[698] frōfor ond fultum, acc. sing.; 1273: frōfre ond fultum. Occasionally, in later texts, frōfor is treated as a masc. (also neut.?); cf. Sievers, Beitr. i 493. Has, in this case, a spelling frōfr (= frōfr', see 668) been erroneously changed to frōfor?
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
Beowulf. Fr. Klaeber. Boston. D.C. Heath and Company. 1922.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.