hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
U. S. Grant 194 0 Browse Search
R. E. Lee 130 0 Browse Search
Robert E. Lee 115 11 Browse Search
J. Longstreet 114 0 Browse Search
Fitzhugh Lee 111 13 Browse Search
A. P. Hill 110 6 Browse Search
United States (United States) 104 0 Browse Search
W. H. F. Lee 100 2 Browse Search
S. D. Ramseur 95 1 Browse Search
George G. Meade 88 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). Search the whole document.

Found 469 total hits in 111 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
Montgomery (Alabama, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
funds were not forwarded. I am fully aware that you have done all in your power to procure funds, and I dislike to annoy you on the subject, but the district commissaries urge the matter so strongly upon me, that I again call your attention to the helpless condition in which we are placed for want of funds. To show how much we have lost in the past, and how hopeless is the prospect for the future without funds, I make the following extract of a letter just received from Major Guy at Montgomery. * * * * * * * * * Our present indebtedness is no less than two millions of dollars. I am entirely destitute of credit, and therefore can procure nothing without money, as the fruitlessness of the recent appeal to the planters, as suggested by you, fully testifies. And I am now without a dollar for hospital or any other purposes; cannot even pay off the employees of the office, and believe that my receipt of stores in the last ten months have been cut short, say, 200,000 pounds bacon
Georgetown, S. C. (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
ies and shipments cannot be approximated, because it will depend upon the number of ports held by us and the effectiveness of the blockade. The Secretary of War has, upon my application, directed the attention of the Engineer Bureau to Georgetown, South Carolina, to see if it can be so protected with guns and works as to secure the safety of vessels entering and departing. The Secretary of the Navy has directed his officers to render aid in protecting vessels coming into Saint Marks, Florida. ntic and Gulf coast. Arrangements are already in progress to secure lead, saltpetre, sheet copper, leather, &c., along the Florida coast. In view of these facts, I would respectfully recommend that proper guns and works be placed at Georgetown, South Carolina, at the mouth of the Santee river, and at Saint Marks and Apalachicola, Florida; that an engineer officer be designated to examine other inlets or places on the coast where vessels may enter, and to provide protection for them; that the
Weldon, N. C. (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
to the currency and the subsistence of the army. (Signed) L. B. Northrup, C. G. S. Bureau of Subsistence, Richmond, February 12th, 1865. No. 3. Statement of meat en route to Richmond.   rations. From Charleston, through blockade:   2,018 cans meats, 72 pounds, 145,296290,592  1,105 barrels pork, 200 pounds, 221,000663,000  439 tierces beef, 304 pounds, 133,456266,912  49 casks bacon, 600 pounds, 29,40088,200 From Georgia:   60,000 pounds bacon180,000 From Weldon, North Carolina: This bacon was received under contract for delivery of cotton in exchange. Considerable receipts are expected from this source if cotton be promptly furnished and transportation for same provided.   80,000 pounds bacon240,000 At Greensboroa:   4,000 pounds pork12,000  500 boxes, 36,000 pounds, meat72,000 At Richmond:   30,000 pounds pork90,000 En route from interior:   25,000 pounds pork75,000      1,977,704 From Georgia, contingent upon communications
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
if money and transportation be provided. About 500,000 pounds of sugar and large quantities of rice, ordered from South Carolina, a portion of which is now en route to Richmond.  full rations. In depot at Richmond, 30,000 pounds coffee500,000 as follows: For purchases in Virginia$4,700,000 00 For purchases in North Carolina1,600,000 00 For purchases in South Carolina600,000 00 For purchases in Georgia6,900,000 00 For purchases in Mississippi1,250,000 00 For purchases in Alabama1,his Bureau1,000,000 00 For Major R. W. N. Noland, Northeastern Virginia750,000 00 For North Carolina800,000 00 For South Carolina800,000 00 For Alabama900,000 00 For Mississippi800,000 00 For Tennessee (Bristol)500,000 00 Remainder for hospita (Signed) Northrup, C. G. S. Augusta, Georgia, February 7, 1865. Colonel L. B. Northrup: Shipments not allowed on South Carolina road. Sending stores to Washington. As I have no means of shipping, I will reduce prices down to the schedule soon.
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
en instituted by Major Shelby, to send forward supplies to this army. This is especially important since the loss of East Tennessee, where operations had been set on foot of a most pomising character. I make no suggestions here as to the alternatShelby, Jr., in Southwest Virginia, reports his ability to procure 100,000 bushels corn and wheat in that section and East Tennessee, if money and transportation be provided. About 500,000 pounds of sugar and large quantities of rice, ordered from0 00 For North Carolina800,000 00 For South Carolina800,000 00 For Alabama900,000 00 For Mississippi800,000 00 For Tennessee (Bristol)500,000 00 Remainder for hospitals, tobacco and the miscellaneous service of the department950,000 00 Ths. Arrangements were made in 1862-3, to bring cattle from those States and put them on the grass lands of Virginia and Tennessee, but the long drive, want of good grass on the way, caused the attempt, which was made with a few droves, to fail. S
Raleigh (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
ice Chief Commissary of North Carolina, Greensboroa, 2d February, 1865. Colonel L. B. Northrup, Commissary-General, Richmond, Virginia: Colonel--* * * My officers are without funds, and their efforts to secure subsistence are paralyzed in consequence of same. Producers are refusing to sell even at market prices, because they say the Government will not pay. Something should be done by the Treasury Department to meet the drafts which have been passed to their credit at the depository at Raleigh, but for which not one cent has been sent forward to meet same. Outside purchasers have money, and are buying largely, while our officers and agents have to take a back seat and await the arrival of funds. * * (Signed) James Sloan, Major and Chief C. S. No. 10. Salt. The supply of salt has always been sufficient, and the Virginia works were able to meet the demand for the army; but in view of the possible loss of the country in which they are situated, arrangements were m
Charleston (South Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
ith report of Commissary General of 9th instant. (Signed) L. B. Northrup, C. G. S. Subsistence Bureau, February 13th, 1865. No. 4. Statement of bread Stuffs en route to Richmond.  rations. At Charlotte Junction, 470 sacks, 940 bushels corn47,000 At Greensboroa, North Carolina, 2,840 sacks, 5,680 bushels corn284,000 At Greensboroa, 270 bags flour27,000 From Florence, South Carolina, 4,000 bushels corn200,000 From Augusta, Georgia, 400 sacks flour40,000 From Charleston, South Carolina, 2,000 bushels corn100,000 From Greensboroa, North Carolina, 400 bushels wheat20,000    718,000 Reported by Major H. Crunston, Augusta, Georgia, as purchased by him along Savannah river, near Augusta, 80,000 bushels corn4,000,000 Reported by Major A. M. Allen, Columbus, Georgia:  On hand January 2d, 80,000 bushels corn4,000,000   Number of rations8,718,000   Note.--Major Isaac Shelby, Jr., in Southwest Virginia, reports his ability to procure 100,000 bushels corn and <
Virginia (Virginia, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
f the stringent necessity (for the safety of Richmond, of the State of Virginia, and probably of the Confederacy), that accumulations of suppf rations8,718,000   Note.--Major Isaac Shelby, Jr., in Southwest Virginia, reports his ability to procure 100,000 bushels corn and wheancy, is $15,000,000, as follows: For Major R. Tannahill, Southeastern Virginia$2,500,000 00 For Major R. J. Moses, Georgia4,000,000 00 For Southwestern Virginia2,000,000 00 For this Bureau1,000,000 00 For Major R. W. N. Noland, Northeastern Virginia750,000 00 For North CaroNortheastern Virginia750,000 00 For North Carolina800,000 00 For South Carolina800,000 00 For Alabama900,000 00 For Mississippi800,000 00 For Tennessee (Bristol)500,000 00 Remainder funds has been furnished. For example, of the $2,000,000 for Southwest Virginia, there are drafts here for collection for considerably above matter, and he then assumed the making of a contract with the State of Virginia, which I had considered and declined to make. Respectfully,
Charlotte (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
d eight cars per day. Will now go forward more promptly. December 18th--Major Love, Charlotte, North Carolina: Shipped one car load corn to-day. December 19th--Captain Francis, Augusta, Georgian. February 8, 1865--Unless transportation is increased much subsistence will be lost in Charlotte, N. C. E. M. Love, Major and C. S. Letters. December 19--Major Love, Charlotte, North CaroCharlotte, North Carolina, advises that he had shipped two car loads of his own corn, and that three car loads belonging to Commissary Department await transportation. December 18--Major A. M. Allen, Columbus, Georgiad during the year and reports made on them, now on record. Only recently stores were burnt at Charlotte, because not removed; between here and Wilmington recently there have been great delays in moving supplies, and the stores now at Charlotte are liable to loss for want of transportation. (Signed) L. B. Northrup, C. G. S. No. 14. Bureau of Subsistence, Richmond, February 11, 1865.
Wilmington, N. C. (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): chapter 2.12
ly referred to Secretary of War in connection with my report of the 9th. Many instances have occurred during the year and reports made on them, now on record. Only recently stores were burnt at Charlotte, because not removed; between here and Wilmington recently there have been great delays in moving supplies, and the stores now at Charlotte are liable to loss for want of transportation. (Signed) L. B. Northrup, C. G. S. No. 14. Bureau of Subsistence, Richmond, February 11, 1865. through the several bureaux of the War Department, will be sufficient to make all purchases of supplies for the War Department, and shipments for the Treasury Department, through the blockaded ports. The fall of Fort Fisher, and the loss of Wilmington as a port, will diminish the receipt of supplies and shipment of cotton through the blockaded ports. The quantity of these supplies and shipments cannot be approximated, because it will depend upon the number of ports held by us and the effect
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...