previous next

PART 6

Let us speak then, in the first place, of Genesis, which, as we have said, results from alteration together with shaping.

The seed having been cast into the womb or into the earth (for there is no difference),1 then, after a certain definite period, a great number of parts become constituted in the substance which is being generated; these differ as regards moisture, dryness, coldness and warmth,2 and in all the other qualities [p. 21]which naturally derive therefrom.3 These derivative qualities, you are acquainted with, if you have given any sort of scientific consideration to the question of genesis and destruction. For, first and foremost after the qualities mentioned come the other so-called tangible distinctions, and after them those which appeal to taste, smell, and sight. Now, tangible distinctions are hardness and softness, viscosity, friability, lightness, heaviness, density, rarity, smoothness, roughness, thickness and thinness; all of these have been duly mentioned by Aristotle.4 And of course you know those which appeal to taste, smell, and sight. Therefore, if you wish to know which alterative faculties are primary and elementary, they are moisture, dryness, coldness, and warmth, and if you wish to know which ones arise from the combination of these, they will be found to be in each animal of a number corresponding to its sensible elements. The name sensible elements is given to all the homogeneous5 parts of the body, and these are to be detected not by any system, but by personal observation of dissections.6

Now Nature constructs bone, cartilage, nerve, membrane, ligament, vein, and so forth, at the first stage of the animal's genesis7, employing at this task a faculty which is, in general terms, generative and alterative, and, in more detail, warming, chilling, drying, or moistening; or such as spring from the [p. 23]blending of these, for example, the bone-producing, nerve-producing, and cartilage-producing faculties8 (since for the sake of clearness these names must be used as well).

Now the peculiar9 flesh of the liver is of this kind as well, also that of the spleen, that of the kidneys, that of the lungs, and that of the heart; so also the proper substance of the brain, stomach, gullet, intestines, and uterus is a sensible element, of similar parts all through, simple, and uncompounded. That is to say, if you remove from each of the organs mentioned its arteries, veins, and nerves,10 the substance remaining in each organ is, from the point of view of the senses, simple and elementary. As regards those organs consisting of two dissimilar coats11, of which each is simple, of these organs the coats are the are the elements- for example, the coats of the stomach, oesophagus, intestines, and arteries; each of these two coats has an alterative faculty peculiar to it, which has engendered it from the menstrual blood of the mother. Thus the special alterative faculties in each animal are of the same number as the elementary parts12; and further, the activities must necessarily correspond each to one of the special parts, just as each part has its special use- for example, those ducts which extend from the kidneys into the bladder, and which are called ureters; for these are not arteries, since they do not pulsate nor do they consist of two coats; and they [p. 25]are not veins, since they neither contain blood, nor do their coats in any way resemble those of veins; from nerves they differ still more than from the structures mentioned.

"What, then, are they?" someone asks- as though every part must necessarily be either an artery, a vein, a nerve, or a complex of these,13 and as though the truth were not what I am now stating, namely, that every one of the various organs has its own particular substance. For in fact the two bladders- that which receives the urine, and that which receives the yellow bile- not only differ from all other organs, but also from one another. Further, the ducts which spring out like kinds of conduits from the gall-bladder and which pass into the liver have no resemblance either to arteries, veins or nerves. But these parts have been treated at a greater length in my work "On the Anatomy of Hippocrates," as well as elsewhere.

As for the actual substance of the coats of the stomach, intestine, and uterus, each of these has been rendered what it is by a special alterative faculty of Nature; while the bringing of these together,14 the therewith of the structures which are inserted into them, the outgrowth into the intestine,15 the shape of the inner cavities, and the like, have all been determined by a faculty which we call the shaping or formative faculty16; this faculty we also state to be artistic- nay, the best and highest art- doing everything for some purpose, so that [p. 27]there is nothing ineffective or superfluous, or capable of being better disposed. This, however, I shall demonstrate in my work "On the Use of Parts."

1 Note inadequate analogy of semen with fertilised seeds of plants (i.e. of gamete with zygote). Strictly speaking, of course, semen corresponds to pollen. cf. p. 130, note 2.

2 ie.the four primary qualities; cf. chap. iii. supra

3 Various secondary or derivative differences in the tissues. Note pre-eminence of sense of touch.

4 De Anima, ii. et seq.

5 Lit. homoeomerous=of similar parts throughout, "the same all through." He refers to the elementary tissues, conceived as not being susceptible of further analysis.

6 That is, by the bodily eye, and not by the mind's eye. The observer is here called an autoptes or "eye-witness." Our medical term autopsy thus means literally a persona inspection of internal parts, ordinarily hidden.

7 i.e. "alteration" is the earlier of the two stages which constitute embryogeny or "genesis." cf. p. 18, note 1.

8 The terms Galen actually uses are: ostopoietic, neuropoietic, chondropoietic.

9 As we should say, parenchyma (a term used by Erasistratus).

10 These were all the elementary tissues that Aristotle, for example, had recognized; other tissues (e.g. flesh or muscle)he believed to be complexes of these.

11 Or tunics.

12 i.e. issues.

13 As, for example, Aristotle had held ; cf. p. 23, note 3. Galen added many new tissues to those described by Aristotle.

14 Lit. snythesis.

15 By this is meant the duodenum, considered as an outgrowth or prolongation of the stomach towards the intestines.

16 cf. p. 19, note 2.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Greek (A.J. Brock, 1916)
hide References (5 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: