hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Thomas B. Lincoln 36 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 32 0 Browse Search
Henry A. Wise 26 0 Browse Search
Patterson 23 11 Browse Search
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
Buckhannon (West Virginia, United States) 17 1 Browse Search
Harper's Ferry (West Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
N. B. Hill 14 0 Browse Search
Seward 13 1 Browse Search
Charles H. Upton 11 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 9, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 50 total hits in 24 results.

1 2 3
Maine (Maine, United States) (search for this): article 7
ed power of this body to admit new States. One of these gentlemen is according to his own confession, a citizen of the State of Ohio, yet he claims to represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds than the rules of this House — upon the Constitution. He moved that the credentials of the gentlemen claiming to represent Virginia be submitted to a committee with instructions to report, &c. Mr. John S. Carlile, of Virginia, said he could not permit his right to represent his constituency here to be brought into question by the acts of gentlemen from another secti
Ohio (Ohio, United States) (search for this): article 7
, then the power of the State Convention to prohibit, as is aid, the Congressional elections on the 23d of May, must be conceded, and there gentlemen, a portion only of whom were elected on the day legally fixed for such elections, can have no standing here; but if they come as delegates from a new State, then their recognition and admission would carry with it the assumed power of this body to admit new States. One of these gentlemen is according to his own confession, a citizen of the State of Ohio, yet he claims to represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds t
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): article 7
to admit new States. One of these gentlemen is according to his own confession, a citizen of the State of Ohio, yet he claims to represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds than the rules of this House — upon the Constitution. He moved that the credentials of the gentlemen claiming to represent Virginia be submitted to a committee with instructions to report, &c. Mr. John S. Carlile, of Virginia, said he could not permit his right to represent his constituency here to be brought into question by the acts of gentlemen from another section of the same State.
New Hampshire (New Hampshire, United States) (search for this): article 7
4th inst., after the election of Galusha A. Grow to the Speakership, the following individuals were sworn in as Representatives of the State of Virginia: John S. Carlile, C. H. Upton, R. V. Whaley, G. Pendleton and W. G. Brown. We copy from the proceedings as they afterwards transpired: Mr. Cox, of Ohio, objected to Mr. Charles H. Upton being recognized as a member of this body. He was in possession of authentic and perfectly reliable information that Mr. Upton--who is a native of New Hampshire--was and is a citizen of Ohio, where he but recently published a newspaper, and where, so late as last fall, he voted. Mr. Upton's right to vote in Ohio had than been challenged, but he asserted his citizenship in that State, and was allowed to vote. Mr. Cox said he had no other object in agitating this question than to vindicate the decency and dignity of the House. Mr. Upton admitted that he had voted in Ohio, as alleged, and that he had, until lately, published a paper in Ohio;
Virginia (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 7
Pan-Handle traitors Assume to represent Virginia! In the Washington House of Representatives, on the 4th inst., after the election of Galusha A. Grow to the Speakership, the following individuals were sworn in as Representatives of the State of Virginia: John S. Carlile, C. H. Upton, R. V. Whaley, G. Pendleton and W. G. Brown. We copy from the proceedings as they afterwards transpired: Mr. Cox, of Ohio, objected to Mr. Charles H. Upton being recognized as a member of this body. He won admitted that he had voted in Ohio, as alleged, and that he had, until lately, published a paper in Ohio; but he had not been in that State, except on an occasional visit, for five months, and for many years he had been a resident of the State of Virginia.--He was glad, however, that when the country was reeling with anarchy, the gentleman should be so desirous of vindicating the decency and dignity of the House. Mr. Burnett, of Kentucky, also protested against the admission of those cl
Illinois (Illinois, United States) (search for this): article 7
entlemen from another section of the same State. The only question involved in his case was whether the State Convention, which had been created by the Legislature, was empowered to annul a law of the Legislature. By the laws of Virginia, the Congressional election is fixed on the fourth Thursday in May; and upon that day his constituents, disregarding the ordinance of the State Convention, which they knew to have been tyrannical and illegal in that relation, elected him, with but twenty-three dissentient voices, to represent them in Congress; and his colleague, Win. G. Brown, from the adjoining district, was also elected in a like manner upon the same day. Calls for the previous question upon Mr. Burnett's resolution were made by Messrs. Washburne and Richardson of Illinois. Mr. Cox moved to lay the resolution upon the table, and upon this motion Mr. Burnett demanded the yeas and nays, but his call for them not being seconded, the motion of Mr. Cox was adopted viva voce.
House (search for this): article 7
represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds than the rules of this House — upon the Constitution. He moved that the credentials of the gentlemen claiming to represent Virginia be submitted to a committee with instructions to report, &c. Mr. John S. Carlile, of Virginia, said he could not permit his right to represent his constituency here to be brought into question by the acts of gentlemen from another section of the same State. The only question involved in his case was whether the State Convention, which had been created by the Legislature, was empowere
Morrill (search for this): article 7
h it the assumed power of this body to admit new States. One of these gentlemen is according to his own confession, a citizen of the State of Ohio, yet he claims to represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds than the rules of this House — upon the Constitution. He moved that the credentials of the gentlemen claiming to represent Virginia be submitted to a committee with instructions to report, &c. Mr. John S. Carlile, of Virginia, said he could not permit his right to represent his constituency here to be brought into question by the acts of gentlemen from
Charles H. Upton (search for this): article 7
owing individuals were sworn in as Representatives of the State of Virginia: John S. Carlile, C. H. Upton, R. V. Whaley, G. Pendleton and W. G. Brown. We copy from the proceedings as they afterwards transpired: Mr. Cox, of Ohio, objected to Mr. Charles H. Upton being recognized as a member of this body. He was in possession of authentic and perfectly reliable information that Mr. Upton--whMr. Upton--who is a native of New Hampshire--was and is a citizen of Ohio, where he but recently published a newspaper, and where, so late as last fall, he voted. Mr. Upton's right to vote in Ohio had than been Mr. Upton's right to vote in Ohio had than been challenged, but he asserted his citizenship in that State, and was allowed to vote. Mr. Cox said he had no other object in agitating this question than to vindicate the decency and dignity of the House. Mr. Upton admitted that he had voted in Ohio, as alleged, and that he had, until lately, published a paper in Ohio; but he had not been in that State, except on an occasional visit, for fiv
Lovejoy (search for this): article 7
ates. One of these gentlemen is according to his own confession, a citizen of the State of Ohio, yet he claims to represent Virginia here in regulating citizenship within her boundaries. He had no desire to appear factions, but would act resolutely in accordance with his conscientious convictions of duty. All that he desired was to get a direct vote of the House upon the question. Mr. Burnett was several times interrupted by Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Stevens of Pennsylvania, and Lovejoy, with points of order, but replied that he based his proceeding upon higher grounds than the rules of this House — upon the Constitution. He moved that the credentials of the gentlemen claiming to represent Virginia be submitted to a committee with instructions to report, &c. Mr. John S. Carlile, of Virginia, said he could not permit his right to represent his constituency here to be brought into question by the acts of gentlemen from another section of the same State. The only quest
1 2 3