hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 28 0 Browse Search
Albert Sidney Johnston 19 5 Browse Search
France (France) 18 0 Browse Search
Bowling Green (Indiana, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Beauregard 16 8 Browse Search
John W. Hill 16 0 Browse Search
Reward Griffin 14 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 13 1 Browse Search
Donelson (Indiana, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 8, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 92 total hits in 18 results.

1 2
United States (United States) (search for this): article 6
re set forth in the convention between the three Powers, which engross not to seek for any acquisition of territory and not to exercise any influence which might prevent the Mexican nation from freely choosing its own form of Government. The United States had also been invited to take part in the expedition, but they have ulterior views, and the allied policy does not suit them. The Minister denied that there was any intention to establish a monarchy in Mexico, contrary to the desire of the pbeen cut to pieces in Virginia. It is pretended that this extraordinary intelligence come through private sources, but I am rather inclined to believe it the fruit of Bourse invention for purposes of speculation. A late letter from Turin states that at the first grand diplomatic dinner, given by Ratazzi, the Minister of the United States proposed a toast to "the happiness and union of a divided people"--a sentiment supposed by those present to convey a double meaning. Perhaps it did.
France (France) (search for this): article 6
lation of the principle of non-intervention, which, France and England had proclaimed and enforced in Europe. ality still existed and ought not to be destroyed. France struggled during four centuries before her unity wareasonable time were allowed him. Public opinion in France in favorable to Mexico, and the speaker trusted that France would not, by too much precipitation, lose the friendship of that country, or compromise the great prs, which would doubtless have been paid at once had France made her demand alone, instead of joining the hard the pretensions on which the blood and treasure of France were lavished under pretext of avenging the wrongs n spoke in behalf of the Government. The war which France had declared against Mexico was as legitimate as anral Consuls have been imprisoned, and a Minister of France threatened. Dignity and interest alike require tha was to remove any suspicion other in sessions that France invited England and Spains to join her. The true mo
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) (search for this): article 6
oard, and to be ready in six days to leave for Mexico with 300 men, 120 horses, and a thousand tons some light on the intentions of the French in Mexico — I should have given in my letter of Friday a flag on the palace of the Spanish Viceroy, in Mexico, in 1818, when the independence of the country him. Public opinion in France in favorable to Mexico, and the speaker trusted that France would notirty millions of francs, in sending an army to Mexico. M. Favre alluded to the reports afloat in re. What has taken place in Rome would occur in Mexico; a garrison must be maintained there, and whennt. The war which France had declared against Mexico was as legitimate as any war could be. For mand should be put to the violence and anarchy in Mexico. Every effort has been made to come to an amie was any intention to establish a monarchy in Mexico, contrary to the desire of the people. The so To sum up, French interests called for war on Mexico, and it would be carried on with energy. [4 more...]
Banks (search for this): article 6
l were without foundation, and the alarm of Earl was removed by an interview with M. Thouvenal. To sum up, French interests called for war on Mexico, and it would be carried on with energy. The Favre amendment was then voted down and the original paragraph subsequently adopted. There were rumors current in Paris yesterday of Union disasters, and the Bourse was considerably influenced by them. One story was that the Federal forces had been defeated at Columbus, and another that Gen. Banks's corps d'armes had been cut to pieces in Virginia. It is pretended that this extraordinary intelligence come through private sources, but I am rather inclined to believe it the fruit of Bourse invention for purposes of speculation. A late letter from Turin states that at the first grand diplomatic dinner, given by Ratazzi, the Minister of the United States proposed a toast to "the happiness and union of a divided people"--a sentiment supposed by those present to convey a double mea
French (search for this): article 6
and the speaker trusted that France would not, by too much precipitation, lose the friendship of that country, or compromise the great principles of 1789. M. Favre spoke on the amendment offered by himself and colleagues, the text of which I gave in a previous letter. He defended the Mexicans, and stated that the French Government claim was only 759,000 francs, which would doubtless have been paid at once had France made her demand alone, instead of joining the hard Spaniards. The private French claims amounted to between three and four millions of dollars, but the total debt certainly did not justify an expenditure of twenty or thirty millions of francs, in sending an army to Mexico. M. Favre alluded to the reports afloat in relation to establishing a Mexican monarchy, and read a dispatch from Earl Cowley to Earl Russell, in which mention was made of the Archduke Maximilian for he contemplated throne. Such were the pretensions on which the blood and treasure of France were la
Jabinal Favre (search for this): article 6
me designation, and the general belief is that a second full brigade (,800) is to be sent out immediately. Meantime the legislative discussion on paragraph 6th of the address throws some light on the intentions of the French in Mexico — I should have given in my letter of Friday a summary of the debate in question, but for the fact of our own affairs as discussed in the Chamber of Deputies, having accepted an entire letter. The principal speakers on the Mexican intervention were Messrs Jabinal Favre, and one of the Emperor's Ministers, M. Billault. M. Jubinal hoped the French flag would speedily triumph in Mexico, but he was anxious to know the precise object of the expedition. There had been rumors of an intention to overthrow Republican Government in that country, and to substitute in its place a Monarchy, with an Austrian or Belgian Prince, or a Spanish Princess, on the throne. If such were the purpose of the Allies, the speaker protested against this violation of the princi
Turin (search for this): article 6
and the alarm of Earl was removed by an interview with M. Thouvenal. To sum up, French interests called for war on Mexico, and it would be carried on with energy. The Favre amendment was then voted down and the original paragraph subsequently adopted. There were rumors current in Paris yesterday of Union disasters, and the Bourse was considerably influenced by them. One story was that the Federal forces had been defeated at Columbus, and another that Gen. Banks's corps d'armes had been cut to pieces in Virginia. It is pretended that this extraordinary intelligence come through private sources, but I am rather inclined to believe it the fruit of Bourse invention for purposes of speculation. A late letter from Turin states that at the first grand diplomatic dinner, given by Ratazzi, the Minister of the United States proposed a toast to "the happiness and union of a divided people"--a sentiment supposed by those present to convey a double meaning. Perhaps it did.
M. Favre (search for this): article 6
, and the speaker trusted that France would not, by too much precipitation, lose the friendship of that country, or compromise the great principles of 1789. M. Favre spoke on the amendment offered by himself and colleagues, the text of which I gave in a previous letter. He defended the Mexicans, and stated that the French Go and four millions of dollars, but the total debt certainly did not justify an expenditure of twenty or thirty millions of francs, in sending an army to Mexico. M. Favre alluded to the reports afloat in relation to establishing a Mexican monarchy, and read a dispatch from Earl Cowley to Earl Russell, in which mention was made of arm of Earl was removed by an interview with M. Thouvenal. To sum up, French interests called for war on Mexico, and it would be carried on with energy. The Favre amendment was then voted down and the original paragraph subsequently adopted. There were rumors current in Paris yesterday of Union disasters, and the Bourse
Paris (search for this): article 6
Letter from Paris. important debate in the legislative Chamber on the Mexican question. [Correspondence of the Baltimore American.] Paris, Tuesday, March 18, 1862. The French Government has suddenly determined to send still another reinforcement to the army in Mexico. The port of Tonton again resounds with the busy note of preparation. On Saturday last the commander of the steam-frigate Seine, which was about to carry two regiments to received orders to land everything on board, and to be ready in six days to leave for Mexico with 300 men, 120 horses, and a thousand tons of war material. Several large vessels are under orders for the same designation, and the general belief is that a second full brigade (,800) is to be sent out immediately. Meantime the legislative discussion on paragraph 6th of the address throws some light on the intentions of the French in Mexico — I should have given in my letter of Friday a summary of the debate in question, but f
Belgian Prince (search for this): article 6
irs as discussed in the Chamber of Deputies, having accepted an entire letter. The principal speakers on the Mexican intervention were Messrs Jabinal Favre, and one of the Emperor's Ministers, M. Billault. M. Jubinal hoped the French flag would speedily triumph in Mexico, but he was anxious to know the precise object of the expedition. There had been rumors of an intention to overthrow Republican Government in that country, and to substitute in its place a Monarchy, with an Austrian or Belgian Prince, or a Spanish Princess, on the throne. If such were the purpose of the Allies, the speaker protested against this violation of the principle of non-intervention, which, France and England had proclaimed and enforced in Europe. A new nationality raised its flag on the palace of the Spanish Viceroy, in Mexico, in 1818, when the independence of the country was established. That natonality still existed and ought not to be destroyed. France struggled during four centuries before her unit
1 2