hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Your search returned 541 results in 111 document sections:
The Daily Dispatch: September 5, 1861., [Electronic resource], Notes of the war. (search)
The Daily Dispatch: September 11, 1861., [Electronic resource], Notes of the war. (search)
The Daily Dispatch: September 23, 1861., [Electronic resource], Our correspondence. (search)
From Missouri. Mobile, Oct. 1.
--The St. Louis Democrat, of the 25th, says that Siegel did not attack Price at Lexington.
He was at St. Louis.
There were only 22,000 Confederates engaged at Lexington, against 30,000 Federals.
Ten thousand of the latter were out on a marauding expedition.
The Federals were so much exhausted that they were unable to resist the Confederates.
The following is Fremont's dispatch to Washington:
"Lexington has fallen into Price's hands.
Their winter supplies having been cut off, the reinforcements of fourteen thousand had no means of crossing the river in time to be of assistance.
I am taking the d, and hope to be able to destroy the enemy before or after their junction with McCulloch's forces."
A dispatch from Jefferson City says that Claib.
Jackson is advancing on Booneville with 10,000, and that Price is marching towards Georgetown with 20,000, the Lexington army being doubled for that purpose.
The steamer Clara Bell has
The Daily Dispatch: October 12, 1861., [Electronic resource], Treason saved him. (search)
Treason saved him.
--We learn from a private letter published in the Natchitoches Chronicle, that Gen. Siegel, when he found himself in danger at Oak Hill of being killed or captured, raised the Confederate flag and hurrahed for the South lustily.
By this means he deceived the Confederate troops, and was enabled to effect his escape.
The hoisting of the Confederate flag and hurrahing for the South were both treasonable acts; but as it was to save his life, it will no doubt be considered a praiseworthy feat.
Among those who are not governed by the code of morals and honor established by the "higher law," this act may be considered dishonorable, as well as treacherous and cowardly.