hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 4. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 406 4 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume II. 294 0 Browse Search
The Photographic History of The Civil War: in ten volumes, Thousands of Scenes Photographed 1861-65, with Text by many Special Authorities, Volume 2: Two Years of Grim War. (ed. Francis Trevelyan Miller) 226 2 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 214 0 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 3. 182 4 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 6. (ed. Frank Moore) 148 0 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 118 0 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War: Volume 2. 113 3 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore) 109 3 Browse Search
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington 41 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington. You can also browse the collection for William S. Rosecrans or search for William S. Rosecrans in all documents.

Your search returned 21 results in 4 document sections:

William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington, Chapter 8: Corps organizations. (search)
ordered to Tennessee as a reinforcement for Rosecrans. The two corps were placed under command ofgnated as the Fourteenth Corps, and that General Rosecrans be placed in command. These forces had sion became necessary. On November 7th, General Rosecrans ordered that the corps be divided into tof the centre divisions were detached by General Rosecrans to protect his line of communications, a Thomas. After the battle of Stone's River, Rosecrans advanced his army to Murfreesboro, and encamd was reorganized. General Thomas succeeded Rosecrans, and Major-General John M. Palmer was placede's River, 13,779 present for duty. After Rosecrans' victory at Stone's River, the Twentieth Corand 1 missing; total, 274. It accompanied Rosecrans across the Cumberland Mountains in his pursuamauga. On the 7th of November, 1862, General Rosecrans divided the Army of the Cumberland--thenr this battle the enemy fell back, whereupon Rosecrans' Army occupied Murfreesboro, remaining encam
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington, chapter 10 (search)
(R. B.) Brigade — Duval's Division--Eighth Corps. （1) Col. Wm. S. Rosecrans, W. P., R. A.; Bvt. Major-Gen. U. S. A. （3) Col. Rutherfordce during the spring and summer of 1863, after which it joined in Rosecrans's advance to Chickamauga, having been assigned to Steedman's Divit remained at Murfreesboro until June, 1863, when it marched with Rosecrans on his advance to Chattanooga and successful occupation of that p of arduous campaigns and long marches, ending, with the year, in Rosecrans's hard-fought battle of Stone's River. The regiment was then in ere, September 18th, for Iuka, where it fought the next day under Rosecrans. It was then in Sanborn's (1st) Brigade of Hamilton's Division, ed, and 1 missing; among the killed were five line officers. General Rosecrans said officially, that the glorious Fifth Iowa bore the thricelantry of the Eleventh at Iuka, elicited special mention from General Rosecrans in G. O. No. 130, in which he calls attention to the magnific<
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington, Chapter 11: list of battles, with the regiments sustaining the greatest losses in each. (search)
  June 10, 1861.             5th New York Pierce's ---------- 6 13 -- 19 Rich Mountain, W. Va.             July 11, 1861.             13th Indiana Rosecrans's ---------- 8 9 -- 17 Blackburn's Ford, Va.             July 18, 1861.             1st Massachusetts Tyler's ---------- 10 8 14 32 12th New York Tyli Lyon's ---------- 76 208 11 295 1st Kansas Lyon's ---------- 77 187 20 284 Carn Fex Ferry, W. Va.             Sept. 10, 1861.             10th Ohio Rosecrans' ---------- 9 50 -- 59 Ball's Bluff, Va.             Oct. 21, 1861.             15th Massachusetts Baker's ---------- 14 61 227 302 20th Massachusett Tribune. of whom 54 were gunners, or helped serve the guns; most of the others were drivers. Of the 54 men at the guns, 46 were killed or wounded at Iuka. General Rosecrans says, in his official report of this affair, that Sands's Eleventh Ohio Battery, under command of Lieutenant
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington, List of regiments in the Union Armies, with total number of deaths in each. (search)
36th Ohio 364 70th Ohio 332 27th Ohio 437 38th Ohio 360 74th Ohio 321 43d Ohio 436 2d Ohio Cavalry 358 49th Ohio 314 53d Ohio 380 69th Ohio 348 71st Ohio 313 In some of these regiments nearly every effective man reenlisted, and these reenlistments, together with the recruits, enabled many of the veteran regiments to preserve their organizations through the war. Of the distinguished generals in the Union Armies, a remarkably large number came from Ohio. Generals Sheridan, Rosecrans, Sherman, Griffin, Hunt, McPherson, Mitchel, Gillmore, McDowell, Custer, Weitzel, Kautz, William S. Smith, Crook, Stanley, Brooks, Leggett, the McCooks, Fuller, Steedman, Force, Banning, Ewing, Cox, Willich, Chas. R. Woods, Lytle, Garrard, Van Derveer, Beatty, Tyler, Harker, Opdycke, Carroll, and other noted officers, were born in Ohio, and appointed from that State, either to West Point or to some volunteer command. General McClellan's first service in the war was as the Major-General of