hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
N. B. Hill 26 0 Browse Search
John J. Green 20 4 Browse Search
Gen Johnston 16 0 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Disraeli 11 1 Browse Search
J. J. Green 10 0 Browse Search
Henrico (Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Hardee 9 1 Browse Search
La France 8 0 Browse Search
Lewis 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 23, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 16 total hits in 8 results.

Capitol Hill (United States) (search for this): article 4
l Square is mistaken — no unusual thing with him, however. I do not wield an editorial pen, do not belong to "the Administration kennel," hold no office the President, and desire none. On , I am no great admirer of " powers that be;" but, unlike the "military editor" aforesaid, I do find some things in the conduct of the President to approve of. Not so with the literary Jomini who prescribes campaigns and pronounces judgment upon military operations from his easy tripped at the foot of Capitol Hill. Nothing that the President or Cabinet can do pleases him. Whatever is good goes to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that
Appomattox (Virginia, United States) (search for this): article 4
[Communicated.]the Whig and "Appomattox" The "military editor" at the foot of Capital Square is mistaken — no unusual thing with him, however. I do not wield an editorial pen, do not belong to "the Administration kennel," hold no office the President, and desire none. On , I am no great admirer of " powers that be;" but, unlike the "military editor" aforesaid, I do find some things in the conduct of the President to approve of. Not so with the literary Jomini who prescribes campaigns anch it is aimed; it may, however, excite the contempt of intelligent men for those who employ it. I had hoped that the newspaper press, as well as the people of the South, would gain something valuable by the separation from the North. The course of the Whig, and some other papers not far from Richmond, does not afford much encouragement to this hope. For Heaven's sake, let the press be decent. Let it be governed by principle, not prejudice. Let it use argument, not abuse. Appomattox.
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 4
desire none. On , I am no great admirer of " powers that be;" but, unlike the "military editor" aforesaid, I do find some things in the conduct of the President to approve of. Not so with the literary Jomini who prescribes campaigns and pronounces judgment upon military operations from his easy tripped at the foot of Capitol Hill. Nothing that the President or Cabinet can do pleases him. Whatever is good goes to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he sugg
Hood (search for this): article 4
dgment upon military operations from his easy tripped at the foot of Capitol Hill. Nothing that the President or Cabinet can do pleases him. Whatever is good goes to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that there was a proper man not far distant from Petersburg to whom the command should have been committed, and charged the President with being governed by "a malignant jealously unparalleled outside of the bottomless pit." In these constant
Joe Johnston (search for this): article 4
but, unlike the "military editor" aforesaid, I do find some things in the conduct of the President to approve of. Not so with the literary Jomini who prescribes campaigns and pronounces judgment upon military operations from his easy tripped at the foot of Capitol Hill. Nothing that the President or Cabinet can do pleases him. Whatever is good goes to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that there was a proper man not far distant from Petersburg
Hardee (search for this): article 4
time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that there was a propeHardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that there was a proper man not far distant from Petersburg to whom the command should have been committed, and charged the President with being governed by "a malignant jealously unparalleled outside of the bottomless pit." In these constant changes of position the aforesaid editor violates one of the oldest maxims of the military art: He exposes his rear and flanks to assault. I am surprised that one who acts himself up as a teacher of the art, who aspires to instruct the President, and to point out to our Ge
Bragg (search for this): article 4
On , I am no great admirer of " powers that be;" but, unlike the "military editor" aforesaid, I do find some things in the conduct of the President to approve of. Not so with the literary Jomini who prescribes campaigns and pronounces judgment upon military operations from his easy tripped at the foot of Capitol Hill. Nothing that the President or Cabinet can do pleases him. Whatever is good goes to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that the
Jomini (search for this): article 4
s to the credit of somebody else; whatever is bad is charged to the account of "Jeff. Davis" or "Bragg." For some time previous to the removal of Johnston the editor attempted to ridicule his movements. When the President relieved him of command, determined not to be pleased, he found fault with the President for his appointment of Hood as his successor. "Hardee had been overslaughed." But it turns out that Hardee had already refused to take command of the army. This made it necessary for Jomini — I mean the "military editor"--to change his plan of assault. Whereupon he suggested that there was a proper man not far distant from Petersburg to whom the command should have been committed, and charged the President with being governed by "a malignant jealously unparalleled outside of the bottomless pit." In these constant changes of position the aforesaid editor violates one of the oldest maxims of the military art: He exposes his rear and flanks to assault. I am surprised that o