hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 16 0 Browse Search
U. S. Grant 13 1 Browse Search
Lincoln 13 1 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 12 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 12 0 Browse Search
Sherman 11 3 Browse Search
Maximilian 10 0 Browse Search
John Russell 8 4 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 6, 1865., [Electronic resource].

Found 398 total hits in 224 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
January (search for this): article 1
By J. A. Cowardin & co.terms of Subscription: Daily Paper.--For one year, one hundred Dollars; six months, Fifty Dollars; three months, Twenty-Five Dollars; one month, ten Dollars. Agents and News Dealers will be furnished at thirty Dollars per hundred copies. Alloriers must be accompanied with the money, to insure attention; and all remittances by mail will be at the risk of those who make them. Advertising.--Advertisements will be inserted at the rate of Three Dollars per square for each insertion. Eight lines (or less) constitute a square. Larger advertisements in exact proportion. Advertisements published till forbid will be charged Three Dollars per square for every insertion.
J. A. Cowardin (search for this): article 1
By J. A. Cowardin & co.terms of Subscription: Daily Paper.--For one year, one hundred Dollars; six months, Fifty Dollars; three months, Twenty-Five Dollars; one month, ten Dollars. Agents and News Dealers will be furnished at thirty Dollars per hundred copies. Alloriers must be accompanied with the money, to insure attention; and all remittances by mail will be at the risk of those who make them. Advertising.--Advertisements will be inserted at the rate of Three Dollars per square for each insertion. Eight lines (or less) constitute a square. Larger advertisements in exact proportion. Advertisements published till forbid will be charged Three Dollars per square for every insertion.
Thackeray (search for this): article 1
Lord John Russell winds up his latest speech on American affairs with the expression of his great satisfaction that the war will put an end to the horrible barbarity and sin of slavery. Now, here is "a angel," a regular angel, with the wings, as Mr. Thackeray would say, sprouting visibly from his shoulders an immaculate, semi-hating angel, too good for this world, and deserving to be prime minister in some better and brighter sphere than this fallen planet. This unhappy war, most sad for Earl Russell to think of, and truly afflicting to all lovers of humanity; but then, drying his eyes, there is this consolation, quoth the angel, that the reign of sin and Satan, in the shape of human slavery, will thereby come to an end. Is it not possible, we ask with profound reverence, we should abhor ourselves for indulging such a suspicion, were it not sanctioned by high authority, that Satan sometimes appears in the form of an angel of light? Is he ever so execrable, is he eve
John Russell (search for this): article 1
Lord John Russell winds up his latest speech on American affairs with the expression of his great satisfaction that the war will put an end to the horrible baps were directed against hypocrisy. What a dreadful suspicion it is that Lord John Russell may be the greatest hypocrite on the face of the earth ! If slavery ishmen were the criminals. But here they are, brought by those Englishmen, as Russell himself admits; here Englishmen planted the tree, and watered and nourished ited and treated them well, as their rapid multiplication proves. If the act of Russell's slave-trading ancestors was a crime, why must we, the innocent inheritors o if it is our duty to give up the slaves, give us back the consideration, Lord John Russell, which our ancestors paid to your ancestors for them, and which your counany kind which is the product of the slave trade or of slave labor. Does Lord John Russell hold that the original African thief, and the principal receiver of the p
Dominican Republic (Dominican Republic) (search for this): article 1
nt, holy persons in England will be consoled for the afflictions that America has suffered in this war by her future inability, in consequence of the abolition of slavery, to raise any more cotton and have any more commerce? We know, well enough, that if Africans are going voluntarily to cultivate the soil in the Southern States, to become industrious, systematic, productive laborers, it will be the first example of the kind in the whole history of the world. He knows from Jamaica, from St. Domingo, from every spot of earth where the experiment has been tried, that free negro labor, instead of converting a wilderness into a garden, converts a garden into a wilderness. He knows that the only result of such experiments is the ruin not only of the soil, but of the African race, who, left to themselves, uniformly relapse into depravity and barbarism.--Yet, with this knowledge of this fact, attested by all history, he expects us to believe that it is the probable extinction of the "crim
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
evolent soul with such seraphic satisfaction, why has he advised his countrymen that they may sell muskets, shells, gunpowder and cannon to the party that perpetrates, equally with the party that opposes, that most horrible crime? that they may sell ships like the Alabama to those outrageous criminals, to worry and devour and drive from the ocean the nation which is laboring to overthrow the great sin against humanity? Is it possible that the sin and iniquity and total depravity of the United States having ships and commerce is an even more hideous and appalling crime in the British code of morality than human slavery? The ingenuous angel admits that "it was the crime of Englishmen to introduce slavery to America"--a fact which is too evident for even Exeter Hall to deny. Yes, it was their act, against which America in vain remonstrated; and, being so, why do they make us responsible for their crime? We did not bring the negroes here. They might have lived in Africa to this
Jamaica, L. I. (New York, United States) (search for this): article 1
l pious, excellent, holy persons in England will be consoled for the afflictions that America has suffered in this war by her future inability, in consequence of the abolition of slavery, to raise any more cotton and have any more commerce? We know, well enough, that if Africans are going voluntarily to cultivate the soil in the Southern States, to become industrious, systematic, productive laborers, it will be the first example of the kind in the whole history of the world. He knows from Jamaica, from St. Domingo, from every spot of earth where the experiment has been tried, that free negro labor, instead of converting a wilderness into a garden, converts a garden into a wilderness. He knows that the only result of such experiments is the ruin not only of the soil, but of the African race, who, left to themselves, uniformly relapse into depravity and barbarism.--Yet, with this knowledge of this fact, attested by all history, he expects us to believe that it is the probable extinct
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 2
es of the country; defended by a splendid French army, and with all France at his back. Yet the Philadelphia Inquirer can see hope for Mexico in such a condition of things, and none for the Confederacy, whose capital stands erect and defiant; whose armies, under some of the first generals of the age, hold the field with invincible courage and determination, and whose people pray God, with one heart, as the greatest of earthly blessings, to be delivered from Federal subjugation. If President Davis were like Juarez, a fugitive from the capital, running from post to pillar, followed by some ten thousand Confederates, what would the Inquirer think and say of the prospects of the Confederate cause? Yet, we do not deny that Mexico may, after all, reclaim her independence. The condition of Juarez is, after all, not much worse than of Washington at one period of the Revolution. If the majority of his people are determined to be free, the French occupation can never be permanent. All
January 1st (search for this): article 2
Juarez, the Mexican President, has issued a New Year's Proclamation, which the Philadelphia Inquirer says-- "Does not read like the despairing fare-well of a chieftain who abandons a desperate cause. He conjures his countrymen to adhere to the fortunes of their country, not with the despondent words of one who doubts the issue of his appeals, but with a steady confidence which inspires and encourages.--The spirit of this sturdy Republican is not daunted by ill- fortune. There is no token of giving up the contest in his words. He speaks to the minds and the hearts of his countrymen, and bids them to be of good cheer. He counsels new efforts, and is resolved to maintain his struggles for Constitutional Government. The position of Maximilian continues most unhappy. He is in the condition of the man who bought a lawsuit. "Instead of being welcomed as the great pacificator of Mexico, he is an object of unrelenting hate to a large majority of the people whose good wi
Juarez (search for this): article 2
Juarez, the Mexican President, has issued a New Year's Proclamation, which the Philadelphia Inquirer says-- "Does not read like the despairing fare-well of a chieftain who abandons a desperate cause. He conjures his countrymen to adhere heart, as the greatest of earthly blessings, to be delivered from Federal subjugation. If President Davis were like Juarez, a fugitive from the capital, running from post to pillar, followed by some ten thousand Confederates, what would the Inqts of the Confederate cause? Yet, we do not deny that Mexico may, after all, reclaim her independence. The condition of Juarez is, after all, not much worse than of Washington at one period of the Revolution. If the majority of his people are detever be permanent. All depends upon the people themselves. Why then are we, whose condition is so different from that of Juarez, invoked to despair, while Mexico is encouraged to hope? Are we less patriotic, less warlike, less liberty-loving, than
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...