hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
French Forrest 25 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 20 0 Browse Search
C. L. Vallandigham 18 0 Browse Search
Thomas J. Jackson 14 2 Browse Search
Privates Adams 12 0 Browse Search
Hooker 11 3 Browse Search
George B. McClellan 10 0 Browse Search
Barksdale 9 1 Browse Search
France (France) 8 0 Browse Search
Richmond (Virginia, United States) 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: May 13, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 47 total hits in 23 results.

1 2 3
United States (United States) (search for this): article 13
f Commons, on the — thault., Mr. Roebuck said he wished to ask a question of great importance. [Hear, hear] He alluded to the proceedings of an Admiral in the United States service, with respect to an English merchant ship going from an English port to a neutral port. [Hear, hear,] He wished to preface his question with one or twIt appears that the question of which I have given notice creates a great sensation among them. [Hear, hear.] Well, sir, the conduct of the North American dis-United States has been such as is humiliating to the people of England. [Cheers.] The noble lord has shown himself hitherto a friend of the honor, the dignity and the prosptimate trade. The mail question. In the House of Lords, on the 24th, Lord Ridesdale referred to Mr. Seward's instructions to the naval officers of the United States cruisers, directing that the mails should not be opened when seized on board any ship, but should be either given up to the Consul of the nation to which the v
Joseph Wells (search for this): article 13
any way acquiesce in it. The Marquis of Claricarde hoped the Government would take the matter into their serious consideration. Lord Chelmsford asked if there was any truth in the report that four more British vessels had been seized, as stated in the evening papers. Earl Russell said that Government had received information that vessels had been seized in the act of breaking the blockade. He wished to explain that, in answer to Lord Lyons, Mr. Seward had written a letter to Mr. Wells modifying the instructions issued by the latter to the officers of the Federal navy, and it was to this letter he referred. He would, however, consult the law officers of the crown. The Earl of Hardwick said that the vacillation shown by the Government would, as a matter of course, be attributed to fear. He hoped that the Secretary of State would rise in his place and say that the pretensions of the Federal Government were unjustifiable. Lord Taunton could not agree in any censu
Wilkes (search for this): article 13
I know the noble Lord is an older man than I am; but still, older as he is, he will not take me in that way. [A laugh.] I wish to make a few observations before I put the question to the noble Lord. The question relates to the conduct of Admiral Wilkes. Sir, when the American war broke out I may say the large majority of the English people felt a shock of opinion in regard to the quarrel between the various States of America. [Hear, hear.] I may say for myself that shock was of a very strountry will no longer be subject to the sneering insolence of an upstart race. [Cheers.] The question I have to ask the noble Lord is, whether the Government of which he is the head have formed any determination with regard to the conduct of Admiral Wilkes; whether they have addressed any remonstrance to the American Government, and whether he is prepared now to state the course the Government have determined to pursue? [Hear, hear] Lord Palmerston said the House would at once understand,
1 2 3