hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
French Forrest 25 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
C. L. Vallandigham 18 0 Browse Search
Thomas J. Jackson 14 2 Browse Search
Privates Adams 12 0 Browse Search
Hooker 11 3 Browse Search
George B. McClellan 10 0 Browse Search
Barksdale 9 1 Browse Search
France (France) 8 0 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: May 13, 1863., [Electronic resource].

Found 518 total hits in 279 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ...
Newdegate (search for this): article 13
would be most improper and dangerous, considering the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely
H. Cairns (search for this): article 13
ough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in the mails, and in compliance the Government had relieved them of the obligation. Sir H. Cairns asked if it was to be understood that vessels carrying mails to a neutral port were regarded as liable to seizure on account of the correspondence in the mails? If that principle was to be laid down the mail packet between Dever and Calais was liable to be seized by an American cruiser. Mr. Malins, in common with all English men, was humiliated at the unaccountable timidity of Government in not making the rights of English merchants respecting, and in protecting English vessels in
Malins (search for this): article 13
ation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in the mails, and in compliance the Government had relieved them of the obligation. Sir H. Cairns asked if it was to be understood that vessels carrying mails to a neutral port were regarded as liable to seizure on account of the correspondence in the mails? If that principle was to be laid down the mail packet between Dever and Calais was liable to be seized by an American cruiser. Mr. Malins, in common with all English men, was humiliated at the unaccountable timidity of Government in not making the rights of English merchants respecting, and in protecting English vessels in, their legitimate trade. The mail question. In the House of Lords, on the 24th, Lord Ridesdale referred to Mr. Seward's instructions to the naval officers of the United States cruisers, directing that the mails should not be opened when seized on board any ship, but should be either given up to t
Sheffield (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 13
his conduct ought not to be passed over tacitly, but called for a strong expression of opinion from Government. Mr. R. Crawford said that at the proper time lie he was prepared to go into the case of the Peterhoff; but after the speech of the noble Lord at the head of the Government, it would be most improper and dangerous, considering the character of the subject, to continue the debate on the present occasion. He must express his regret for the language of the honorable member from Sheffield. Mr. Peacock said it was very inconvenient to discuss a question of such importance without having more authentic information than a newspaper correspondence. He therefore moved an amendment for the production of all the official correspondence relating to the matter. Mr. Newdegate denounced Mr. Roebuck's language. Mr. Layard deprecated a continuance of the discussion, and hoped that the House had confidence enough in the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With
United States (United States) (search for this): article 13
f Commons, on the — thault., Mr. Roebuck said he wished to ask a question of great importance. [Hear, hear] He alluded to the proceedings of an Admiral in the United States service, with respect to an English merchant ship going from an English port to a neutral port. [Hear, hear,] He wished to preface his question with one or twIt appears that the question of which I have given notice creates a great sensation among them. [Hear, hear.] Well, sir, the conduct of the North American dis-United States has been such as is humiliating to the people of England. [Cheers.] The noble lord has shown himself hitherto a friend of the honor, the dignity and the prosptimate trade. The mail question. In the House of Lords, on the 24th, Lord Ridesdale referred to Mr. Seward's instructions to the naval officers of the United States cruisers, directing that the mails should not be opened when seized on board any ship, but should be either given up to the Consul of the nation to which the v
France (France) (search for this): article 13
h merchant in his honorable trade have been utterly destroyed by the conduct of the American Government. I say that conduct of the American Government you ought to resent. [Cheers.] But not only was this done.--There were persons calling themselves English merchants, who applied to the American Minister for a permit to allow their ships to proceed in safety to its destination. That permit is granted, and why? Because that ship carried out arms to the Mexicans to be used against our ally, France. --[Cheers.] Since then, other men calling themselves English merchants have applied to the same authority for the same permit. They have been refused because they are Englishmen, and because they are not carrying out arms to aid the Mexicans in the war, though they were trading to the same port. [Cheers.] The permit, I repeat, was refused, and now I must say that Mr. Adams, the American Minister, is the Minister for commerce in England. [Loud cheers.] Sir, I would put it to the noble Lor
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 13
at present to state at what result. Her Majesty's Government might arrive. Mr. G. P. Bentinck, at some length, called attention to the correspondence in the Times with respect to the seizure of the Peterhoff, the conveyance of the mails to Mexico, and the conduct of the American Minister in granting permits for the conveyance of arms for the use of the Mexicans against the French. This conduct ought not to be passed over tacitly, but called for a strong expression of opinion from Governm the Government to leave the matter in their hands. With regard to the conveyance of the mails the question had not been fairly represented to the merchants, who had requested that a mail agent should be placed on board vessels carrying mails to Mexico, or that they should be relieved of the obligation of carrying them lest they should be likely to be seized from having hostile correspondence in the mails, and in compliance the Government had relieved them of the obligation. Sir H. Cairns
Burnside (search for this): article 14
General Hooker's evidence before the Congressional committee on the conduct of the war, with reference to McClellan and Burnside's campaigns, says: So far as Gen. McClellan is concerned, if he had any reputation left this evidence would annihi2 o'clock Monday night with a company of the Thirteenth United States infantry, sixty-seven men, with directions from Gen. Burnside, commanding the Department of the Ohio, to arrest C. L. Vallandigham at his residence in Dayton. The train reached Drison on Columbia street, between Sycamore and Broadway, where no one was permitted to see him without an order from General Burnside. The official charges against Vallandigham set forth that on or about the first of May, at Mount Vernon, Ohio, were rejected the day before the battle of Fredericksburg. He is also charged with having said that order No. 38 of General Burnside was a base usurpation of arbitrary authority, and that the sooner the people informed the minions of usurped power t
Dickens (search for this): article 14
now open before him will anticipate the display of that courage and genius which will lead the Army of the Potomac to victory and to Richmond. A Yankee picture of Washington. The Washington Chronicle gives a picture of Washington "under Northern rule," which of course is as flattering as possible. It says: A stranger standing to-day at the Capitol, and looking toward the President's House, would see nothing, save perhaps the unfinished Washington Monument, to remind him of Dickens's pleasantry. On the contrary, he would see a broad and sightly avenue, thronged with persons and vehicles, flanked by structures, many of which would do credit to any city. No longer a seedy, misnamed metropolis, Washington begins to wear the aspect of a thriving and prosperous city. Oyster cellars and gambling shops and unlimited dust are not now its chief features, as in bygone years.--The opera, first-class theatrical entertainments, and legitimate trade are in vogue. Under the insp
May 1st (search for this): article 14
in, which was in waiting. Some of Vallandigham's friends, hearing what was going on, rung the fire bells with the intention of gathering a crowd to attempt a rescue. But few persons appeared, and they gave no trouble. Vallandigham was brought to the city and lodged in the prison on Columbia street, between Sycamore and Broadway, where no one was permitted to see him without an order from General Burnside. The official charges against Vallandigham set forth that on or about the first of May, at Mount Vernon, Ohio, he publicity addressed a large meeting of citizens, declaring that the present war is an injurious, cruel, and unnecessary war — a war not being waged for the preservation of the Union, but for the purpose of crushing out liberty and establishing a despotism — a war for the freedom of the blacks and the enslaving of the whites; and that, if the Administration had so wished, the war could have been honorably terminated; that peace might have been honorably obtained
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ...