hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register 4 4 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 20. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 1 1 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition. 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 6 results in 5 document sections:

Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register, Genealogical Register (search)
d. 30 Nov. 1669. 2. Samuel, s. of Samuel (1), by w. Mary, had Mary, b. 1 Aug. 1681, d. May 1682; Samuel, b. 8 Ap. 1683, a weaver, d. s. p., and made Samuel, son of his brother Ebenezer, his principal heir by will dated 13 June 1753, proved 7 Feb. 1775; John, b. 22 Jan. 1685-6, m. Elizabeth Morse 24 Oct. 1712, and d. 29 Feb. 1743-4; Anna, b. 30 Ap. 1668, d. 22 July 1690; Mary, b. 17 Sept. 1690, m. Joseph Child 8 July 1713; Hannah, b. 10 Dec. 1692, d. unm. 3 Nov. 1741; Abigail, b. 6 June 169tearns (pub. 12 Oct. 1745), and had Thomas, b. 4 Oct. 1746; d. 27 May 1749; Owen, b. 15 July 1748, d. 20 Oct. 1748; Anne (or Nancy), b. 3 Ap. 1750, m. Josiah Moore 22 Aug. 1782, and d. June 1835; Owen, b. 26 Jan. 1751-2, grad. H. C. 1770, d. 7 Feb. 1775; Sarah, b. 27 Sept. 1753, m. Abel Moore 16 Oct. 1776, and m. Israel Porter 10 Mar. 1796; Mary, b. 2 Nov. 1755, d. 11 Sept. 1756; Thomas, b. 17 July 1757; Mary, b. 1 Ap. 1759, d. 14 Nov. 1762; Lucy, b. 26 Mar. 1762, m. Jonathan Hunnewell 10 Feb
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register, T. (search)
Holmes 13 Sept. 1664, and d. before 16 Ap. 1682; Samuel, b. 20 Oct. 1648. Samuel the f. resided near the easterly corner of Mount Auburn Street, and Coolidge Avenue (which until 1754 was included in Wat.), was Deacon, Selectman, and Representative; d. 30 Nov. 1669. 2. Samuel, s. of Samuel (1), by w. Mary, had Mary, b. 1 Aug. 1681, d. May 1682; Samuel, b. 8 Ap. 1683, a weaver, d. s. p., and made Samuel, son of his brother Ebenezer, his principal heir by will dated 13 June 1753, proved 7 Feb. 1775; John, b. 22 Jan. 1685-6, m. Elizabeth Morse 24 Oct. 1712, and d. 29 Feb. 1743-4; Anna, b. 30 Ap. 1668, d. 22 July 1690; Mary, b. 17 Sept. 1690, m. Joseph Child 8 July 1713; Hannah, b. 10 Dec. 1692, d. unm. 3 Nov. 1741; Abigail, b. 6 June 1694; Mercy, b. 2 Jan. 1697-8; Sarah, b. 30 Nov. 1699, d. unm. 13 June 1727; Ebenezer, b. 17 Mar. 1703-4. Samuel the f. inherited the homestead, was a Lieutenant, and d. 21 Oct. 1726; his w. Mary d. 17 Aug. 1725. 3. Ebenezer, s. of Samuel (2), m. S
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register, W. (search)
ildren, Mary Breed, Rebecca, and Sarah, and granddaughter Mary, dau. of Hannah Giles, deceased. As his will was proved in Middlesex County it is probable that he d. here, having left Boston during the siege. 4. Owen, s. of William (2), m. Sarah Stearns (pub. 12 Oct. 1745), and had Thomas, b. 4 Oct. 1746; d. 27 May 1749; Owen, b. 15 July 1748, d. 20 Oct. 1748; Anne (or Nancy), b. 3 Ap. 1750, m. Josiah Moore 22 Aug. 1782, and d. June 1835; Owen, b. 26 Jan. 1751-2, grad. H. C. 1770, d. 7 Feb. 1775; Sarah, b. 27 Sept. 1753, m. Abel Moore 16 Oct. 1776, and m. Israel Porter 10 Mar. 1796; Mary, b. 2 Nov. 1755, d. 11 Sept. 1756; Thomas, b. 17 July 1757; Mary, b. 1 Ap. 1759, d. 14 Nov. 1762; Lucy, b. 26 Mar. 1762, m. Jonathan Hunnewell 10 Feb. 1785, and prob. d. before 1792; Elizabeth, bap. 11 Dec. 1763, d. unm. Nov. 1786; William, b. 19 Sept. 1765, d. Sept. 1786; John, b. 25 Dec. 1768, grad. H. C. 1786, and d. Ap. 1788. Owen the f. was a tailor, inherited the homestead, and dealt so
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 20. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.25 (search)
se or sat in judgment to be during the pleasure of their several constituents. And they who bore the sword of power were bidden to arm and hold themselves in readiness to execute the commands of the General Congress of this province and this committee. Such was, indeed, that clear and logical conception which the Mecklenburg patriots of 1775 were foremost to form of the civil status created for the American colonies by the address of both houses of Parliament to the Crown, adopted February 7, 1775, declaring the colony of Massachusetts in a state of actual rebellion, and constructively passing the same sentence of outlawry on all the other colonies which were giving her aid and comfort. Fellow-citizens of North Carolina, it is not quite enough to say that the Mecklenburg patriots of 1775 won and wear the unique fame of the precursors of American Independence. The North Carolina Koh-i-noor blazes from a broader facet with a finer light. The Mecklenburg patriots of 1775 als
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 6, 10th edition., Chapter 30: (search)
ies of his nature. He took a leading part in the conduct of affairs, just as the people of America were discussing the character of the new Revenue Act, which the King had not suggested; which no living member of the cabinet would own; which Grafton, the Prime Minister, described as absurd; but which was left as the fatal bequest of Charles Townshend to his successors and his country. Grafton's Autobiography; Compare speeches of Camden, of Grafton, of Shelburne, in the House of Lords, 7 Feb. 1775, and of Camden and Grafton, 5 March, 1776. The new taxes were not to be collected till the twentieth of November; and should the Sons of Liberty effect a universal agreement to send for no more goods from Britain, no customs would, even then, fall due. But such a confederacy, said Bernard, Bernard to Shelburne, 31 August, 7 September, 1767. will be impracticable without violence; and he advised a regiment of soldiers as the surest way of inspiring notions of acquiescence and submis