previous next
Why do they regard all the city wall as inviolable and sacred, but not the gates?

Is it, as Varro has written, because the wall must be considered sacred that men may fight and die with enthusiasm in its defence? It was under such circumstances, it seems, that Romulus killed his brother because he was attempting to leap across a place that was inviolable and sacred, and to make it traversable and profane.

But it was impossible to consecrate the gates, for through them they carry out many other objectionable things and also dead bodies.1 Wherefore the original founders of a city yoke a bull and a cow, and mark out with a plough all the land on which they intend to build2; and when they are engaged in tracing3 the circuit of the walls, as they measure off the space intended for gates, they lift up the ploughshare and thus carry the plough across, [p. 51] since they hold that all the land that is ploughed is to be kept sacred and inviolable.

1 Cf. Moralia, 518 b.

2 Cf. Varro, De Lingua Latina, v. 143, Res Rusticae, ii. 1. 9; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, i. 88; Ovid, Fasti, iv. 819 ff.

3 Cf. Life of Romulus, xi. (23 d).

load focus Greek (Frank Cole Babbitt, 1936)
load focus English (Goodwin, 1874)
load focus Greek (Gregorius N. Bernardakis, 1889)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: