16.
If then he did not choose to slay him, when he might have done so with the
gratitude of everyone, is it likely that he should have chosen to do so when
some people were sure to complain of it? If he did not venture to do it when
he might have done so lawfully, when he had both place and time in his
favour, when he might have done so with impunity can we believe that he did
not hesitate to slay him unjustly at a time and place which supplied him
with no excuse for the deed, when it was at the hazard of his life?
[42]
especially, O judges, when the day of
contest for the greatest distinction of the state, and the day of the
comitia, was at hand. At which time, (for I
know what a nervous thing ambition is, how vehement and how anxious is the
desire for the consulship,) we are afraid of everything, not only of those
things which can be openly found fault with, but even of whatever can be
secretly thought; we shudder at every rumour, at every idle and empty story;
we look anxiously at every one's countenance, at every one's eye. For there
is nothing so soft, so tender, so frail, so flexible, as the inclinations
and feelings of our fellow-citizens towards us; for they are not only angry
at any impropriety in the conduct of candidates, but they often even take a
disgust at our virtuous actions.
[43]
Did Milo then, keeping in view this long hoped-for and wished-for day of the
Campus Martius, propose to himself to come to those venerable auspices of the centuries with bloody hands, owning
and confessing a wickedness and a crime? How perfectly incredible is such
conduct in such a man! At the same time how undoubted is it in the case of
Clodius, who thought that he should be a king as soon as Milo was slain.
What shall I say more? This is the very mainspring of audacity, O judges,
for who is there who does not know that the greatest temptation of all to do
wrong is the hope of impiety? Now in which of the two did this exist? In
Milo? who is even now on his trial for an action which I contend was an
illustrious one, but which was at all events a necessary one, or in Clodius,
who had shown such contempt for court's of justice and punishment that he
took no pleasure in anything which was not either impious, from its
disregard of the prohibitions of nature, or illegal, from its violation of
law.
[44]
But what am I arguing about? why do I keep on disputing at greater length? I
appeal to you, O Quintus Petillius, a most virtuous and fearless citizen; I
call you to witness, O Marcus Cato; whom some heavenly interposition has
given me for judges. You have heard from Marcus Favonius, and you heard it
too while Clodius was alive, that he, Clodius, had said to him that Milo
would die within three days,—and on the third day the deed which
he had mentioned was put in execution. When he did not hesitate to reveal
what he was thinking of, can you have any doubt what he did?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.