This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
[7]
men were included, these being Irving with eighty-four votes and Hawthorne with seventy-three.
It is a well-known fact that when the temporary leader in any particular branch of literature or science passes away, there is often visible a slight reaction, perhaps in the interest of supposed justice, when people try to convince themselves that his fame has already diminished.
Such reactions have notably occurred, for instance, in the cases of Scott, Byron, Wordsworth, and even of Burns, yet without visible or permanent results, while the weaker fame of Southey or of Campbell has yielded to them.
It is safe to say that up to the present moment no serious visible reaction has occurred in the case of Longfellow.
So absolutely simple and truthful was his nature and so clear the response of the mass of readers, that time has so far left his hold upon them singularly unaffected.
During a recent visit to England, the author of this volume took some pains, in every place he visited in city or country, to inquire of the local bookseller as to the demand for Longfellow's poems, and the answer was always in substance and sometimes in express words, ‘He is a classic,’ —in other words, his books had a steady and trustworthy sale.
I always found his poems on the shelves, and this was true of no other American
Boston and New York, Hougton, Mifflin and company, 1902.
Tufts University provided support for entering this text.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.