hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Stonewall Jackson 26 0 Browse Search
Lt Jas 24 0 Browse Search
Joseph S. James 20 0 Browse Search
Lt Geo 18 0 Browse Search
Lt Thos 17 1 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Front Royal (Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Strasburg, Va. (Virginia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
James Anderson 13 1 Browse Search
Ashby 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 13, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 7 total hits in 5 results.

Stafford Court House (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 13
er. Mr. W. M. Williams and Mr. Bird, the chemical witnesses for the plaintiff suspecting that the learned doctor would advance the theory that animal life cannot exist in water tainted with gas, determined to give it a flat contradiction by producing in court a live fish, swimming in a mixture of half announce of the gas tank water with 25 ounces of pure water, having about the small and taste of the water in plaintiff's well. Accordingly, a fine healthy gudgeon was caught in the river at Stafford, put into a basin, the basin filled with the above mixture, and slipped under a seat in court, ready for the Doctor, should he advance his theory, which upon his examination he soon did, asserting most positively that the least taint of gas in water would destroy animal life, when, to his evident surprise, and amid a general roar of laughter, in which the learned judge heartily joined, the basin, with the fish swimming in it, was lifted up and placed on the centre of the table, full in view
ford, shire Gas Company, in which the plaintiff sued the gas company for damages caused by them in allowing the "tank gas water" from their gasometer to flow into the plaintiff's, well. Dr. Letheby, the analytical chemist, and officer of health of the city of London, being engaged as one of the scientific witnesses on the part of the gas company, he thought to prove that gas water could not have entered the plaintiff's well, because he found animalcule in the water. Mr. W. M. Williams and Mr. Bird, the chemical witnesses for the plaintiff suspecting that the learned doctor would advance the theory that animal life cannot exist in water tainted with gas, determined to give it a flat contradiction by producing in court a live fish, swimming in a mixture of half announce of the gas tank water with 25 ounces of pure water, having about the small and taste of the water in plaintiff's well. Accordingly, a fine healthy gudgeon was caught in the river at Stafford, put into a basin, the basi
A fish a witness in a Court of justice. --This rather startling incident actually occurred at the Stafford Assizes lately, in the cause of Timmons vs. the Birmingham and Stafford, shire Gas Company, in which the plaintiff sued the gas company for damages caused by them in allowing the "tank gas water" from their gasometer to flow into the plaintiff's, well. Dr. Letheby, the analytical chemist, and officer of health of the city of London, being engaged as one of the scientific witnesses on the part of the gas company, he thought to prove that gas water could not have entered the plaintiff's well, because he found animalcule in the water. Mr. W. M. Williams and Mr. Bird, the chemical witnesses for the plaintiff suspecting that the learned doctor would advance the theory that animal life cannot exist in water tainted with gas, determined to give it a flat contradiction by producing in court a live fish, swimming in a mixture of half announce of the gas tank water with 25 ounces o
A fish a witness in a Court of justice. --This rather startling incident actually occurred at the Stafford Assizes lately, in the cause of Timmons vs. the Birmingham and Stafford, shire Gas Company, in which the plaintiff sued the gas company for damages caused by them in allowing the "tank gas water" from their gasometer to flow into the plaintiff's, well. Dr. Letheby, the analytical chemist, and officer of health of the city of London, being engaged as one of the scientific witnesses on the part of the gas company, he thought to prove that gas water could not have entered the plaintiff's well, because he found animalcule in the water. Mr. W. M. Williams and Mr. Bird, the chemical witnesses for the plaintiff suspecting that the learned doctor would advance the theory that animal life cannot exist in water tainted with gas, determined to give it a flat contradiction by producing in court a live fish, swimming in a mixture of half announce of the gas tank water with 25 ounces o
W. M. Williams (search for this): article 13
irmingham and Stafford, shire Gas Company, in which the plaintiff sued the gas company for damages caused by them in allowing the "tank gas water" from their gasometer to flow into the plaintiff's, well. Dr. Letheby, the analytical chemist, and officer of health of the city of London, being engaged as one of the scientific witnesses on the part of the gas company, he thought to prove that gas water could not have entered the plaintiff's well, because he found animalcule in the water. Mr. W. M. Williams and Mr. Bird, the chemical witnesses for the plaintiff suspecting that the learned doctor would advance the theory that animal life cannot exist in water tainted with gas, determined to give it a flat contradiction by producing in court a live fish, swimming in a mixture of half announce of the gas tank water with 25 ounces of pure water, having about the small and taste of the water in plaintiff's well. Accordingly, a fine healthy gudgeon was caught in the river at Stafford, put into