hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 38 0 Browse Search
Christmas 18 0 Browse Search
December 26th 16 16 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 14 0 Browse Search
Montreal (Canada) 12 0 Browse Search
W. W. Holden 8 0 Browse Search
Maximilian 8 0 Browse Search
E. M. Grant 8 0 Browse Search
Prentice 8 0 Browse Search
Reverdy Johnson 7 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: December 27, 1865., [Electronic resource].

Found 530 total hits in 291 results.

... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...
Hunt (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
R. T. Daniel (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
Sloat (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
Harmer Gilmer (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
J. H. Gilmer (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
United States (United States) (search for this): article 21
Interesting case. --The Court of Conciliation upon the last day of its session decided a principle of great importance. The case was that of Hunt against Sloat, in which the issue was, whether a check of the Confederate States Government given by a tenant to his landlord five days before the fall of Richmond, as payment for rent, and received as such, though it was never cashed by the Treasury — whether such a payment was valid. The law on both sides was fully discussed by J. H. Gilmer and Harmer Gilmer, Jr., for the defendant, and R. T. Daniel for the plaintiff. The Court decided that the payment was not good. The counsel for the defendant took an appeal to General Terry, who has stayed the execution of the judgment, and now has the important question under consideration.
December 25th (search for this): article 22
The Mayor's business on Christmas day. The Mayor opened his Court on Monday morning, mentioning at the time that it was not usual to hold a tribunal on this festive occasion, but the large number of arrests rendered in it necessary. The following cases were heard. Fanny Taylor was charged with being drunk and disorderly in the poor-house. An officer stated that, after her arrest and confinement, she was very "wild," and the accused stated that she got wild occasionally, from a wound in her head, when nobody could do anything with her. She was committed to jail in default of two hundred dollars security for her appearance. Henry Langhorne, charged with assaulting, his mother and creating a disturbance, had his case postponed until the next day. Peter Stagg was charged with stealing a watch, and being drunk and disorderly, and making an assault on policeman Sweeney. The case was postponed until the 26th. Billy Langford and C. M. Carnell were charged with att
Sweeney (search for this): article 22
and confinement, she was very "wild," and the accused stated that she got wild occasionally, from a wound in her head, when nobody could do anything with her. She was committed to jail in default of two hundred dollars security for her appearance. Henry Langhorne, charged with assaulting, his mother and creating a disturbance, had his case postponed until the next day. Peter Stagg was charged with stealing a watch, and being drunk and disorderly, and making an assault on policeman Sweeney. The case was postponed until the 26th. Billy Langford and C. M. Carnell were charged with attempting an assault with a brick and creating a disturbance at the United States Hotel. The house was represented as a place of had repute by Carnell, and he further stated that the disturbance arose from the firing of pop-crackers. Security for good behavior was required in the sum of three hundred dollars. The case of H. Q. Allen, charged with an assault upon two Federal soldiers, was
Peter Stagg (search for this): article 22
Taylor was charged with being drunk and disorderly in the poor-house. An officer stated that, after her arrest and confinement, she was very "wild," and the accused stated that she got wild occasionally, from a wound in her head, when nobody could do anything with her. She was committed to jail in default of two hundred dollars security for her appearance. Henry Langhorne, charged with assaulting, his mother and creating a disturbance, had his case postponed until the next day. Peter Stagg was charged with stealing a watch, and being drunk and disorderly, and making an assault on policeman Sweeney. The case was postponed until the 26th. Billy Langford and C. M. Carnell were charged with attempting an assault with a brick and creating a disturbance at the United States Hotel. The house was represented as a place of had repute by Carnell, and he further stated that the disturbance arose from the firing of pop-crackers. Security for good behavior was required in the su
Fanny Taylor (search for this): article 22
The Mayor's business on Christmas day. The Mayor opened his Court on Monday morning, mentioning at the time that it was not usual to hold a tribunal on this festive occasion, but the large number of arrests rendered in it necessary. The following cases were heard. Fanny Taylor was charged with being drunk and disorderly in the poor-house. An officer stated that, after her arrest and confinement, she was very "wild," and the accused stated that she got wild occasionally, from a wound in her head, when nobody could do anything with her. She was committed to jail in default of two hundred dollars security for her appearance. Henry Langhorne, charged with assaulting, his mother and creating a disturbance, had his case postponed until the next day. Peter Stagg was charged with stealing a watch, and being drunk and disorderly, and making an assault on policeman Sweeney. The case was postponed until the 26th. Billy Langford and C. M. Carnell were charged with atte
... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...