previous next

§§ 26, 27. Thus we have been robbed of our property in our own city, as if forsooth these Phaselites had the right of reprisal on Athenians! For it is robbery not to pay debts. There was no dispute about facts, no ambiguity in the terms of the bond. It is simply roguery on their part. When both the contracting parties have made a written agreement, there is an end of it; it only remains for them to act up to the letter of the contract.

συλῶν] σύλας διδόναι is ‘to grant permission to make reprisals,’ corresponding to the modern practice of granting ‘letters of marque.’ Cf. § 13. Harpocr. (in v. σύλας) cites the sentence σεσυλήμεθαἀλλότρια, omitting τούτων before and ὄντων after Φασηλιτῶν, ὥσπερ before δεδομένων and βίᾳ after ἀναιροῦνται (sic). He refers the passage to the De Corona, by an evident mistake. Cf. Lysias 30 § 22ὁρῶνΒοιωτοὺς σύλας ποιουμένους.

οὐδ᾽ ἀκήκοα i.e. much less have I witnessed.

διαπεπραγμένοι Observe the medial use of the perfect passive corresponding to the aorist διεπράξαντο. Similarly εἰσπέπρακται in § 44.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
    • Lysias, Against Nicomachus, 22
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: