hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 30 0 Browse Search
John Wade 26 0 Browse Search
J. R. Anderson 18 0 Browse Search
G. T. Beauregard 16 0 Browse Search
Canada (Canada) 12 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
O. P. Hare 10 0 Browse Search
Green (Kentucky, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
William V. Mott 10 0 Browse Search
Lincoln 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 19, 1861., [Electronic resource].

Found 742 total hits in 309 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
res. If the war is one simply to put down what the London Times has styled an insurrection of Southern planters against their commercial masters in the North, Exeter Hall, of course, feels no interest in such a strife. It must be such's war as Fremont has proclaimed in Missouri to enlist the sympathies of Exeter Hall; but Fremont has been recalled. When we consider the enormous war debt which the Lincoln Government is running up, with no earthly prospect of ever paying the interest upon it,Fremont has been recalled. When we consider the enormous war debt which the Lincoln Government is running up, with no earthly prospect of ever paying the interest upon it, except by obtaining command of the cotton crops of the South, Exeter Hall may well conclude that the public creditors of the United States have not advanced their money upon the theory that an institution which is essential to the cultivation of cotton shall be destroyed. It is therefore idle to suppose that the pseudo philanthropy of Great Britain will be stimulated to any special paroxysm in be half of such a cause; nor if it could, has it ever yet been able to control the policy of England
r to give that active sympathy which it always yields to impracticable and destructive measures. If the war is one simply to put down what the London Times has styled an insurrection of Southern planters against their commercial masters in the North, Exeter Hall, of course, feels no interest in such a strife. It must be such's war as Fremont has proclaimed in Missouri to enlist the sympathies of Exeter Hall; but Fremont has been recalled. When we consider the enormous war debt which the Lincoln Government is running up, with no earthly prospect of ever paying the interest upon it, except by obtaining command of the cotton crops of the South, Exeter Hall may well conclude that the public creditors of the United States have not advanced their money upon the theory that an institution which is essential to the cultivation of cotton shall be destroyed. It is therefore idle to suppose that the pseudo philanthropy of Great Britain will be stimulated to any special paroxysm in be half o
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 1
England's opportunity. --There is not an interest, nor even a passion of Great Britain if Governments can be supposed to be influenced by passions, which is not involved in the present contest in America. If she fails to avail herself of thisial to the cultivation of cotton shall be destroyed. It is therefore idle to suppose that the pseudo philanthropy of Great Britain will be stimulated to any special paroxysm in be half of such a cause; nor if it could, has it ever yet been able to ture of five hundred millions a year for a series of years, the same Golconda would be purchased even more cheaply by Great Britain if the North should confiscate every dollar of her property within her borders. But the North would never venture on of confiscation should go forth. Northing is more absurd than the gasconading threats of the Northern press against Great Britain. What could the United States do in the event of a war with that country ? Privateering she has herself denounced as
Canada (Canada) (search for this): article 1
mfort" to the South, are the abolition sentiments of Exeter Hall, the fear that Canada may be invaded, and, what the North has threatened, that five hundred millions int affecting her commercial interests and national power. The security of Canada is of course a subject which no British ministry could overlook and doubtless ae United States, and have been constantly increasing in wealth and importance. Canada, in proportion to her population, is a more profitable customer of England thanroads, canals, and bridges, which are intended to develop the vast resources of Canada, and to enable her to compete in trade and prosperity with her republican neighbor. The Canadian people, always among the most loyal of British colonists, have become more than ever attached to their institutions since the disruption of the Amehe profligate and shameless journals of New York. We must give her time to put Canada in a state of defence before she assumes a position that must bring her in dire
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 1
, shillings, and pence are concerned. Moreover, it is not sufficiently assured of the purposes of the Federal Government in this war to give that active sympathy which it always yields to impracticable and destructive measures. If the war is one simply to put down what the London Times has styled an insurrection of Southern planters against their commercial masters in the North, Exeter Hall, of course, feels no interest in such a strife. It must be such's war as Fremont has proclaimed in Missouri to enlist the sympathies of Exeter Hall; but Fremont has been recalled. When we consider the enormous war debt which the Lincoln Government is running up, with no earthly prospect of ever paying the interest upon it, except by obtaining command of the cotton crops of the South, Exeter Hall may well conclude that the public creditors of the United States have not advanced their money upon the theory that an institution which is essential to the cultivation of cotton shall be destroyed. It
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
dical principles, which, with every year of the progress of the United States, must continue to grow until it gradually undermines existing i Exeter Hall may well conclude that the public creditors of the United States have not advanced their money upon the theory that an institutithis continent are nearly as great as the territory of the late United States, and have been constantly increasing in wealth and importance. r population, is a more profitable customer of England than the United States, and large amounts of British capital have been invested in pubts of the Northern press against Great Britain. What could the United States do in the event of a war with that country ? Privateering she h the results of another conflict with that gigantic power. The United States went to war with England when England was at war with all the rway, she will not be deterred by apprehension of any damage the United States can inflict upon her from opening the Southern ports without ce
up and caught hold of Wade. Dr. Jackson, the attending surgeon, gave a description of the wounds, which were indicted with shot; so numerously and deeply seated that he made no effort to extract them. There was no danger of a fatal result unless the patient was imprudent. Robert Allen testified that on Saturday evening, October 5th, Wade came to his house and borrowed the gun which has been produced in court. He had often borrowed it of him, and he thought nothing strange of the circumstance. Wade was very drunk that evening. He was his neighbor, and witness had regarded him as a peaceable, quiet man. Both Jones and Mott denied that they ever had any previous difficulty with the prisoner. The Mayor said that if Wade intended to shoot one man and hit another, it constituted a felony; and he thought the evidence proved that his purpose was to shoot Wm. Jones. The prisoner was thereupon remanded, to be further examined before the Hustings Court in November next.
Wilkinson (search for this): article 1
ng to shoot somebody; again went ever to the house, and, on returning, saw Wade raise the rifle, and witness called out "look out, Jones." Wade then fired, and shot him (Mott) in the left arm. There had never been any difficulty between Wade and himself, and he had never heard his peaceable disposition questioned. Other witnesses testified to substantially the same facts, the inference being that Mott was mistaken for another person, or that he received the shot aimed at another. Captain Wilkinson, of the night watch, deposed that he saw Wade, previous to the shooting, standing near the north end of the vegetable market, armed with a gun, and asked what he was doing there. Wade replied that he was just waiting for the boys to come out, and witness thought nothing of the affair, until some one shouted "Captain, that man is going to shoot," and he replied, "seize him, then" The gun then went off, and Jones rushed up and caught hold of Wade. Dr. Jackson, the attending surgeon
Felonious shooting. --John Wade, charged with shooting and wounding William V. Mott, on the 5th of October, was arraigned before the Mayor yesterday, and the examination proceeded. William V. Mott testified that on the evening of that day, about 7 o'clock, after closing his stall in the First Market, he went over to the establishment kept by Brown, Peasley & Co. for the purpose of buying some oysters. He afterwards went into the adjoining house, where he saw Wm. Peasley and Wm. Jones, who were talking about Wade. The conversation related to the winning of some money from Wade, who was said to be angry about it, but the witness did not pay particular attention to the remarks. On going back to the market, he saw Wade, armed with a rifle, looking towards Peasley's house. He remarked to a companion that he thought he was going to shoot somebody; again went ever to the house, and, on returning, saw Wade raise the rifle, and witness called out "look out, Jones." Wade then fired,
Robert Allen (search for this): article 1
ting for the boys to come out, and witness thought nothing of the affair, until some one shouted "Captain, that man is going to shoot," and he replied, "seize him, then" The gun then went off, and Jones rushed up and caught hold of Wade. Dr. Jackson, the attending surgeon, gave a description of the wounds, which were indicted with shot; so numerously and deeply seated that he made no effort to extract them. There was no danger of a fatal result unless the patient was imprudent. Robert Allen testified that on Saturday evening, October 5th, Wade came to his house and borrowed the gun which has been produced in court. He had often borrowed it of him, and he thought nothing strange of the circumstance. Wade was very drunk that evening. He was his neighbor, and witness had regarded him as a peaceable, quiet man. Both Jones and Mott denied that they ever had any previous difficulty with the prisoner. The Mayor said that if Wade intended to shoot one man and hit anothe
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...