§§ 1—3. Stephanus has made a long reply to my former speech, and, as I suspected, has had a good deal to say in defence of his evidence. A cunning rogue himself, and well primed by Phormion's numerous advisers, he has attempted to mislead you into the notion that he is not responsible for all the details of his deposition. He has not brought a single witness to prove, either (1) that he was present when my father made the alleged will, or (2) that he ever saw it opened after my father's death; and yet he has actually deposed that the copy set forth in his deposition is a transcript of the ‘will.’ By so doing he is palpably convicted of having given false testimony.

παράγωνὑπενόουν Apollodorus had already, in his former speech, thrown out his suspicions that Stephanus would have recourse to this line of defence. See Or. 45 §§ 44 and 87.

οἱ γράφοντες...ὑπὲρ Φορμίωνος e.g. Demosthenes himself.

την ἀπολογίαν ..μελετᾶν ‘prepared their defence.’ μελετᾶν, like meditari, with which it is etymologically connected, is often used of ‘rehearsing a part,’ ‘conning over a task,’ ‘practising for a performance.’

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: