hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
U. S. Grant 47 1 Browse Search
J. C. Pemberton 28 2 Browse Search
Fitzhugh Lee 24 0 Browse Search
France (France) 18 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Roebuck 13 13 Browse Search
John Morgan 13 1 Browse Search
Johnston 11 1 Browse Search
Indiana (Indiana, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Stonewall Jackson 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 20, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 109 total hits in 41 results.

1 2 3 4 5
Sunderland (Massachusetts, United States) (search for this): article 11
he had authority to write to the French Emperor when ever he wanted to see him--[a laugh]--and I said to him in effect, "Suppose, for the purpose of ascertaining whether this rumor be true, we go across and ask at once for an audience." [A laugh] For, sir, I know the Treasury Bench right well. I know they are wonderfully expert at circulating rumors; indeed, when they have an object in view, there is hardly any rumor they won't circulate. [A laugh] My letter to the honorable member from Sunderland got to Patis, and subsequently we had the audience asked for. I am now going to make a statement which the Under Secretary for Foreign Affairs may think somewhat surprising, but it is true for all that. The Emperor of the French said, and he gave me authority to repeat it here, "As soon as I learned that that rumor was circulating in England, I gave instructions to my Ambassador to deny the truth of it. Nay, more, I instructed him to say that my feeling was not, indeed, exactly the same a
Puebla (Puebla, Mexico) (search for this): article 11
ssuredly be regarded by the friends of peace between Europe and America, peace between North and South, and freedom in both, as an acquisition to their good cause. The Standard ridicules the idea of withholding recognition of the South for fear of war with the North. The Paris correspondent of the London Post says: There seems to be no doubt of the Emperor having lately received the Southern envoy, Mr. Sudell. That his Majesty should have done this so soon after the fall of Puebla gives rice to speculation, and no doubt to many false conclusions. France has probably, since the occupation of Mexico, international reasons to watch what interest the American war. The Paris correspondence of the London News says: Butlier's Correspondence, referring to the statement in the Times that the Emperor had again proposed to England to recognize the Confederate States, asserts that, on the contrary, it is the Cabinet of St. James which has this time taken the initiati
Sheffield (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 11
e member for Sunderland, said:"Sire, we don't dread the winter, although we know that great misery must of necessity be entailed upon our manufacturing population if the cotton famine continue; but we, Sire, desire to avert from our countrymen the community that must arise from the continent on of that famine." Mr. George Gray made the following reply to this statement: I can only say that I am utterly unable to explain the discrepancy between the honorable and learned member for Sheffield's statement and the fact that Her Majesty's Government received no such communication It has been stated that the communication which was well known to have been made last year to Her Majesty's Government, on the part of the Emperor of the French, proposing a meditation between the contending parties in America, was transmitted by, Earl Russell to Lord Lyons, and by Lord Lyons handed to Mr. Seward, by which means Mr. Seward received information which would otherwise have been with held fro
Madrid (Spain) (search for this): article 11
do so there can be no question. The isolated efforts of French diplomacy have failed. The question asked here is, "Has not the situation changed? Would not the united action of England and France for peace be now listened to at Washington?" The Times'sParis correspondent repeats the statement that the rebels, with the sanction of the Emperor of France, have applied to Spain for recognition, offering to guarantee to her in case of recognition, the possession of Cuba. It is thought in Madrid that, in any case, the Emperor of France will not much longer postpone recognizing the Confederacy. Mr. Lindray, in a letter to the Times, confirms the statements of Mr. Roebuck, respecting their interview with the Emperor of France. On the other hand, Mr. Layard, in the name of the Government, gave again an emphatically denial to the truth of Mr. Roebuck's statements. The Times prefers the concurrent and positive statements of members of the Cabinet to those of Mr. Roebuck and Mr. Li
Lancaster (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 11
of it. I give you full liberty to state to the English House of Commons this my wish and to say to them that I have determined in all things."--and I will quote his words-- "I have determined in all things to act with England, and more than all things I have determined to act with her as regards America." [Hear, hear.] A large portion of our manufacturing population have been for some months living upon charity. Now, there is very soon acquired a habit of idleness, and I have learned from Lancashire that at the present time an unwillingness to labor is creeping upon the people, and if we carry them through the coming winter in idleness, we don't know what may be the consequence to our manufacturing population. Again, sir, I will quote the words of His Majesty the Emperor of the French, and they are very remarkable words He said: "I am afraid of the coming winter with respect to my manufacturing population." [Hear] And my honorable friend, the member for Sunderland, said:"Sire, we don
France (France) (search for this): article 11
arrive this country had many traditional relations and interests. France, by her action in Mexico, had engagements which prevented her recog's incitements to servile rebellion, but he denies that England and France can abate the miseries of the contest by such an act as the recognigives rice to speculation, and no doubt to many false conclusions. France has probably, since the occupation of Mexico, international reasons the situation changed? Would not the united action of England and France for peace be now listened to at Washington?" The Times'sParis the statement that the rebels, with the sanction of the Emperor of France, have applied to Spain for recognition, offering to guarantee to heof Cuba. It is thought in Madrid that, in any case, the Emperor of France will not much longer postpone recognizing the Confederacy. Mr.ents of Mr. Roebuck, respecting their interview with the Emperor of France. On the other hand, Mr. Layard, in the name of the Government, gav
Rhode Island (Rhode Island, United States) (search for this): article 11
hat the rebels, with the sanction of the Emperor of France, have applied to Spain for recognition, offering to guarantee to her in case of recognition, the possession of Cuba. It is thought in Madrid that, in any case, the Emperor of France will not much longer postpone recognizing the Confederacy. Mr. Lindray, in a letter to the Times, confirms the statements of Mr. Roebuck, respecting their interview with the Emperor of France. On the other hand, Mr. Layard, in the name of the Government, gave again an emphatically denial to the truth of Mr. Roebuck's statements. The Times prefers the concurrent and positive statements of members of the Cabinet to those of Mr. Roebuck and Mr. Lindsay, and thinks that the letter must have misunderstood the Emperor. The Times has an inflammatory letter, recounting the particulars of the firing upon the blockade runner Margaret and Jessie by the Union Rhode Island, and branding one of the most unjustifiable outrages to neutral rights.
Cuba (Cuba) (search for this): article 11
e South if England would do so there can be no question. The isolated efforts of French diplomacy have failed. The question asked here is, "Has not the situation changed? Would not the united action of England and France for peace be now listened to at Washington?" The Times'sParis correspondent repeats the statement that the rebels, with the sanction of the Emperor of France, have applied to Spain for recognition, offering to guarantee to her in case of recognition, the possession of Cuba. It is thought in Madrid that, in any case, the Emperor of France will not much longer postpone recognizing the Confederacy. Mr. Lindray, in a letter to the Times, confirms the statements of Mr. Roebuck, respecting their interview with the Emperor of France. On the other hand, Mr. Layard, in the name of the Government, gave again an emphatically denial to the truth of Mr. Roebuck's statements. The Times prefers the concurrent and positive statements of members of the Cabinet to those
North America (search for this): article 11
o Her Majesty's Government. It was announced by the newspapers that dispatch had been taken into consideration by Her Majesty's Government, and answered in terms of courtesy of which I am sure the Emperor of the French had no reason to complain, and never has complained. Lord R. Montague moved as an amendment that this House earnestly desire that the impartial neutrality should continue to be maintained by her Majesty's Government during the present unhappy conless in the States of North America. He yielded to no man in sympathy and admiration for the South, but they were now on the point of working out their independence, and they ought not to be interfered with. He also objected to any intervention. The offer of it was not likely to be acceptable to either side, and, while it could lead to no good, might involve serious difficulties. Mr. Clifford seconded the amendment. The Chancellor of the Exchequers said it was the duty of every responsible adviser of the Crown
United States (United States) (search for this): article 11
t of the week, with reference to this subject, occurred on the evening of the 30th ult., when Mr. Roebuck rose to his motion for the recognition of the Confederate States of America. He spoke advocating the motion, and in his speech gave the following minute account of an interview with the French Emperor on the subject: I wahich, when his recent character and recent speeches were considered, was the same as if he had asked the House to address the Crown and declare war against the United States. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, who was not very warm on the subject, was obliged to charge him with bitter hostility. The honorable gentleman told thehe London News says: Butlier's Correspondence, referring to the statement in the Times that the Emperor had again proposed to England to recognize the Confederate States, asserts that, on the contrary, it is the Cabinet of St. James which has this time taken the initiative of the proposal--It adds that the overture has "not
1 2 3 4 5