previous next


The independence of the Confederate States a fact accomplished.

[From the London Herald.] That man must be endowed with an almost American credulity who continues to doubt that the independence of the Confederate States is an accomplished reality. If, at the outset, Mr. Seward himself had been asked how long he demanded for the accomplishment of the enterprise his Government had undertaken, he would certainly have been satisfied with a single year; and would have been content to allow that, if at the end of that period the Confederates could still keep the field in Virginia, the European Powers would be entitled to recognize their independence. Three years have almost elapsed since the first defeat of the Federals, and during the whole of that time the Confederates have fought, not as Spain fought against France during the uneasy reign of Joseph Bonaparte, not as the Spanish colonies fought against Spain, not even as our own American colonies fought against the armies of George III., but as Russia fought Napoleon in 1815, or as Frederick II. defended himself against Austria in the Seven Years War. The war has been waged for the most part on Southern soil; it has, so far, not been a war on equal terms: that the one party has fought for empire and the other only for independence. But it has in no way partaken of the character of an insurrectionary, as distinguished from an international, war. The Confederate Government has, from first to last, held a position of perfect equality with that of the Northern States. It has administered, with undisputed authority, the affairs of its own country; and the Federal Government has been unable to exercise any other than a military power there, and that only within the territory covered by its own armies.

The State Governments have gone on as regularly as ever; the administration of the civil law is as perfect in the South as in any European country; and while in the Northern States the necessities of an aggressive war have been held to require the exercise of a military authority superior to the law, the civil authorities have never been overridden by martial law in any Southern district not actually invaded or threatened by the enemy.

To deny such a government the status of independence accorded to Nicaragua, or to Greece, certainly seems the height of absurdity; and this impression is not weakened when we look to the military operations that have taken place. It is true that at sea the Federals have been able to maintain a decided superiority, and that a blockade, efficient enough to impose very serious difficulties in the way of the export of any bulky commodities, has been maintained at every port which has at once so good a harbor and such means of communication with the interior as to be available for commercial purposes; but it is also true that the Federals have hardly gained a single naval success, and have sustained several naval disasters.

It is true, also, that they have been able to occupy several points on the vast extent of Southern coast which are commanded from the sea, and to obtain the control of a considerable portion of the inland waters of the South. They have also penetrated at various points the long and indefensible frontier line, and pushed their armies far into Southern territory. But they have not been able to conquer a single State; and the chief fruit of three years of warfare, beside the disputed possession of Tennessee, is a wide-spread devastation and a considerable havoc among the laboring population of the South. Hundreds of homes and farms have been destroyed, and thousands of negroes stolen, of whom the majority have been burnt; two or three which lie at the mercy of gunboats have been occupied; and this is all that has been achieved.

The Southern armies have sustained no great disaster in the field; they have inflicted half a score of the most terrible defeats recorded in history. Their capital, with a sort of bravado, was planted near their most endangered frontier; army after army, to the number of several hundred thousands, has been hurled against it and completely shattered; a quarter of a million of corpses are manuring the plains of Virginia — and with this result, that Richmond is now stronger than it ever was, and very much safer than Washington, and that, instead of asking whether Grant can take the city, men, both North and South, are expecting to hear that Lee has taken Grant's camp, and that a third of the invading army has been left in the hands of the victors. Sherman has followed up the long and costly march which last year had brought the Federal army of the West to Chattanooga; he is not so very far from Atlanta; but while no one fears for Atlanta, all the friends of the North tremble for Sherman and his army. --Charleston has been attacked in vain; and after crushing repulses, the Federal besiegers are driven to amuse themselves by a bombardment which, though it succeed in killing now and then an innocent child, or murdering a bride at the altar, might be continued for a hundred years without bringing the city any nearer to a surrender.

* * * * * * * *

Under these circumstances, it seems perfectly absurd that the policy of European Powers should be influenced by an affectation so palpable as that of uncertainty as to the issue of the war. No sober politician considers that the independence of the South has yet to be achieved; it is only in diplomatic dispatches that statesmen speak of the Confederate States as a merely inchoate nationality; but, unhappily, it is by diplomatic language, and not by expressions of personal opinion, that Europe can influence the feelings or the conduct of America. If Lord Russell could speak to the Confederate Government as every one speaks of it, he would secure for England a warm and faithful ally, whose friendship would do more than an army of fifty thousand men to protect the frontier of Canada. If England and France would speak through their Governments the opinion of their people — if they would accord to the Government of Richmond that recognition which it has received from the public opinion of Europe — they would do very much to bring the war to a close, and spare the lives of tens of thousands who must otherwise perish before the North will consent to confess itself beaten. The ill-will of the North toward this country is already so bitter that we can hardly exasperate it.

The United States would go to war with us now if they dared; they will not be the more likely to dare it if we prove our contempt of their menaces by recognizing the South. On the other hand, if we wait to recognize the Confederates till we cannot help it, we shall have no claim on their friendship, and no right to their assistance when the North does find the courage to quarrel with us. Recognition, then, so far from tending to precipitate war, is the best possible guarantee for permanent peace between ourselves and the United States; and if either Parliament or the Administration were capable of a courageous and far-sighted policy, Mr. Lindsay's motion might have a chance of being carried, and of rendering material service to the country and to mankind. But to submit such a motion to a house which has just approved Lord Russell's betrayal of Denmark, and in which the authors of our Polish and American policy have an obedient majority of eighteen, is simply to invite defeat, to give an advantage to the Northern faction in Parliament, and to counteract, by an adverse parliamentary vote, whatever effect may be produced by the manifestation of English feeling out of doors in sympathy with the South, and in confident expectation of her complete and speedy triumph.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
United States (United States) (5)
France (France) (2)
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) (2)
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (1)
Russia (Russia) (1)
Nicaragua (Nicaragua) (1)
Denmark (Denmark) (1)
Canada (Canada) (1)
Austria (Austria) (1)
hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Sherman (2)
Grant (2)
William H. Seward (1)
Napoleon (1)
Lindsay (1)
Lee (1)
Joseph Bonaparte (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
1815 AD (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: