hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
D. Russell 38 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 36 0 Browse Search
James McIntosh 11 1 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Benjamin McCulloch 9 1 Browse Search
Virginia (Virginia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
Mason 8 0 Browse Search
January 14th 7 7 Browse Search
John Henry Ashby 6 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: January 15, 1862., [Electronic resource].

Found 784 total hits in 430 results.

... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...
York city has elected a new Mayor. Therefore, says the oracular Russell of course we shall have a Northern civil war. Common sense people do not see the deduction, and thing the argument rather obscure. But then, is not obscurity a prophetic quality? Why, for thousands of years the world has been puzzling itself over some of the Biblical predictions, and can yet make nothing out of them. Regarding Russell, as we do, as not only he equal, but the superior, of such fellows as Jeremiah and Hosea, we defy any one to find any meaning in his utterances in any less time than twice as many thousand years. To be oracular one must be obscure. What is the use of being a prophet if every one can understand your reasons for your predictions? Nor is the objection less trivial that the reasons contradict the prophecy; for if the papers have no greater matter than their circulation to discuss, and if the people can become so excited about such an unimportant affair as a mayoralty election,
D. Russell (search for this): article 7
ts, and whose hospitality he abuses, Mr. Ll. D. Russell continues to write silly letters upon Americthe official reports give the lie direct to Mr. Russell's statements; but, then, what is the veraciared to that of a Times correspondent? Mr. Russell was nowhere near the battle field, and yet ro; but then Meagher is only an Irishman, and Russell is that luaus natural, an Irish tory. After n contradicts these assertions, and says that Russell did nothing but spur up his horse and beat a hasty retreat; but is Russell's word to be doubted upon such evidence? Certainly not. Russell is amade such a fiasco and it were found out. But Russell is no ordinary soothsayer. Such failures do can yet make nothing out of them. Regarding Russell, as we do, as not only he equal, but the supeefore, to be without any religion?--Ah, no; Mr. Russell seems to write trash; but he knows more abolt in the ejection or suspension of Russell. Russell dose lie, vilify, slander, abuse, misrepresen[9 more...]
January, 1 AD (search for this): article 7
The prophet Russell upon American institutions.[from the New York Herald Jan. 1.] Still remaining in a country whose integrity he opposes, whose institutions he slanders, whose policy he misrepresents, and whose hospitality he abuses, Mr. Ll. D. Russell continues to write silly letters upon American affairs to the London Times, Having lost here what little reputation he had as a correspondent, he now seems anxious to convince those who read his letters that he is a prophet. The number of such phrases as "I told you so before," and "as I formerly predicted," and "as I said it would be," and "as I told you months ago," contained in his letters, would baffle the Lightning Calculator to compute. That Mr. Eussel brought extraordinary powers to his prophetic work no one can doubt. He had been in this country but a very short time before we discovered that he reported occurrences upon the clairvoyant principle, and that it was not at all necessary for him to be present in order
tality he abuses, Mr. Ll. D. Russell continues to write silly letters upon American affairs to the London Times, Having lost here what little reputation he had as a correspondent, he now seems anxious to convince those who read his letters that he is a prophet. The number of such phrases as "I told you so before," and "as I formerly predicted," and "as I said it would be," and "as I told you months ago," contained in his letters, would baffle the Lightning Calculator to compute. That Mr. Eussel brought extraordinary powers to his prophetic work no one can doubt. He had been in this country but a very short time before we discovered that he reported occurrences upon the clairvoyant principle, and that it was not at all necessary for him to be present in order to accurately describe any incident or occurrence. His description of the battle of Bull Run, for instance, and of the panic that ensued, was a mannerly piece of workmanship. It was impossible for ordinary people to unders
Sumner's Pence speech. Mr. Sumner made a decidedly strong peace speech on the Treat affair in the Senate on Thursday last. He throws the entire blame on Captain Wilkes, who he excuses on the score of patriotism. We extract a few of the reading points of the speech: It should not be forgotten that this question was simMr. Sumner made a decidedly strong peace speech on the Treat affair in the Senate on Thursday last. He throws the entire blame on Captain Wilkes, who he excuses on the score of patriotism. We extract a few of the reading points of the speech: It should not be forgotten that this question was simply one of law — just as was that of a matter of trespass between individuals; the object being to determine which was eight and which was wrong. But it cannot be forgotten that, in times past, on this identical point of law, Great Britain persistently held an opposite ground from that which she now takes. There are yet othetly in the military and naval service of the enemy. 3. Are dispatches contraband of war, so as to render the ship liable to seizure? * * * * * * * * Mr. Sumner then took up the point which has been made, that the steam-picket having on board the emissaries, was on this account liable to capture, and rebutted it. He sai
Sumner's Pence speech. Mr. Sumner made a decidedly strong peace speech on the Treat affair in the Senate on Thursday last. He throws the entire blame on Captain Wilkes, who he excuses on the score of patriotism. We extract a few of the reading points of the speech: It should not be forgotten that this question was simply one of law — just as was that of a matter of trespass between individuals; the object being to determine which was eight and which was wrong. But it cannot be forg Of course this whole discussion proceeds on the assumption that the rebels are to be regarded as belligerents, which is the character already accorded to them by Great Britain. It they are not regarded as belligerents, then the proceeding of Capt. Wilkes is undoubtedly illegal and void. To a political offender, the asylum of a foreign jurisdiction is sacred whether on shore or on sea, and the United States has always maintained the right of asylum as firmly as it has rejected the pretension o
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 8
question was simply one of law — just as was that of a matter of trespass between individuals; the object being to determine which was eight and which was wrong. But it cannot be forgotten that, in times past, on this identical point of law, Great Britain persistently held an opposite ground from that which she now takes. There are yet other points, however, on which had the ship been carried into port for adjudication, controversy must have arisen. The three following points have been p, especially of the French Government, in the recent letter of M. Thousand. Of course this whole discussion proceeds on the assumption that the rebels are to be regarded as belligerents, which is the character already accorded to them by Great Britain. It they are not regarded as belligerents, then the proceeding of Capt. Wilkes is undoubtedly illegal and void. To a political offender, the asylum of a foreign jurisdiction is sacred whether on shore or on sea, and the United States has al
United States (United States) (search for this): article 8
n from the ship, but also because the ship, however guilty, morality, was not guilty, legally in receiving such passengers on board. * * * * * * * * Other authorities were cited also as clearly proving that according to American principles and practice the ship was not liable to capture on account of dispatches on board. And here against we have the concurring testimony of continental Europe, especially of the French Government, in the recent letter of M. Thousand. Of course this whole discussion proceeds on the assumption that the rebels are to be regarded as belligerents, which is the character already accorded to them by Great Britain. It they are not regarded as belligerents, then the proceeding of Capt. Wilkes is undoubtedly illegal and void. To a political offender, the asylum of a foreign jurisdiction is sacred whether on shore or on sea, and the United States has always maintained the right of asylum as firmly as it has rejected the pretension of impressment.
William T. Smithson (search for this): article 9
Important arrest. --Wm. T. Smithson, the banker and broker, arrested here yesterday afternoon by order of the Government, on suspicion of communicating with the reliefs, left in the same afternoon train for Fort Lafayette. This is considered one of the most important arrests that has taken place since the commencement of the rebellion.
A little son of Captain R. L. Lacy fell into a tub of hot water, in Jackson, Tennessee, the other day, and was scalded to death. The editor of the Charleston Courier, on the 9th inst., had a present of a saucer of delicious strawberries, fresh from the vines. General Robert Toombs was in Columbus, Georgia, on the 7th instant.
... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...