Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: July 3, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Paris or search for Paris in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:

Intervention. The letters from the New York Herald's Paris correspondents state that the Count de Persigny arrived in London on the 11th of June, about two days before the debates occurred in the houses of Lords and Commons, and the essential point of the whole subject is to be found in the assertion that the Count was entrusted by Napoleon with the negotiation of the terms of a plan of "mediation" with England. The assumption obtained a very general credence in Paris from the fact that the Patrie of the 11th instant circulated the following paragraph in larger type than usual:--"We are assured that negotiations are about to commence in London to arrive at an under standing which may enable proposals to be made for a mediation in American affairs. If the negotiations in question succeed, the mediation of England and France will be tendered simultaneously, and in identical terms, to the belligerent parties."
important, much more so than the telegraphic summary before published would have led us to believe. The following editorial in the Herald will show with what solicitude that paper regards the present attitude of foreign powers relative to intervention: British insolence and American Power. [From the New York Herald, June 27] The details of the news by the Arabia are of a much more decided character than the telegraphic summary which we published on Wednesday seemed to indicate. Our Paris correspondence, too, throws great additional light upon the movements now going on in France and England. It appears that the programme is, that France will take the lead in the "mediation" or intervention scheme for the settlement of the civil war in America, while England secretly pledges her moral, and if necessary, her physical, support; that the basis of the intervention is to be, if not separation as a sinc qua non, at least a decision of the question by the votes of the people of the