hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Robert E. Dixon 52 0 Browse Search
Goodrich 33 1 Browse Search
Dixon, Ill. (Illinois, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
R. E. Lee 11 1 Browse Search
Gen Grant 10 0 Browse Search
France (France) 8 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Moses L. Stratton 7 1 Browse Search
Robert S. Forde 6 0 Browse Search
Forney 6 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: June 11, 1863., [Electronic resource].

Found 526 total hits in 276 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
June, 4 AD (search for this): article 1
in three months more they are declared not fundable at any rate. The summary degradation of a currency such as this is a sample of the operation of the plan. That it will occasion loss to "innocent" holders, and throw profit into the hands of speculators, is certain; that it will impair somewhat the credit of the general currency of the Government, by disturbing public confidence, may be feared. The system, however, is to be extended to subsequent issues. The notes issued since the 6th April and hereafter to be issued, are to be allowed to be funded within a year from the date of their emission, at six per cent.; after the end of that year they are only fundable at four per cent. Now, if there is a want of disposition to fund these notes, is the funding to be stimulated by a refusal of the banks to take them on deposit, (as in the case of the eight per cents.,) and thus practically to make them uncurrent? The Government having set out with the promise of eight per cent., and
December 1st, 1862 AD (search for this): article 2
Action of the Banks. We are glad to see that the Banks of Lynchburg and Petersburg have determined to receive on deposit and pay out all the notes of the Confederate Government, whether issued before or since the 1st of December, 1862. The Banks here took the contrary course of cooperating with the Government in the very questionable (mild term!) measure of interdicting a part of its own issues. The expedient is about to produce an amount of inconvenience to the public that the Banks in Lynchburg and Petersburg thought too serious to be allowed, so far as they are concerned; and they did right not to be a party to it. Not only will the effect of the measure be seriously to incommode the public, but very probably to impair the value of the Confederate money still further in public estimation. The money put under the ban is in all the country — in the hands of the people — in the hands of men who have no money to lay up in bonds, and who have no more respect for one of the eight
Chancellorsville (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 3
gestive item of Yankee news has been published in this paper, which states that the Germans of New York have held a meeting and passed resolutions declaring "the continued abuse of the 11th Army corps, composed of Germans, which stampeded at Chancellorsville, to be chiefly attributed to the feeling of Know Nothingism, which prevails to a great extent in both Northern and Southern States." The Germans of the North, like the Irish, are beginning to find out that, at the bottom of their heartso use them for their own base purposes, and would have no hesitation in making them and other foreigners the victims of their intolerance and bigotry if the South were only out of their way. The ridicule heaped upon the retreating Germans at Chancellorsville is a significant indication of the real estimation which they are held in the North. Why is nothing said of the retreating Yankees? Were the Germans the only soldiers whom the resistless charge of our gallant troops drove from the field?
Scott (search for this): article 4
cans. The Washington authorities would like to discredit the reported fall of Puebla, and one of their press dispatches announces that the natural defences of Puebla were so strong that ten thousand men could defend it against four times their number. That depends, we suppose, on who the men are. Ten thousand Mexicans could not hold Puebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior races. With mixed or black blood they readily assimilate. All that is base and degraded finds a natural fusion with Yankeedom — Success to the French! We hope betwe
Puebla (Puebla, Mexico) (search for this): article 4
The French and Mexicans. The Washington authorities would like to discredit the reported fall of Puebla, and one of their press dispatches announces that the natural defences of Puebla were so strong that ten thousand men could defend it against four times their number. That depends, we suppose, on who the men are. Ten thouPuebla were so strong that ten thousand men could defend it against four times their number. That depends, we suppose, on who the men are. Ten thousand Mexicans could not hold Puebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the FrencPuebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior races. With mixed or black blood they readily assimilate. All that is base and degraded finds a natural fusion with Yankeedom — Success to t
United States (United States) (search for this): article 4
hold Puebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior eat alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior races. With mixed or black blood they readily assimilate. All that is base and degraded finds a natural fusion with Yankeedom — Success to the French! We hope between France and the Confederate States the "natural allies" will both be brought to their proper level.
France (France) (search for this): article 4
nd Mexicans could not hold Puebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making alleat alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior races. With mixed or black blood they readily assimilate. All that is base and degraded finds a natural fusion with Yankeedom — Success to the French! We hope between France and the Confederate States the "natural allies" will both be brought to their proper level.
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 4
eir press dispatches announces that the natural defences of Puebla were so strong that ten thousand men could defend it against four times their number. That depends, we suppose, on who the men are. Ten thousand Mexicans could not hold Puebla against forty thousand Frenchmen. At least we may conclude so from the fact that it was taken without difficulty by the Americans, and the army of Gen. Scott was not superior in numbers or prowess to the army of France. The United States look with great alarm upon the progress of the French arms in Mexico. We hope they have some grounds for their apprehensions. They say that the Mexicans are their "natural allies." They have a happy faculty of making allies of all inferior races. With mixed or black blood they readily assimilate. All that is base and degraded finds a natural fusion with Yankeedom — Success to the French! We hope between France and the Confederate States the "natural allies" will both be brought to their proper level.
1863 AD (search for this): article 5
is Nord:" "An ingenious arithmetician has made the following calculations, in virtue of which he proposes to call the year 1863 the year of nines," and concludes with the announcement that "this year is essentially one of revolutions." [Italics my own] Why did this "ingenious arithmetician" wait for the year 1863? For example, if he had gone back to the year 972, he would have found that, subjected to similar tests, (which any of your readers can do,) it would give like results. The truth is that any number, such as "1863," "972," &c., or 2754, (should it ever come.) the sum of whose digits, taken two and two from the right, is divisible by nine, will develop nearly all (if not all) of the peculiarities ascribed so ominously to 1863. all (if not all) of the peculiarities ascribed so ominously to 1863. As I have often seen similar articles going the rounds of the press, by giving this an insertion in your paper you will promote the interests of true science. A Subscriber.
June 2nd, 1863 AD (search for this): article 5
[for the Richmond Dispatch.]the Numerical Combinations. Richmond, June 2, 1863. In your issue of this date you say, "we make the following extract from the Paris Nord:" "An ingenious arithmetician has made the following calculations, in virtue of which he proposes to call the year 1863 the year of nines," and concludes with the announcement that "this year is essentially one of revolutions." [Italics my own] Why did this "ingenious arithmetician" wait for the year 1863? For example, if he had gone back to the year 972, he would have found that, subjected to similar tests, (which any of your readers can do,) it would give like results. The truth is that any number, such as "1863," "972," &c., or 2754, (should it ever come.) the sum of whose digits, taken two and two from the right, is divisible by nine, will develop nearly all (if not all) of the peculiarities ascribed so ominously to 1863. As I have often seen similar articles going the rounds of the press, by giving t
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...