hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
B. F. Butler 43 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 28 0 Browse Search
Armstrong 14 2 Browse Search
Lincoln 14 10 Browse Search
Jones H. French 13 1 Browse Search
Dorn 11 3 Browse Search
Forrest 10 0 Browse Search
A. S. King 10 0 Browse Search
Gen Banks 10 0 Browse Search
Anderson 9 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 21, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 65 total hits in 37 results.

1 2 3 4
United States (United States) (search for this): article 7
Union and the cause of negro emancipation is in their view, one and the came. And in their eagerness to see it proper they seem in great danger of sinking the distinctions between right and wrong.--This is not the proper position for Englishmen. Our policy is that of strick centrality, and it is inconsistent, with that policy to take violently either one side or the other. England had no desire to see fulfilled what she could not help forecasting — the break up of the Union. Had the United States continued united. Englishmen would not have grudged them their peace, nor any of the prosperity which might have come of it.--Should the disunited States by any happy fortune become reunited, England's attitude towards them would be the same still. It is their affair, not curn. We are glad to see them prosper, and so long as they maintain friendly relations with us they are free to regulate their own affairs as they please. Our attitude is now what it was before the war broke out. Pr
Bradford, Vt. (Vermont, United States) (search for this): article 7
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
Exeter, N. H. (New Hampshire, United States) (search for this): article 7
ventured upon, it becomes expedient to ask what manner of men the trumpeters may be who have so very fiercely attempted to blast down the walls of Jericho. Let us glance at some of the most conspicuous of the tribunes who, by hook or by crook, were got together under the auspices of the Emancipation Society. The chairman was Mr. William Evans, doubtless a most worthy and estimable member of society, but who, as a politician, orater, or public man, is utterly unknown beyond the confines of Exeter. Hall. Mr. P. A. Taylor, M. P., is a rampant kind of Republican, who very speedily found his level in the Commons House of Parliament. Mr. Thomas Hughes is a crochety clever man, who gained some literary reputation by an amusing boys" book called "Tom Brown's School Days," and lost it by an inconceivably stupid novel called " Tom Brown at Oxford." The Rev. Newman Hall and Baptist Noel are fluent preachers, sufficiently popular in some Dissenting circles. Mr. Edmond Beales is, we believe, a
Galveston (Texas, United States) (search for this): article 7
has not been attained we think is pretty clear, and the other, which is by far the most important, has been equally missed. Whatever may be the merits or faints of Mr. Lincoln's policy, his proclamation has had but one effect, and that is to make the Confederates more fierce and resolute than ever. When the last news left more than a fortnight had elapsed since the proclamation, and no sign of wavering had appeared at the South. The Confederates had opened the new year with a victory at Galveston, and at Vicksburg had inflicted on the Federal a defeat hardly less bloody and quite as important as that of Fredericksburg. Two military disasters and a rise of — gold to 50 premium are the first fruits of the masterly document of the 2d of January and a still more important matter is the widespread anger of all but the Republican zealots. New York has spoken through Mr. Seymour, and now the Governor of Kentucky, a firm Unionist, and a man to whom the North is mainly indebted for keepin
John Stuart Mill (search for this): article 7
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
ntioned, the emancipators may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long
E. J. P. Thompson (search for this): article 7
en and many clergymen, but, independently of the gentlemen whose names we have mentioned, the emancipators may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity,
B. F. Butler (search for this): article 7
than it will result from the meeting of the English Parliament. It is desirable that this slavery question should be put upon a right footing. Recent attempts to mix it up with the triumph of the Northern arms are not creditable to English common sense. The civil war had its origin in causes only indirectly affected by the alive question, and must be finished without reference to it. Those gentlemen, therefore, who go to Exeter Hall and make heavy speeches in favor of Mr. Lincoln and General Butler, and give in their adhesion to the Northern policy through thick and thin, and talk unctuously about the Divine blessing on the Federal arms, and go in on Christian principles for a war of extermination, and who blacken the names of Southern Generals and palliate the monstrosities of the Northern leaders, would do well to reserve their eloquence to a later stage and in the meantime learn to distinguish a little more clearly between light and darkness. At the meeting at Exeter Hall,
W. Hargreaves (search for this): article 7
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
may be emphatically described as nobodies. We are ready to grant that the painful obscurity of this personnel was no fault of the promoters of the meeting. They had labored hard to cajole individuals of real parts and imminence into attending. They had asked Johnson and Burke; but, as in the famous instance of "the Haunch of Venison," Johnson and Burke "couldn't come." Good old General Thompson sent ten pounds to the funds of the association, but stayed away; Mr. Forster, M. P., would have come, but he was bespoken for a meeting at Bradford; Mr. John Stuart Mill had no time to spare for anything of the kind; Professor Newman was unfortunately engaged to lecture at University College; Professor Cairnce was simply "unable to attend" Mr. W. Hargreaves was similarly incapacitated from coming, but sent instead a paragraph of florid nonsense about liberty, equality, and fraternity, and "the Beelzebub of the press," and Colonel Salwey had an appointment of long standing at Edisburgh.
1 2 3 4