previous next

[526] Διὸς Γόνον: i.e. a hero such as Heracles; for “ἄνδρα” Baumeister compares the Homeric “ἡμιθέων γένος ἀνδρῶν”. The correction “Διὸς γόνου” misses the point: “θεὸν” and “ἄνδρα Διὸς γόνον” are subdivisions of “ἀθάνατοι”.

A lacuna is here clearly indicated: the transition from indirect to direct narration is not warranted by Il. 4.303, Ψ” 855; Longinus de sublim. defends such transitions in an interesting chapter (xxvii), but his Homeric example Il. 15.348 can be otherwise explained. Moreover, “ἐκ” has no reference, “τέλειον” seems unnatural with “σύμβολον”, and “σε” is indispensable. Since the sanction of Zeus appears necessary both here and in 568f., and is stated in 575 “χάριν δ᾽ ἐπέθηκε Κρονίων”, perhaps a line has fallen out such as “αἰετὸν ἧκε πατήρ: δ᾽ ἐπώμοσεν, σε μάλ᾽ οἶον” (J. H. S. xvii. p. 266). Possibly the missing passage was longer, containing a reference to the exchange of the pipe, and a direct request by Hermes for “μαντεία”. This view, however, is unnecessary; see further on 533.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: