hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 2,462 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 692 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 10 516 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 3, 15th edition. 418 0 Browse Search
C. Julius Caesar, Gallic War 358 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 4, 15th edition. 298 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 230 0 Browse Search
H. Wager Halleck , A. M. , Lieut. of Engineers, U. S. Army ., Elements of Military Art and Science; or, Course of Instruction in Strategy, Fortification, Tactis of Battles &c., Embracing the Duties of Staff, Infantry, Cavalry, Artillery and Engineers. Adapted to the Use of Volunteers and Militia. 190 0 Browse Search
C. Edwards Lester, Life and public services of Charles Sumner: Born Jan. 6, 1811. Died March 11, 1874. 186 0 Browse Search
George Ticknor, Life, letters and journals of George Ticknor (ed. George Hillard) 182 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: December 16, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for France (France) or search for France (France) in all documents.

Your search returned 43 results in 4 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: December 16, 1861., [Electronic resource], Federal relations with foreign Powers. (search)
can easily see how the inadvertence occurred.--France seems to have mistaken a mere casual and ephemh as have sometimes happened in the history of France herself, for a war which has flagrantly separatwo which seem so to construe appearances, and France is one of them. Are the judgments of these twappily subsisted between the United States and France. The paper, as understood, while implyinge other hand, the rights which it asserts that France expects as a neutral, from the United States, rthrowing it, respect those rights in favor of France and of every other friendly nation. In any calaws of our own country. What, then, does France claim of us that we do not accord to her? Nothing. What do we refuse to France by declining to receive the communication sent to us through the hgovernments. The United States will hope that France will not think it necessary to adhere to and pinfluence of any foreign State. This is so in France. It is not less so in this country. Down dee[2 more...]
The Daily Dispatch: December 16, 1861., [Electronic resource], Federal relations with foreign Powers. (search)
, and M. Bischofswerder, envoy of the King of Prussia, the object of which was to concert a plan for the dismemberment of France, then agitated by the throes of that mighty Revolution which threw down all the old landmarks of nations, and shook Europned a treaty to the effect indicated. In pursuance of this treaty, the Duke of Brunswick and the King of Prussia entered France with an army of 110,000 men within less than a mouth after; and the former, disguising his real object under the pretencece de la Concorde, the army which had been relied on to enforce the bloody threat was flying before the young recruits of France, after having lost one-half of its force; the King who had headed the expedition was a suppliant for mercy at the hands oso lately been hounding on to massacre and plunder. Louis XVI. was not restored, the French youth were not intimidated, France was not dismembered. It is, to us, a matter of astonishment that a lesson so fraught with instruction, should have b
es on the question — the action of England and France in regard to the treaty of Paris.--the Final Anvention standing alone might bind England and France to pursue and punish the privateers of the Souese people as we choose, and they (England and France) could only express their regrets on the scoreion, unless we intended that they (England and France) shall be made parties to our controversy, and them with moderation and candor. In 1856 France, Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, Sardinia, andnd eternal in its application and obligation. France especially invited the United States to accedeualifying article, limiting the obligations of France to the United States to a narrower range than ty towards the United States. I know that France is a friend, and means to be just and equal tothe unqualified execution of the Convention by France, then the fault clearly must be inherent in th parties to it have acceded. We know that France has a high and generous ambition. We shall wa[13 more...]
Great Britain, which bore upon the rights of neutrals and their responsibilities. The Governments of Great Britain, France and Spain have issued proclamations that the Confederate States were viewed, considered, and treated as belligerents, and knowing that the ports of Great Britain, France, Spain, and Holland, in the West Indies, were open to their vessels, and that they were admitted to all the courtesies and protection vessels of the United States receive, every aid and attention beings from the other belligerent to permit them to pass free." Report and assumption gave them the title of Ministers to France and England, but inasmuch as they had not been received by either of these powers, I did not conceive they had immunity asel; his father had visited them, and introduced them as ministers of the Confederate States, on their way to England and France. They went in the steamer with the knowledge and consent of the captain, who endeavored afterwards to conceal them b