hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity (current method)
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 44 0 Browse Search
Lincoln 22 0 Browse Search
Joseph H. Birdsall 20 0 Browse Search
George W. Anderson 14 0 Browse Search
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
A. Rowan 11 1 Browse Search
Shepherd 10 0 Browse Search
Price 10 0 Browse Search
E. Kirby Smith 9 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: October 2, 1861., [Electronic resource].

Found 982 total hits in 527 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
la Courier, caused freshets in several of the rivers, and caused serious damage on the plantations. The lower planters on the Lavaca river suffered heavy loss. Hon. F. S. Stockdale lost three thousand bushels of corn and about seventy-five bales of cotton. So great a freshet has not occurred on the Lavaca river during the past fifteen years. The loss to planters is immense. The salt being procured from the works in the vicinity of Corpus Christi, is said to be equal to the finest Turk's Island. A large force is employed in gathering it, and thousands of bushels are daily procured — enough to keep the whole Confederacy from spoiling. As far as heard from Lubbock is 4375 votes ahead of Clark for Governor, and Clark is 1234 ahead of Chambers. The superintendent of the State penitentiary says that institution can turn out 1000 yards per day of goods suited for winter clothing for the troops. The 1st regiment of Galveston volunteers contains five German companies.
nderstand that by controlling all the evaporating force of the sun and winds, you could have, as we have in the South of France, three times more salt than is now made in your wooden vats, or the same quantity three times cheaper. Indeed, for the last twenty years the French sea salt, per 100 kilogrammes of 232 pounds (4 bushels,) costs eight or nine cents, or about two cents per bushel. This fact is of public notoriety. By some new improvements in salt works which I introduced in Italy in 1848, I have produced the bushel for only one and a half cent. from the brine of the Adriatic sea, which is six times weaker than yours, for it has only two and a half per cent. of salt, while yours has sixteen or eighteen per cent. Thus, in Syracuse in spite of the richness of the brine, the cost to the manufacturer per bushel is seven cents, when in France and Italy it is only two cents. Why so incredible a difference? Read once more the report of Prof. Cook: they lose three-fourths of their s
l article. According to reports of the Treasury, this importation of salt was about 13,000,000 of bushels during the year 1854-55, and during 1855-56 it has been 15,405, 864 bushels. In the following years, 17,000,000 of bushels have been imported,e yearly manufactured; 5,000,000 by boilers, and about 1,000,000 by solar evaporation. When I went, near the close of 1854, to visit this splendid laboratory of human skill, I asked the producing price of the article. "It varies in some places ow, as it would take too long to give you my secret, I prefer to reason with your official reports. In the last report of 1854, (page 14,) Prof. Cook, appointed by Syracuse itself, tells you that about three-fourths of the evaporating power is lost ected advice for American consumers, and especially for the Southern men who are consuming only foreign salt! In the year 1854-55, Cadiz shipped to the United States 580,400 bushels of sea salt; and, in 1855-56, Spain, from the Atlantic to the Medit
rts of the Treasury, this importation of salt was about 13,000,000 of bushels during the year 1854-55, and during 1855-56 it has been 15,405, 864 bushels. In the following years, 17,000,000 of bushel1855-56 it has been 15,405, 864 bushels. In the following years, 17,000,000 of bushels have been imported, though the domestic production from the salt springs had increased progressively up to 12.000,000, either in Virginia, Pennsylvania, or the State of New York. This domestic ually, not by me, but by American witnesses of the highest authority. In the Consular Returns of 1855-6. printed by order of Congress, (vol. 3, p. 107,) I found the following testimony of the exportsumers, and especially for the Southern men who are consuming only foreign salt! In the year 1854-55, Cadiz shipped to the United States 580,400 bushels of sea salt; and, in 1855-56, Spain, from the 1855-56, Spain, from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean, forwarded to the same American market, 880, 723 bushels; thus sharing, in a small portion, the profits of British salt traders, but understanding quite enough the great
argo of this vital article. According to reports of the Treasury, this importation of salt was about 13,000,000 of bushels during the year 1854-55, and during 1855-56 it has been 15,405, 864 bushels. In the following years, 17,000,000 of bushels have been imported, though the domestic production from the salt springs had increas example of the cheapness of Southern European salt is given equally, not by me, but by American witnesses of the highest authority. In the Consular Returns of 1855-6. printed by order of Congress, (vol. 3, p. 107,) I found the following testimony of the exporting price of Cadiz salt: "The average wholesale price," says the Ameriecially for the Southern men who are consuming only foreign salt! In the year 1854-55, Cadiz shipped to the United States 580,400 bushels of sea salt; and, in 1855-56, Spain, from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean, forwarded to the same American market, 880, 723 bushels; thus sharing, in a small portion, the profits of British sa
December, 1859 AD (search for this): article 4
The Orange groves of Florida. --After a while, when our Northern "blue law," sanctimonious friends of the fanatical portion of Satan's subjects, become thoroughly convinced that it is unpleasant, as well as unprofitable, to wage a war dictated by iniquity against the Southern people of America, who alone have the true landmarks of Christianity and free government, we will publish a very excellent article by Rev. R. Abbey, suggested by a visit to the orange groves in December, 1859. Our friends farther North need not fuel much surprise to learn that we have fine oranges in this section every month of the year, and if any of our contemporaries should feel the want of acidity of language at any time, a visit to our beautiful groves, with a little tasting, will supply the deficiency, though just at this time artificial means are not in demand, for Ancient Rascality, (Bennett,) and the whole of the "blue nose" clan, cause us all to prove conclusively that scribblers have a temper of
January 2nd, 1860 AD (search for this): article 3
Virginia: --At Rules held in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for King William County on Monday, August 5th, 1861: William Taylor...In Debt. against Jos. H. Birdsall and Geo. W. Anderson, In Debt. The object of this action is to recover from the defendants, Joseph H. Birdsall and Geo. W. Anderson, the sum of $110.00, with interest thereon from the 1st day of January, 1861, due and payable unto the plaintiff, Wm. Taylor, on a bond of the said defendants, executed to said plaintiff on the 2d of January, 1860, for the sum of $110.00, and payable on or before the first day of January, 1861. And affidavit having been made and filed that the defendants, Jos. H. Birdsall and Geo. W. Anderson, are non-residents of this Commonwealth, the said defendants are required to appear here within one month after due publication of this order and do what is necessary to protect their interest in this suit. Teste: se 3--1aw4w* Wm. D. Pollard, D. C.
May 26th, 1860 AD (search for this): article 2
Court for King William County, on the Monday the 5th of August, 1861: Roger Gregory, As'ee of E. C. Cranmer, In Debt. against Joseph H. Birdsall,...In Debt. The object of this action is to recover from the defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, the amount due unto the plaintiff, as the assignee of E. C. Cranmer, from the said defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, by reason of certain promissory notes given unto the said Cranmer by the said Birdsall--one for the sum of $30, bearing date May 26th, 1860; another for the sum of $10, bearing date October 31st, 1860; another for the sum of $30, bearing date July 6th, 1860; and another for the sum of $32, bearing date April 11th, 1861--and all which are payable on demand, and were assigned by the said Cranmer unto the said Gregory on the 17th of June, 1861: And affidavit having been made and filed that the defendant is a non-resident of this Commonwealth, the said defendant is required to appear within one month after due publication o
July 6th, 1860 AD (search for this): article 2
ebt. against Joseph H. Birdsall,...In Debt. The object of this action is to recover from the defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, the amount due unto the plaintiff, as the assignee of E. C. Cranmer, from the said defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, by reason of certain promissory notes given unto the said Cranmer by the said Birdsall--one for the sum of $30, bearing date May 26th, 1860; another for the sum of $10, bearing date October 31st, 1860; another for the sum of $30, bearing date July 6th, 1860; and another for the sum of $32, bearing date April 11th, 1861--and all which are payable on demand, and were assigned by the said Cranmer unto the said Gregory on the 17th of June, 1861: And affidavit having been made and filed that the defendant is a non-resident of this Commonwealth, the said defendant is required to appear within one month after due publication of this order and do what is necessary to protect his interest in this suit. Teste: se 2--1aw4w* Wm. D. Pollard,
October 31st, 1860 AD (search for this): article 2
ust, 1861: Roger Gregory, As'ee of E. C. Cranmer, In Debt. against Joseph H. Birdsall,...In Debt. The object of this action is to recover from the defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, the amount due unto the plaintiff, as the assignee of E. C. Cranmer, from the said defendant, Jos. H. Birdsall, by reason of certain promissory notes given unto the said Cranmer by the said Birdsall--one for the sum of $30, bearing date May 26th, 1860; another for the sum of $10, bearing date October 31st, 1860; another for the sum of $30, bearing date July 6th, 1860; and another for the sum of $32, bearing date April 11th, 1861--and all which are payable on demand, and were assigned by the said Cranmer unto the said Gregory on the 17th of June, 1861: And affidavit having been made and filed that the defendant is a non-resident of this Commonwealth, the said defendant is required to appear within one month after due publication of this order and do what is necessary to protect his intere
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...