hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
W. L. G. Lib 3,448 0 Browse Search
W. L. Garrison 924 0 Browse Search
William Lloyd Garrison 331 1 Browse Search
Wendell Phillips 252 0 Browse Search
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) 208 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 196 0 Browse Search
Edmund Quincy 195 1 Browse Search
Frederick Douglass 168 0 Browse Search
George Thompson 148 0 Browse Search
John Brown 129 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in Francis Jackson Garrison, William Lloyd Garrison, 1805-1879; the story of his life told by his children: volume 3.

Found 11,602 total hits in 3,409 results.

... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341
Cuba (Cuba) (search for this): chapter 20
in Lib. 30.70. American political history, the battle raged over this point. Both wings of the party were agreed in reaffirming the Cincinnati platform of 1856, in denouncing the Personal Liberty laws of the North, in demanding the annexation of Cuba—which meant simply the revival of the slave trade. Mr. Gaulden, one of the delegates from Georgia, spoke openly (and humorously) on May 1 in favor of this revival, without which, he said, it would be impossible to colonize new slave States exce moral than that of the slavebreeders in Virginia, who trafficked not in the heathen raw product, but in the manufactured article—in civilized and Christian men! (Lib. 30: 77.) At this time the participation of American ships in slave ventures for Cuba and the Southern U. S. seaboard was assuming flagrant proportions (Lib. 30: 83,103, 158, 167), though the Episcopal Convention in New York on Sept. 27 was much scandalized by John Jay's proposing a resolution condemning the trade (Lib. 30.158). Th
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
ther, believes the lies that they call speeches. William Pinkney of Maryland, addressing the U. S. Senate on April 15, 1820, on the admission of Missouri, and repelling the intimation that the slave States did not possess a republican form of government, as guaranteed by the Constitution, asked: Do gentlemen perceive the consequences to which their arguments must lead if they are of any value? Do they reflect that they lead to emancipation in the old United States, or to an exclusion of Delaware, Maryland and all the South, and a great portion of the West, from the Union? . . . They have no disposition to meddle with slavery in the old United States. Perhaps not-but who shall answer for their successors. . . It is the natural office of such a principle to wrestle with slavery wheresoever it finds it ( Library of am. Literature, 4.188). This reasoning was applicable to the Republicans in 1860: the sentiment which was hostile to the extension of slavery into the Territories, could n
Georgia (Georgia, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
63, 167, 178, 179, 181, 183, 185. disruption, had brought about a white exodus—when even, as in Georgia, Northerners coming by sea were Lib. 30.187, 191. kept from landing. Mr. Garrison, himself st excuse for spontaneous heat over such trifles, any more than over a slave-burning like that in Georgia in October, Lib. 30.171. or over the perennial fear of slave risings, such as infected Lib. 2d already been said during the current session. Two examples will suffice. Senator Iverson of Georgia Lib. 30.17. was ready to lead away the Southern delegation on the mere election of John Shermaba—which meant simply the revival of the slave trade. Mr. Gaulden, one of the delegates from Georgia, spoke openly (and humorously) on May 1 in favor of this revival, without which, he said, it woarticles of merchandise, under the name of persons ... The delegates from South Carolina and Georgia distinctly avowed that, without this guarantee of protection to their property in slaves, they
Illinois (Illinois, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
the District of Columbia, no allusion. In the vote for candidates, to the infinite surprise of the Eastern States, to the grief even of many abolitionists, the prize of leadership was denied to William H. Seward and given to Abraham Lincoln of Illinois. On the 18th of June, the dismembered Democratic Lib. 30.102. Convention, attended and watched, without participation, by the cotton-State delegates, met at Baltimore and nominated Stephen A. Douglas for President. A secession followed, andfrom the adjoining States of Maryland and Virginia, and from the whole seaboard. Singling out this provision, Mr. Phillips published in the Liberator of June Lib. 30.99. 22, 1860, a stinging article, headed, Abraham Lincoln, the Slave-hound of Illinois, and beginning: We gibbet a Northern hound to-day, side by side with the infamous Mason of Virginia. Mr. Garrison very reluctantly J. M. Mason. admitted both the caption and the text (of the justice of which he had no means of forming an opini
Indiana (Indiana, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
his hotel! In the same city, Mayor John Wentworth having helped pay the fine of men Lib. 30.165, 177. imprisoned for aiding a fugitive to escape, and presided at a public deliverance meeting, The party is crushed! Lib. 30.177. was heard from the audience; Lincoln is defeated! Long John is playing thunder with us! Long John has gone over to Douglas! The Higher Power at the helm of affairs paid no attention to such trivialities. The October State elections in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana, following those in New Lib. 30.163, 147. England, clearly foreshadowed the result of the national contest. Will the South be so obliging as to secede from the Union? Lib. 30.163. asked Mr. Garrison. And, I salute your Convention with hope and joy, he wrote to his Lib. 30.175. friend Johnston in Vermont, on October 15. All the omens are with us. Forward! N. R. Johnston. On the sixth of November, Lincoln was elected by the vote of every Northern Lib. 30.178. State save one; and that a
Kansas (Kansas, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
very. The lamentable tragedy at Harper's Ferry is clearly traceable to the unjustifiable attempt to force slavery into Kansas by a repeal of the Missouri Compromise. So thought and wrote, to a New York meeting of Dec. 16, 1859; Lib. 29.205. Unioas shunned Lib. 30.11. by his virtuous Southern colleagues, he made his first manifesto in a speech on his bill to admit Kansas. Instead Feb. 29, 1860; Lib. 30.31, 37. of proclaiming afresh, with all the force of the latest evidence, the irreprese Republican Party from the stigma of universal cowardice. If slavery is right in Virginia, said Lovejoy, it is right in Kansas—words of whose full logic he stopped short, indeed, but which confirmed the South in its habit of identifying the Republiowardly were the Republicans that, Mr. Seward chancing to be in Chicago, and having recovered his tone in a late visit to Kansas, so as to be able to reaffirm the irrepressible conflict, the Lib. 30.161. party managers wanted their torchlight proces
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
m, and with their future looking out of their eyes, the slaveholder, or the abolitionist either, believes the lies that they call speeches. William Pinkney of Maryland, addressing the U. S. Senate on April 15, 1820, on the admission of Missouri, and repelling the intimation that the slave States did not possess a republican forich their arguments must lead if they are of any value? Do they reflect that they lead to emancipation in the old United States, or to an exclusion of Delaware, Maryland and all the South, and a great portion of the West, from the Union? . . . They have no disposition to meddle with slavery in the old United States. Perhaps not-ccompanied by what seemed a necessary provision for the surrender of fugitive slaves —else had the District become a refuge for them from the adjoining States of Maryland and Virginia, and from the whole seaboard. Singling out this provision, Mr. Phillips published in the Liberator of June Lib. 30.99. 22, 1860, a stinging articl
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
on is at hand. Lib. 30.2. He pressed forward the renewal of the petitions to the Legislature for a law to make Lib. 30.2, 23, 50. slavecatching impossible in Massachusetts, and addressed the Lib. 30.27. Committee to whom they were referred, and who again disappointed his hope, rather than his expectation. He Lib. 30.50. knew Party could escape this just condemnation, subserviency was in some merely a logical attitude. While Governor Banks vetoed Lib. 30.10, 30. a revised code of Massachusetts rather than tolerate the omission of the word white from its militia law, and revetoed the bill introduced and passed as a separate Lib. 30.43, [46]. measure;There was yet time before the inauguration of Lincoln to arrange a final compromise to restore forever the tottering Union as it was. In this fatuous endeavor Massachusetts Republicans were destined to take part—among them the son of John Quincy Adams. In 1820 the father wrote in his Diary, 5.12. Diary: I have favored this
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
bolitionist either, believes the lies that they call speeches. William Pinkney of Maryland, addressing the U. S. Senate on April 15, 1820, on the admission of Missouri, and repelling the intimation that the slave States did not possess a republican form of government, as guaranteed by the Constitution, asked: Do gentlemen perces Republicans were destined to take part—among them the son of John Quincy Adams. In 1820 the father wrote in his Diary, 5.12. Diary: I have favored this Missouri Compromise, believing it to be all that could be effected under the present Constitution, and from extreme unwillingness to put the Union at hazard. But perhaps it would have been a wiser as well as a bolder course to have persisted in the restriction upon Missouri, till it should have terminated in a convention of the States to revise and amend the Constitution. This would have produced a new Union of thirteen or fourteen States unpolluted with slavery, with a great and glorious object
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): chapter 20
30.165. avoid passing his hotel! In the same city, Mayor John Wentworth having helped pay the fine of men Lib. 30.165, 177. imprisoned for aiding a fugitive to escape, and presided at a public deliverance meeting, The party is crushed! Lib. 30.177. was heard from the audience; Lincoln is defeated! Long John is playing thunder with us! Long John has gone over to Douglas! The Higher Power at the helm of affairs paid no attention to such trivialities. The October State elections in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana, following those in New Lib. 30.163, 147. England, clearly foreshadowed the result of the national contest. Will the South be so obliging as to secede from the Union? Lib. 30.163. asked Mr. Garrison. And, I salute your Convention with hope and joy, he wrote to his Lib. 30.175. friend Johnston in Vermont, on October 15. All the omens are with us. Forward! N. R. Johnston. On the sixth of November, Lincoln was elected by the vote of every Northern Lib. 30.178. State
... 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341