hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Jonas Chickering 34 2 Browse Search
Staffordshire (United Kingdom) 25 1 Browse Search
Meaford (United Kingdom) 25 1 Browse Search
New England (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Susanna Rowson 23 1 Browse Search
Matthew Cradock 21 1 Browse Search
Caleb Brooks 18 0 Browse Search
John Montgomery 16 4 Browse Search
Caleb Swan 16 0 Browse Search
William De Caverswall 16 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Medford Historical Society Papers, Volume 25.. Search the whole document.

Found 33 total hits in 21 results.

1 2 3
April 1st (search for this): chapter 9
A few views show features now obliterated and the improvement there made. Twentyfive reports, from as many departments, were addressed to the mayor and form the bulk of the latest published report, that of 1920. Three hundred copies of this book of 383 pages were printed. Another publication, not included in those already mentioned, has been furnished to citizens on application — the Poll, or Ward Book, as some style it. It bears the title, List of Persons in Medford Assessed a Poll Tax April 1 of the stated year. The names in each ward are given in alphabetical order of street, reading across the page, thus: House Number, Name, Age, Occupation, Residence in Previous Year. The last issued under the above caption was that of 1920, 292 pages, and contained 10,667 names. The Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution caused a change in the form of the assessors' publication, which appeared in a separate book for each ward, with covers of differing color, entitled, Persons Listed as
to 93 nay, with 10 votes paired on each. The final effort of the petitioners in 1889 proved more ineffectual, the vote being 48 in favor, 109 against. This was the death knell of town government in Medford. In those years the population of the whole town had increased almost to the minimum number requisite for a city charter, the census of 1890 enumerating 11,770. The March meeting of 1891 appointed a committee to consider the advisability of petitioning for such, which committee in November reported that its census taken showed the population to be 12,100, and recommended that a city charter be obtained. Such petition to the General Court being granted at its session of 1892, its action was accepted at a special town meeting. It is somewhat significant of the good sense of those earlier petitioners, who foresaw danger in delegating their rights and privileges to the few, that the charter was accepted October 6, 1892, by a vote of 382 as against 342. The first election fo
February 1st, 1835 AD (search for this): chapter 9
Medford Municipal publications. The earliest of such to be printed that comes under our notice is Receipts and Expenditures of the town for the year ending February 1, 1835, i.e., for the preceding fiscal year. It was a thin pamphlet of twenty-four pages, including the list of tax payers, resident and nonresident being listed separately. In later years were added brief reports of the various town officers, and recommendations made by them. At intervals the valuation list made by the assessors was included. A collection of these may be found in the Public Library. The issues of several years are grouped into one volume, and though at the time substantially bound, are in need of rebinding, owing to the deterioration of the leather. Our first acquaintance with such Medford output was in the spring of 1871, when the constable left at our home the warrant for the annual town meeting—March meeting we called it then—accompanied by the Town book, or reports of the preceding yea
substantially bound, are in need of rebinding, owing to the deterioration of the leather. Our first acquaintance with such Medford output was in the spring of 1871, when the constable left at our home the warrant for the annual town meeting—March meeting we called it then—accompanied by the Town book, or reports of the preceding year of 1870. The town meeting was then thus warned at every dwelling within its limits. Medford had then a population of 5,517, having more than doubled since 1838, when its first printed report was issued. The tax rate (1870) was $3.60 per thousand, there were 899 dwellings (61 being double), 1,480 ratable polls and 1,403 resident tax payers, including 747 who paid poll tax only, which was then $1.50. In that issue, thirty-four pages covered the tax payers list, forty-six the financial statements. The reports of various departments fill nearly one hundred pages, and ask for an appropriation for 1871 of $88,468.56. Medford had the previous year bui
the annual town meeting—March meeting we called it then—accompanied by the Town book, or reports of the preceding year of 1870. The town meeting was then thus warned at every dwelling within its limits. Medford had then a population of 5,517, having more than doubled since 1838, when its first printed report was issued. The tax rate (1870) was $3.60 per thousand, there were 899 dwellings (61 being double), 1,480 ratable polls and 1,403 resident tax payers, including 747 who paid poll tax ourden, an examination of the account of public expenditure is of real interest. Allusion has been made to the report of 1870. We have before us our entire lot for fifty years. They are not cast in one mold, though their pages are of uniform size.d amount of the tax bill they grumble about, and finally with sacrificing effort pay? We have alluded to the report for 1870 and its distribution to every dwelling in town. There were probably 1,000 copies printed, and the month that intervened b
ary. The issues of several years are grouped into one volume, and though at the time substantially bound, are in need of rebinding, owing to the deterioration of the leather. Our first acquaintance with such Medford output was in the spring of 1871, when the constable left at our home the warrant for the annual town meeting—March meeting we called it then—accompanied by the Town book, or reports of the preceding year of 1870. The town meeting was then thus warned at every dwelling within it who paid poll tax only, which was then $1.50. In that issue, thirty-four pages covered the tax payers list, forty-six the financial statements. The reports of various departments fill nearly one hundred pages, and ask for an appropriation for 1871 of $88,468.56. Medford had the previous year built its water works. The town debt, exclusive of water bonds, was $59,000, funded over a period of nineteen years, with a balance in the treasury of $21,386.09, with $2,000 due from the state. The t
eir pages are of uniform size. Some have details omitted by others; some reports are prolix, others very brief. A few have the records of town meetings. Some make especial note of some public enterprise to the neglect of other. For the year 1890 the book is of over six hundred pages, the valuation list occupying one-third. That year and the next the town had six voting precincts for elections, the precursor of what was coming. The census of 1890 gave 11,790 as Medford's population. In 1885 a petition was presented to the General Court from inhabitants of West Medford, asking that a division of the town be made, and that the western portion be incorporated as a new town under the name of Brooks. Medford had then a population of 9,041. The petitioners at this hearing set forth that they were opposed to a city form of government and desired separation in order to retain the management of their prudential affairs in the hands of the many, and not delegate all their rights and pri
n the management of their prudential affairs in the hands of the many, and not delegate all their rights and privileges to the control of a few. The hearings before the legislative committee, to whom it was referred, together with arguments of counsel, form interesting reading, published as it was in separate volumes, that of the petitioners 171 pages, that of the remonstrants 203. Five successive efforts were made toward this end in as many years without success. The fourth effort, that of 1888, came nearest success. Though a majority of the Committee on Towns reported leave to withdraw, a substitute report to incorporate the town of Brooks was lost by a yea and nay vote of 89 yea to 93 nay, with 10 votes paired on each. The final effort of the petitioners in 1889 proved more ineffectual, the vote being 48 in favor, 109 against. This was the death knell of town government in Medford. In those years the population of the whole town had increased almost to the minimum number r
published as it was in separate volumes, that of the petitioners 171 pages, that of the remonstrants 203. Five successive efforts were made toward this end in as many years without success. The fourth effort, that of 1888, came nearest success. Though a majority of the Committee on Towns reported leave to withdraw, a substitute report to incorporate the town of Brooks was lost by a yea and nay vote of 89 yea to 93 nay, with 10 votes paired on each. The final effort of the petitioners in 1889 proved more ineffectual, the vote being 48 in favor, 109 against. This was the death knell of town government in Medford. In those years the population of the whole town had increased almost to the minimum number requisite for a city charter, the census of 1890 enumerating 11,770. The March meeting of 1891 appointed a committee to consider the advisability of petitioning for such, which committee in November reported that its census taken showed the population to be 12,100, and recommend
are prolix, others very brief. A few have the records of town meetings. Some make especial note of some public enterprise to the neglect of other. For the year 1890 the book is of over six hundred pages, the valuation list occupying one-third. That year and the next the town had six voting precincts for elections, the precursor of what was coming. The census of 1890 gave 11,790 as Medford's population. In 1885 a petition was presented to the General Court from inhabitants of West Medford, asking that a division of the town be made, and that the western portion be incorporated as a new town under the name of Brooks. Medford had then a population ofwn government in Medford. In those years the population of the whole town had increased almost to the minimum number requisite for a city charter, the census of 1890 enumerating 11,770. The March meeting of 1891 appointed a committee to consider the advisability of petitioning for such, which committee in November reported tha
1 2 3