to drink some fresh water just brought to them. |
26-- | Prisoner shot in leg and arm while in his bunk at barrack 55. |
During August, and part of September, I was confined to my bunk with dysentery, and have few entries in may diary.
[
286]
1864. | |
September 26-- | William Ford, Co. D, Wood's Missouri Battery, of barrack 60, killed by sentinel on the parapet.
He was returning from the sink, and shot through the body at the rear of barrack 72. |
26-- | T. P. Robertson, Co. I, Twenty-fourth South Carolina, shot by sentinel on parapet, and wounded in the back, while sitting in front of barrack 38, about 8 o'clock this morning. |
26-- | T. J. Garrett, Co. K, Thirteenth Arkansas, shot by sentinel on parapet during the night while going to the sink. |
27-- | George R. Canthew, of barrack 28, shot by sentinel on parapet. |
28-- | Sentinel shot into barrack No. 12 through the window. |
October 4-- | Man killed in the frontier pen by negro sentinel. |
21-- | I was taken out of the prison and paroled, to remain at headquarters of the post. |
In none of the above cases were the men attempting to escape or violating any of the known rules of the prison.
The firing of the 26th September was regarded as the parting salute of the 197th Pennsylvania Volunteers, that regiment being relieved at guard-mount by the 108th United States Colored Infantry.
The first call for prisoners to join the
United States service was in March, 1864.
It was proposed to release all who offered to enter the Navy, and were rejected by the surgeon.
According to the
provost marshal's abstract 1,077 recruits were obtained.
The next call was on the 11th September, 1864.
This was for the purpose of organizing regiments for frontier service, that is, for the
Indian country.
For a time very few availed themselves of this chance to get something to eat, and repeated calls were made.
At length, a separate enclosure being built, it was announced that the gates would be open all night, and candidates would be received at any time.
Then a remarkable change took place.
The frontier service became quite popular.
Men who had ridiculed others for joining, decamped during the night and enrolled
themselves in the frontier service.
This latter arrangement partook rather of the character of a private speculation.
A certain
Judge Petty, of the oil regions of
Pennsylvania, came to
Rock Island with authority from the
President of the
United States, and offered a bounty of $100 to each man enlisted, with the assurance that such as were rejected by the surgeon should be released.
Each man enlisted was a substitute for a citizen of
Venango, Clarion, and other adjoining counties of
Pennsylvania, who had been drafted to serve in the United States army.
It was reported that these citizens paid $300 each to
Judge Petty to obtain a substitute, but whatever he received, I know
[
287]
that only $100 each was paid the enlisted men for the frontier service.
Captain H. R. Rathbone, United States army, came from
Washington, and mustered the men into service.
I was detailed to assist in preparing the muster-rolls, and can vouch for all the foregoing except the $300, which I leave with the citizens of
Venango, Clarion, and other counties represented in the war by the prisoners of
Rock Island.
If the report be true,
Judge Petty “struck oil” at
Rock Island for 1,797 times $200, or $359,400.
Until June 1st, 1864, no reasonable complaint could be made in regard to the food furnished the prisoners; but from that date until June, 1865, the inmates of
Rock Island were subjected to starvation and all its attendant horrors.
I know that this charge was denied by the officers of that prison at the very time the atrocity was being perpetrated.
God may forgive whoever caused the deed to be done, but surely there is little hope for whoever denies it now. The following is a copy of a circular from the
Commissary General of Prisoners, dated June 1st, 1864.
It is the ration ordered for each prisoner per day:
Pork or Bacon | 10 ounces, in lieu of fresh beef. |
Fresh beef | 14 ounces. | |
Flour or soft bread | 16 ounces. | |
Hard bread | 14 ounces, in lieu of flour or soft bread. |
Corn meal | 16 ounces, in lieu of flour or soft bread. |
Beans or peas | 12 1/2 pounds, | to 100 rations. |
Or rice or hominy | 8 pounds, |
Soap | 4 pounds, |
Vinegar | 3 quarts, |
Salt | 3 3/4 pounds, |
Now all this means only bread and meat--sixteen ounces of the former, and fourteen ounces of the latter; and we will add one-hundredth part of eight pounds of hominy.
For let the reader observe that if hominy is issued, rice or peas or beans is not issued.
Here, then, we have only three articles of food according to the official document, but in so far as that represents the quantities and the kind of articles issued to the prisoners, it is a fraud; as
Paul wrote the Galations, “Behold, before God, I lie not.”
Here is what the prisoners actually received:
Twelve ounces corn bread, four and a half ounces salt beef (usually unfit for human food). No man can conceive the effect of this diet.
To realize what he
would eat at the end of a month he must experience this treatment for a month.
Did the prisoners eat rats and mice and dogs when they could get them?
What would they not eat?
The cravings of hunger were never relieved.
One continued gnawing anguish, that sleep aggravated rather than appeased was ever present.
They did eat rats and mice to my knowledge.
The dogs were missing, and who will doubt that the starved wretches, who ate rats, had feasted on the dogs.
What difference is there between my statement and the official circular?
I say twelve ounces bread; it says sixteen ounces.
I say four and a half ounces salt beef; it says ten ounces salt pork.
I say two articles of
[
288]
food, the circular mentions three.
The bread we received was made of
corn meal, in loaves shaped like bricks, and about as hard.
The salt beef had a most offensive odor.
An orderly asked an officer of the prison to step into his barrack and smell the beef; he did so, but merely remarked he had often eaten worse.
Depravity had reached its limit in his case, for he was doing violence to his stomach in even smelling that beef.
I find this note in my diary July 10, 1864: “Nothing to eat till one o'clock,” and again September 18th: “Nothing to eat at all this day.”
For some reason the bread wagon did not come in; the bread was issued daily, and the meat which was issued every ten days, had been consumed.
There is not at first glance very much difference between my statement and the commissary's circular, and for a few days the difference in
quantity would be immaterial, but when the
quality of the food, and the weary sameness through many months is considered, even the commissary's allowance would have been a sumptuous repast.
Think of it for a moment.
We will take his bacon, and his beans, and his soft bread, that is all to be sure, but what a meal, when compared with the stinking salt beef, and the hard corn bread.
When the order reducing the ration, dated June 1st, 1864, went into effect, those prisoners who were fortunate enough to have money to their credit with the commissary, could still obtain flour from the sutler, and large quantities were brought in every week.
The commissary's journal would prove this, and at the same time show the scarcity of bread within the prison.
Prisoners who had no money wrote to their friends for food; and those who had no friends who were able to send them food, were not all neglected; for the
Christian women of the
North came to their assistance, with food and clothing; and continued active and untiring, even in the face of official insolence, until the order from the
Commissary General of Prisoners, dated
Washington, August 10th, 1864, cut the prisoners off from the outside world, and all hope of assistance.
No more food from friends; no more flour from the sutler; no more clothing; no prospect of exchange; no hope of release, no more visits from wife or mother.
Under these circumstances the wonder is that more men did not join the United States army.
Disease followed as a matter of course, and the death rate is fully accounted for.
On the 10th October, 1864, being a British subject, I addressed a protest to Lord Lyons then the
British minister at
Washington, from which I make the following extracts:
* * * I further declare that the food issued to us is unwholesome, insufficient and productive of disease; * * * that we are strictly prohibited by circular No. 4, dated Office of Commissary General of Prisoners, Washington, D. C., August 10th, 1864, from receiving, by purchase or otherwise, vegetables or other provisions, in consequence scurvy is prevalent and other diseases generated. * * * Subject as I am to the pangs of hunger, to disease, to a
[289]
violent death, I appeal to your lordship to demand a mitigation of the rigor of my present situation.
This was made known to the United States Government, by the
British minister, in a letter to
Mr. Seward, dated October 20th, 1864, in these words: * * * “
Wright complains very much of the quantity and quality of the food he gets as being insufficient and generative of disease.
I hope that his case may be attended to, and that I may hear something soon upon the subject.”
A few days after this I was paroled to assist in the clerical duties of the post adjutant's office, and remained there until released in June, 1865.
It must not be supposed that my correspondence with the
British minister left the prison in the prescribed channel.
I had tried that, and found that certain letters of mine did not reach him. My communications were smuggled out in the manner I have described in this paper, and sent under cover to friends in
St. Louis and
Albany, who mailed them.
I mention this because the
Secretary of War took some credit to himself for liberality in my case, as will be seen from the following extract of a letter addressed to
Mr. Seward:
* * * * * * * * *
Mr. Wright makes no complaint of harsh treatment, and the papers which he presents show that the officers who have had him in charge have rendered him every facility in submitting his appeal.
* * * * * * * * *
If
Mr. Seward was misled by this statement in regard to my treatment, he was certainly undeceived when he received the
British minister's note, dated October 20th, of which I have given an extract.
The wretched condition of the prisoners at
Rock Island was well known to the citizens of Rock Island City and
Davenport.
At the request of
Judge Grant of the latter city, on the 20th of September, 1864, I made a faithful statement of the treatment and condition of the prisoners; and for this purpose, in company with others, I visited a number of barracks.
The bread and the meat were carefully weighed, and the quality of the food truthfully reported.
The judge desired a plain statement, without exaggeration or comment, to use in an effort he was about to make at
Washington to ameliorate the condition of the prisoners.
As no change for the better took place, the presumption is that
Judge Grant did not succeed in his benevolent mission.
I have mentioned that the officers of the prison denied the charge of cruelty, at a time when the poor wretches within the walls were sinking under the starvation diet I have described.
That denial was made necessary in
[
290]
consequence of the following letter, which appeared in the
New York News in January, 1865:
[from a private Letter.]
* * * The condition and suffering of the
Rebel prisoners at
Rock Island is a source of agony to every heart not absolutely dead to the feelings of common humanity and the scantiest Christian mercy.
There are from six to eight thousand confined here.
Many have taken “the oath” --any oath to save themselves from actual starvation.
These released prisoners, though liberated at different intervals of time, all tell the same story.
The allowance to each man has been one small loaf of bread (it takes three to make a pound), and a piece of meat two inches square per day. This was the rations!
Lately it has been reduced.
Think of it reduced!
All the released ones say that no man can live on the rations given, and that there are men that would do anything to get enough to eat!
Such is the wretched, ravenous condition of these poor starving creatures, that several dogs which have come to the barracks with teams have fallen victims to their hunger, and they are trapping rats and mice for food, actually to save life.
Many of them are nearly naked, bare-footed, bare-headed, and without bed-clothes; exposed to ceaseless torture from the chill and pitiless winds of the
upper Mississippi.
Thus, naked and hungry, and in prison, enduring a wretchedness which no tongue can describe, no language tell, they suffer from day to day — each day their number growing less by death — death, their only comforter — their only merciful visitor!
God in heaven!
Shall these things continue?
Can we hope for success in our cause?
Will a merciful and just God bless and prosper it, if such cruel inhumanity is practiced by our rulers?
May we not provoke a terrible and just chastisement at His hands?
No Christian heart, knowing the facts, can feel otherwise.
Many charitable persons, influenced by no other motives than common humanity and Christian duty, have sent supplies of clothing to these prisoners, but they have not been permitted to reach them.
I have heard of sales of such clothing having been made across the river at
Davenport, at very low prices.
Is it possible that the authorities at
Washington know of and approve these things.
A good many have taken the oath, stating afterwards to citizens that they did so really to save them from starvation.
I learn that there are about five thousand confined here, who have resolved to die rather than do so. Although they are wrong, is there not a sublime heroism in the adherence of these men, amid such trials, to a cause which they believe to be right?
This exposure was denounced by a Chicago paper as “An infamous Rebel falsehood,” and “an attempt to justify the
Rebels in starving our prisoners.”
The
Chicago journalist may be excused on the ground of ignorance, but not so the officers of the prison;
[
291]
as principals or as tools they committed this outrage on humanity for the sake of their commissions, like the Irish jurors portrayed by
Curran, “Conscience swung from its moorings, and they sought safety for themselves in the surrender of the victims.”
But hunger was not the only cause of suffering, clothing was prohibited.
The provost marshal took possession of all boxes and packages addressed to prisoners — these were opened and examined — and until August, 1864, with the exception of some pilfering, usually reached the owner; but after that date, the prisoners were not permitted to receive anything sent by friends or relatives.
How much clothing and provisions fell into the hands of the
provost marshal and his men after August, will never be known.
What they did with the booty may be readily guessed.
On the 22d February, 1865, three Confederate officers arrived, and distributed clothing to the prisoners, but the worst part of the winter had then been endured, for want of that covering the jailors had taken away.
I have given my own experience until October, 1864, but I know that the suffering was even more terrible during the following winter.
In a climate where the well clothed sentinels were relieved at short intervals to prevent their freezing to death, nature demands a generous food to sustain life; but the last winter in Rock Island prison presented a scene of destitution only to be equaled by a crew of cast-aways in the frozen ocean, and this too where the sound of Sabbath bells were heard.
It was a pleasant sound to many who felt that their troubles were nearly ended; it seemed a prelude to the melody that awaited them in a better land.
But to those who could not die, whose vitality doomed them to suffer, what a mockery the sound seemed to them; what rebellious thoughts of God's injustice took possession of their souls, and would not down while tortured with the cravings of hunger.
I have realized these things.
I have noted one day that I tasted no food.
It was Sunday the 18th September, 1864.
I was recovering from a severe attack of dysentery.
I was very hungry.
The church bells were ringing as I eagerly watched the great gate of the prison hoping it would open, and the bread wagon would come in, but hour after hour passed away, and there was no sign, evening came on and I gave up all hope.
I had lingered near that gate all day. Hunger is delirium, and the gospel is not for the famished body.
The good men who sometimes preached for us had had their breakfasts.
The Government that sent us preachers would not send us bread.
[
292]
Dr. Handy has preserved in his letter-book an original copy of